Jump to content

Thailand Servicing Russian Aircraft


Banana7

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MangoKorat said:

Yes Crossy but they also risk the punishment those sanctions entail if they choose not to.

Something TH will never have to worry about.  They'll always get a free pass from the USA, which means the rest of the west.  Teflon Thailand :cheesy:

 

Case in point, Military Coup & Martial Law = no USA foreign aid, so they renamed, initiated the ISA :cheesy:

No foreign aid interruption. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2024 at 9:35 AM, Lacessit said:

if Thailand was maintaining and repairing Russian Boeings and Airbuses, that is a different matter w.r.to sanctions.

Thailand does not, and does not have to, kowtow to the US's sanctions on a third country!

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are no sanctions on refuelling Russian owned planes, or boats, outside of Russia.  There are sanctions on exporting jet fuel, and its additives, to Russia, and on the use of US, and multiple other countries, made components to service them anywhere, but filling the tanks using local jet fuel on foreign soil is not covered.

 

Interestingly, at least one country in the region does actively aid Russia in evading sanctions, but it's not Thailand, so no use to the bashers.

 

"“Of course sanctions affect flight safety,” said Russian aviation analyst Andrei Menshenin in an interview. “They can’t not affect it.” But he said Russian airlines had softened the impact by importing spare parts and even fully reconditioned engines through Central Asia, Turkey, Singapore, Iran and other countries."

 

Russian air passengers face peril as planes show strain of sanctions - The Washington Post

 

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2024 at 2:26 AM, KhunLA said:

why would TH cower to silly sanctions imposed by USA.   As those sanction do nothing but benefit the USA. 

 Stupid statement. Sanctions by the US don't benefit the US -- their intent is to thwart the Soviet Union, er Russia, from taking over Ukraine. And the EU is onboard for most of these sanctions, as they have a lot more to lose if Russia becomes their new neighbor.

 

Thailand is playing its cards close to the vest, which is wise. There are probably some interesting discussions behind diplomatic closed doors. But the US, and EU, are smart enough to realize Thailand's dependency on tourism would be jeopardized if Russian airlift was restricted. Actually, the EU has a lot more reason to get everybody onboard with sanctions, so I'd be a lot more interested in hearing about any EU displeasure towards Thailand on this jet fuel episode....

 

Anyway, it's always fun to hear members of the Old World find fault with the US. Just pay us back for the Marshal Plan, and pay all the costs for NATO, as we certainly could use all those funds we provide for EU's defense to, instead, address our domestic problems. But, maybe come November, the EU won't have the US to bad mouth anymore -- and will be building school houses to teach Cyrillic.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, JimGant said:

 Stupid statement. Sanctions by the US don't benefit the US -- their intent is to thwart the Soviet Union, er Russia, from taking over Ukraine. And the EU is onboard for most of these sanctions, as they have a lot more to lose if Russia becomes their new neighbor.

 

Thailand is playing its cards close to the vest, which is wise. There are probably some interesting discussions behind diplomatic closed doors. But the US, and EU, are smart enough to realize Thailand's dependency on tourism would be jeopardized if Russian airlift was restricted. Actually, the EU has a lot more reason to get everybody onboard with sanctions, so I'd be a lot more interested in hearing about any EU displeasure towards Thailand on this jet fuel episode....

 

Anyway, it's always fun to hear members of the Old World find fault with the US. Just pay us back for the Marshal Plan, and pay all the costs for NATO, as we certainly could use all those funds we provide for EU's defense to, instead, address our domestic problems. But, maybe come November, the EU won't have the US to bad mouth anymore -- and will be building school houses to teach Cyrillic.

Really, then those must be some imaginary windfall profits of the US oil producers.  Surely nothing to do with Russian sanctions on oil sales.

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Banana7 said:

Because they follow the international rules and laws and are justified in their actions, unlike the cruel barbarians of Russia.

International rules are sanctioned by the UN, most actions by the US are not.

How many (cruel) dictators did they support in South America in the last 100 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Banana7 said:

Because they follow the international rules and laws and are justified in their actions, unlike the cruel barbarians of Russia.

Does the US follow international rules and laws and are justified when the US sanctioned members of the ICC court for investigation US war crimes in Afghanistan?

 

from DW

https://www.dw.com/en/afghanistan-why-has-the-icc-excluded-the-us-from-war-crimes-probe/a-59367096

Edited by freeworld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...