Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has directed the Provincial Police Region 8 Commander in Phuket Province to intensify efforts in apprehending individuals with bad influence who continuously violate the law.

 

During a meeting to review the police operations at the Provincial Police Region 8 Headquarters, the Prime Minister delivered policy directives, stating that over the past six months, there have been numerous arrests related to drug offenses.

 

Appreciation was expressed for the rigorous enforcement efforts. Various measures should be employed to apprehend offenders to address the issues more effectively, including continuous management and addressing the issue of online gambling, which has caused distress to the public.

 

Acknowledging the importance of morale-boosting incentives for the police force, especially regarding housing, it is imperative to ensure adequate and continuous construction of police residences. The government will take care of improving the living conditions of police personnel.

 

Regarding the development of Phuket province, strict measures should be enforced concerning illegal hotel businesses, ensuring that licenses are issued strictly and that no one operates above the law. This includes stringent oversight of tourism activities and preventing exploitation of tourists for personal gain.

 

Source: NNT 2024-04-20

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe
 

32 minutes ago, webfact said:

intensify efforts in apprehending individuals with bad influence who continuously violate the law

 

What's the use, if then they just spend a few months in hospital and get released...

So, influential figures would like to crack down on influential figures?

Its comedy hour week month decade century

I wrote the following before I realize the article above is only about Phuket.

But the principle is the same.

 

If they really would want to do that, then the list of influential people would include all MPs and many rich families. Because they are all influential people.

 

The more important question is which influential people use their influence to do good things, and which influential people use their influence to get more influence, more money, get out of jail, and all those things.

 

Please let us know if the Shinawatras are on the list of influential people. They should be on that list. They clearly use their influence all the time.

1 hour ago, zhounan said:

So, influential figures would like to crack down on influential figures?

 

You missed one part:

 

Influential figures telling influential figures to crack down on influential fixtures. 

1 hour ago, zhounan said:

So, influential figures would like to crack down on influential figures?

Only those influential figures from the others. Our own influential figures are obviously all good guys. 😉 

My unsolicited piece of advice would be to change the entire police force; it is one of the most cancerous agencies this country has - shortly after the armed forces 😉

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I wrote the following before I realize the article above is only about Phuket.

But the principle is the same.

 

If they really would want to do that, then the list of influential people would include all MPs and many rich families. Because they are all influential people.

 

The more important question is which influential people use their influence to do good things, and which influential people use their influence to get more influence, more money, get out of jail, and all those things.

 

Please let us know if the Shinawatras are on the list of influential people. They should be on that list. They clearly use their influence all the time.

I think you misread the article, as I did at first.

 

he was not talking about apprehending “influential people” in the sense of hiso thai people. He is talking about, well, criminals in the conventional sense. Although he termed it as people of bad influence who habitually offend. He goes on to list a number of crimes but focuses on drug crime.

 

bad headline really. The article, as far as I can see, is simply talking about crime in general

Edited April 20, 20242 yr by wensiensheng

He needs to have the balls to name names or this is pointless

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Please let us know if the Shinawatras are on the list of influential people. They should be on that list. They clearly use their influence all the time

For good or bad?😳

23 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

My unsolicited piece of advice would be to change the entire police force; it is one of the most cancerous agencies this country has - shortly after the armed forces 😉

But change with who or what?

 

I like this PM. First time a PM has ordered a crackdown on people that includes himself. R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

Influential people and people with bad influence is not one of the same

2 hours ago, zhounan said:

So, influential figures would like to crack down on influential figures?

get rid of the competition so to speak

 

Oh good now the RTP will all obey the law, that's it fixed then, now Saint Tony's Puppet has spoken. Oh when is Pootin coming for his R & R. 

2 hours ago, webfact said:

including continuous management and addressing the issue of online gambling, which has caused distress to the public.

The only members of the public that have had distress over gambling, are the fools that do it, meanwhile the loan sharks are very happy.

 When are the casinos going to open ?

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has directed the Provincial Police Region 8 Commander in Phuket Province to intensify efforts in apprehending individuals with bad influence who continuously violate the law.

Is that right across the board or just foreigners?

4 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

Is that right across the board or just foreigners?

Just falangs.

58 minutes ago, wensiensheng said:

I think you misread the article, as I did at first.

 

he was not talking about apprehending “influential people” in the sense of hiso thai people. He is talking about, well, criminals in the conventional sense. Although he termed it as people of bad influence who habitually offend. He goes on to list a number of crimes but focuses on drug crime.

 

bad headline really. The article, as far as I can see, is simply talking about crime in general

Somehow it seems you think those are completely different groups of people... 

At last an article whose title has nothing whatsoever to do with the content! 

 

Usually there would be some connection between the title and the content so you would strain to ascertain what that connection was. No such worry here. 

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Only those influential figures from the others. Our own influential figures are obviously all good guys. 😉 

Keep in mind that they held an accounting a few months back to identify people of questionable influence and question them. If memory serves me correctly of the 690+ people of bad influence almost 500 stated that they had already changed their ways, whatever that means. The remainder never committed to change nor did anything ever come of it.

7 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Keep in mind that they held an accounting a few months back to identify people of questionable influence and question them. If memory serves me correctly of the 690+ people of bad influence almost 500 stated that they had already changed their ways, whatever that means. The remainder never committed to change nor did anything ever come of it.

 

I would love to see their definition of "questionable influence". 

We could start with legal and illegal activities. And only because they are not arrested doesn't mean they didn't do anything illegal.

And somehow, I would be surprised if anybody who helped Thaksin is on the list of influential people, even if they are obviously influential. 

Great Idea but good luck with that.

35 minutes ago, brianthainess said:

are the fools that do it

 

And the fools who married the gambler or were born to them. Then there are the friends and family members who bailed out the gambler and were never repaid, the people who had things stolen and pawned for gambling money, or the employer who had funds embezzled to cover gambling debts.  

 

As flawless and magnificent as you so obviously are, we don't exist in a vacuum.  The odds of everyone around you also being perfect are very slim. Their flaws cause ripples across the pond.

6 minutes ago, Bobthegimp said:

As flawless and magnificent as you so obviously are, we don't exist in a vacuum.  The odds of everyone around you also being perfect are very slim. Their flaws cause ripples across the pond.

Well thanks I know I am, I don't surround myself in gamblers, had a GF who bailed her mother out using my money and I dumped her the same day.

No point in bailing out gamblers, they are addicts and will just continue. 

So where starts Mr. Srettha......with Thaksin

Should he also instruct the Police to crack down on influential figures throughout the nation... 

 

Perhaps start with property tycoons who use their influence and power in planning to free up over 900 acres (3.6km2) of prime river front real estate.....  

 

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1324482-bangkok-port-relocation-set-to-combat-pollution-and-congestion/

 

To be fair I think the media have some responsibility for these stupid headlines.....but Baloo should have wised up by now and know when to keep his mouth shut.

Where do you start? The land offices would be a good one,