Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, rocketboy2 said:

I'm ok on that. :thumbsup:

But I'm,  full on for the abolition,  of the religion of, peace and under standing, first.  :thumbsup:.

How about the ones followed by over a billion in India, the many millions that follow a different one in Asia, and the one followed by a very few million in the Middle East.

You wouldn't be being selective in your opposition to religion would you? Tell me it isn't so.

  • Confused 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

How about the ones followed by over a billion in India, the many millions that follow a different one in Asia, and the one followed by a very few million in the Middle East.

You wouldn't be being selective in your opposition to religion would you? Tell me it isn't so.

 

Nah, they can all go.

The world would be a better place with out them all.

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, rocketboy2 said:

 

Nah, they can all go.

The world would be a better place with out them all.

 

People need something to believe in. What would you replace religion with? Man made climate change perhaps?

 

IMO if we got rid of all the present religions, it wouldn't be long before someone invented a new one.

Posted
1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

People need something to believe in. What would you replace religion with? Man made climate change perhaps?

 

IMO if we got rid of all the present religions, it wouldn't be long before someone invented a new one.

 Your most likely right as it's all about control.

 

 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, rocketboy2 said:

 Your most likely right as it's all about control.

 

 

 

Of course it is. Always has been, always will be.

 

How many ways can you count that governments, and the 1%, control the population now that religion is dying in the west? One starts with "c" and another starts with "m" and ends with "c".

However, the very best one is war, and it's profitable for the 1% as well.

Posted
59 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Ya reckon Trump can change the constitution? :coffee1:

What kind of institution is it which allows a criminal to become POTUS? It's a bogus

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 6/1/2024 at 3:28 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

NATO needs an enemy or they have no reason to exist. Of course they didn't let Russia join the club.

If you want to control your enemy and want to know about his plans, just embrace him. So, to have Russia as an EU member would have offered huge opportunities for the economy of both. And as a member of NATO we would have known about Putin's"war" plans or restitution of Greater Russia. Spilled beans now. NATO nowadays has not only one enemy. And this was avoidable. The Americans were not amused by a strong Europe and a very strong Germany. Therefore they denied the membership.

(2 years ago the Gas Pipeline was successfully damaged because Germany's economy was too strong as Germany being a competitor and rival for US)

🙏

  • Sad 2
Posted
On 6/1/2024 at 12:40 AM, stoner said:

 

nor would you in a communist controlled place either. 

I thought a communist controlled place comes under the term totalitarian as I mentioned in my post! 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Which neo-con sponsored think-tank wrote this pablum?

Here - let me summarize it:  The solution to Russian and Chinese totalitarianism, and "far-right populism" is - Fascist totalitarianism wrapped in a package labelled "Liberal Democracy," wrapped in an EU and US flag and endorsed by unelected EU technocrats like Ursula Von Der Leyden.  In a typical 1984-esque manner, unelected is the new "Democracy." 

 

There, fixed it!  :thumbsup:

 

 

Edited by connda
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Hummin said:

I thought a communist controlled place comes under the term totalitarian as I mentioned in my post! 

 

Negative.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

If you want to control your enemy and want to know about his plans, just embrace him. So, to have Russia as an EU member would have offered huge opportunities for the economy of both. And as a member of NATO we would have known about Putin's"war" plans or restitution of Greater Russia. Spilled beans now. NATO nowadays has not only one enemy. And this was avoidable. The Americans were not amused by a strong Europe and a very strong Germany. Therefore they denied the membership.

(2 years ago the Gas Pipeline was successfully damaged because Germany's economy was too strong as Germany being a competitor and rival for US)

🙏

LOL. Without an enemy there is no reason to develop missiles that cost millions EACH, ergo the 1% doesn't profit. There is no profit in peace that can equal a war.

If Russia wasn't a convenient stooge they'd have had to invent one.

IMO like they invented covid as the destroyer of us all if we didn't take their hocus pocus new tech "vaccine", the one that doesn't actually stop us getting covid. Funny how the smallpox one does actually work though, LOL.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
14 hours ago, connda said:

Which neo-con sponsored think-tank wrote this pablum?

Here - let me summarize it:  The solution to Russian and Chinese totalitarianism, and "far-right populism" is - Fascist totalitarianism wrapped in a package labelled "Liberal Democracy," wrapped in an EU and US flag and endorsed by unelected EU technocrats like Ursula Von Der Leyden.  In a typical 1984-esque manner, unelected is the new "Democracy." 

 

There, fixed it!  :thumbsup:

 

 

WOW, that really nailed it!

The greatest success of the Von Der Leydens of the western world has been to fool most of the people that "democracy" actually exists, when IMO it's blindingly obvious that it doesn't.

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
17 hours ago, John Drake said:

You Euros should deal with Russia, while we Americans deal with China. 

It would be appropriate for America to sort China, given it was Nixon, a US president, that unleashed the monster into the world.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
15 hours ago, connda said:

Which neo-con sponsored think-tank wrote this pablum?

Here - let me summarize it:  The solution to Russian and Chinese totalitarianism, and "far-right populism" is - Fascist totalitarianism wrapped in a package labelled "Liberal Democracy," wrapped in an EU and US flag and endorsed by unelected EU technocrats like Ursula Von Der Leyden.  In a typical 1984-esque manner, unelected is the new "Democracy." 

 

There, fixed it!  :thumbsup:

 

 

you cant fix stupid    as your post demonstrates

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

WOW, that really nailed it!

The greatest success of the Von Der Leydens of the western world has been to fool most of the people that "democracy" actually exists, when IMO it's blindingly obvious that it doesn't.

Trumps ASEAN News Propaganda Puppet , Trumpbitchlover  lol

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 6/3/2024 at 3:34 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

WOW, that really nailed it!

The greatest success of the Von Der Leydens of the western world has been to fool most of the people that "democracy" actually exists, when IMO it's blindingly obvious that it doesn't.

The usual B.S......

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 6/3/2024 at 3:30 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. Without an enemy there is no reason to develop missiles that cost millions EACH, ergo the 1% doesn't profit. There is no profit in peace that can equal a war.

If Russia wasn't a convenient stooge they'd have had to invent one.

IMO like they invented covid as the destroyer of us all if we didn't take their hocus pocus new tech "vaccine", the one that doesn't actually stop us getting covid. Funny how the smallpox one does actually work though, LOL.

More B.S.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...