7 hours ago, G_Money said:

So, you can’t answer.  Similar to “Do as I say but not as I do”.

 

7 hours ago, G_Money said:

Still can’t answer?  What will you do?

 

Pretty simple and straightforward.

Why should I waste my time replying to your off-topic questions? 😁

 

The thread is about: Supreme Court rules Trump is entitled to some immunity in Jan. 6 case

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

 

Biden canceled every Trump border policy and let ten million illegal aliens flood across the border. 

 

Then Biden tries to get a bill passed that would do nothing but process the illegal aliens into the country more quickly and help get the illegal aliens legalized and subsidized as fast as possible. 

 

It is amusing that you still believe a media that has been swearing for years that Biden is sharp as a tack, that his aides can't keep up with him and that the videos showing Biden's condition were phony and had been generated by the evil Republicans.

 

Now, after Biden's debate performance, those same media outlets are using those same videos that they said were phony to call for Biden to drop out of the election. 

 

It is worth noting that NOWHERE in the non-right media is anyone even the slightest bit concerned that Biden is not in a condition to be the leader of the free world, the only concern is with the election and the left maintaining its hold on power. 

 

If he is not fit to run for election, he is not fit to run the country and should step down and let the Vice President assume his office. 

 

 

 

A reality check on Biden versus trump border policies.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65574725

 

trump followers previously blocked Biden's new policy in an endeavour not to give Biden any wins. Current border crossing numbers with Biden's new policy finally enacted:

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/26/border-crossings-drop-biden-policy-00165055

 

CNN is continuously running talking heads critiquing Biden debate. Just my POV, Biden preferable to un uncontrolled trump plans to destroy US government agencies by appointing unqualified lackeys and culling international treaties to achieve isolationism. 

 

I firmly believe Supreme Court decision will be deeply regretted if trump gains power. No point is replying to you further - never Trump!

13 minutes ago, candide said:

 

Why should I waste my time replying to your off-topic questions? 😁

 

The thread is about: Supreme Court rules Trump is entitled to some immunity in Jan. 6 case

How can one be given immunity when they have done nothing wrong?

 

Will you be depressed when Trump wins in November?  Appears it’s starting already.

22 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

A reality check on Biden versus trump border policies.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65574725

 

trump followers previously blocked Biden's new policy in an endeavour not to give Biden any wins. Current border crossing numbers with Biden's new policy finally enacted:

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/26/border-crossings-drop-biden-policy-00165055

 

CNN is continuously running talking heads critiquing Biden debate. Just my POV, Biden preferable to un uncontrolled trump plans to destroy US government agencies by appointing unqualified lackeys and culling international treaties to achieve isolationism. 

 

I firmly believe Supreme Court decision will be deeply regretted if trump gains power. No point is replying to you further - never Trump!

 

If there is a letup at the border, it's because the cartels and Mexico want to give Biden an election year boost.

 

Look up HR.2, and see who's really holding back meaningful reform.  Then read the "bipartisan" joke, and report back on how many illegals they were going to allow in each year.

 

Will Judge Chutkan schedule fact-finding court sessions in order to determine what can be considered (or not) as part of Trump's presidential duties? And when?

12 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

If there is a letup at the border, it's because the cartels and Mexico want to give Biden an election year boost.

 

Look up HR.2, and see who's really holding back meaningful reform.  Then read the "bipartisan" joke, and report back on how many illegals they were going to allow in each year.

 

 Not going to spend time reading the Act and all the other tasks. Got a story to tell, just summarise outcome/s with credible links to back up.

2 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 Not going to spend time reading the Act and all the other tasks. Got a story to tell, just summarise outcome/s with credible links to back up.

 

Lack of curiosity is not a virtue.  Enjoy the nice warm, comfortable MSM bubble where they spoon feed you what they want you to believe.

2 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Lack of curiosity is not a virtue.  Enjoy the nice warm, comfortable MSM bubble where they spoon feed you what they want you to believe.

 

I recommend you grow up and cease the childish personal commentary - you sound like an echo chamber of trump conspiracy nonsense.

11 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Candide has no answers... he doesn't even know what the real questions are... he is a typical liberal

Hes a Frenchman, he knows nothing of the our system and grew up in under the French style fascism of socialism system. Hell, how many governments have they gone though since 1789? Off with their head and Alfred Dreyfuss is their system of justice. 

 

Yet he is going to explain to us the effect of the Supreme Courts decision.

 

Say what you want about Trump and the USA, but unlike across the pond, we don't line folks up at the scaffold for their political views. Thats why you see so many calls for lawfare against Trump from that lot.

1 hour ago, simple1 said:

 

I recommend you grow up and cease the childish personal commentary - you sound like an echo chamber of trump conspiracy nonsense.

And perhaps, since you have already confessed your ignorance, your reliance in the views of others, and your lack of interest in learning about the subject you seek to expound on, you should refrain from continuing to add nothing to the discussion except baseless ad hominems.

4 hours ago, candide said:

Will Judge Chutkan schedule fact-finding court sessions in order to determine what can be considered (or not) as part of Trump's presidential duties? And when?

Well if you were familiar with the US system of justice, you would know that, to quote the boilerplate, the case is back to Judge Chutkan for "further proceedings in accordance with th[e] opinion.'

 

If you are stroking wood in the hopes of a trial before the election, its not going to happen.

26 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Well if you were familiar with the US system of justice, you would know that, to quote the boilerplate, the case is back to Judge Chutkan for "further proceedings in accordance with th[e] opinion.'

 

If you are stroking wood in the hopes of a trial before the election, its not going to happen.

More useless blah blah.

 

Where did I write that I was expecting Trump's trial to start before the election?

30 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Hes a Frenchman, he knows nothing of the our system and grew up in under the French style fascism of socialism system. Hell, how many governments have they gone though since 1789? Off with their head and Alfred Dreyfuss is their system of justice. 

 

Yet he is going to explain to us the effect of the Supreme Courts decision.

 

Say what you want about Trump and the USA, but unlike across the pond, we don't line folks up at the scaffold for their political views. Thats why you see so many calls for lawfare against Trump from that lot.

Blah blah....

6 minutes ago, candide said:

More useless blah blah.

 

Where did I write that I was expecting Trump's trial to start before the election.

"If you are stroking wood in the hopes of a trial before the election, its not going to happen."

 

English.  If: "a supposition; uncertain possibility":

 

I love the way you argue about stuff you dont know in a language you dont understand either.

39 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

And perhaps, since you have already confessed your ignorance, your reliance in the views of others, and your lack of interest in learning about the subject you seek to expound on, you should refrain from continuing to add nothing to the discussion except baseless ad hominems.

 

Yeah, I quit playing dueling links.  Partly because it's a rigged game with 10x as many registered Dems in journalism as registered Repubs. 

 

 

But mostly because if pointing someone in a direction doesn't pique their curiosity, why should I bother?  I gave him plenty of information to go down the rabbit hole.

 

Plus, the usual lefty response is that "you can't trust that source" because yet another leftist website posing as an unbiased fact checker says the source leans right and is unreliable.  What they really mean is that the source isn't as far left as they are, and it often disagrees with them.  Because the "fact checkers" hire from the same pool of lefty journalists.

 

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

"If you are stroking wood in the hopes of a trial before the election, its not going to happen."

 

English.  If: "a supposition; uncertain possibility":

 

I love the way you argue about stuff you dont know in a language you dont understand either.

More trolling blah blah about what I may hope and what I may not know.

1 minute ago, candide said:

More trolling blah blah about what I may hope and what I may not know.

Well its clear you dont know the meaning of the word "if"

5 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

A reality check on Biden versus trump border policies.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65574725

 

trump followers previously blocked Biden's new policy in an endeavour not to give Biden any wins. Current border crossing numbers with Biden's new policy finally enacted:

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/26/border-crossings-drop-biden-policy-00165055

 

CNN is continuously running talking heads critiquing Biden debate. Just my POV, Biden preferable to un uncontrolled trump plans to destroy US government agencies by appointing unqualified lackeys and culling international treaties to achieve isolationism. 

 

I firmly believe Supreme Court decision will be deeply regretted if trump gains power. No point is replying to you further - never Trump!

Biden canceled every Trump border policy and let ten million illegal aliens flood across the border. 

 

Then Biden tries to get a bill passed that would do nothing but process the illegal aliens into the country more quickly and help get the illegal aliens legalized and subsidized as fast as possible. 

 

It is amusing that you still believe a media that has been swearing for years that Biden is sharp as a tack, that his aides can't keep up with him and that the videos showing Biden's condition were phony and had been generated by the evil Republicans.

 

Now, after Biden's debate performance, those same media outlets are using those same videos that they said were phony to call for Biden to drop out of the election. 

 

It is worth noting that NOWHERE in the non-right media is anyone even the slightest bit concerned that Biden is not in a condition to be the leader of the free world, the only concern is with the election and the left maintaining its hold on power. 

 

If he is not fit to run for election, he is not fit to run the country and should step down and let the Vice President assume his office. 

 

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Well its clear you dont know the meaning of the word "if"

Well, it is clear that you comment was completely irrelevant.

6 hours ago, candide said:

More trolling blah blah about what I may hope and what I may not know.

You seem to be digging yourself into a deeper hole with each post.

 

Why not do what the French do best.  Raise the white flag.  Surrender and retreat.  Proven throughout history.

12 hours ago, Yagoda said:

And perhaps, since you have already confessed your ignorance, your reliance in the views of others, and your lack of interest in learning about the subject you seek to expound on, you should refrain from continuing to add nothing to the discussion except baseless ad hominems.

 

I asked for a summary, rather than spending a great deal of time wading through legislation and other items, no links were provided as per forum rules, request was ignored. As a reminder you are not a moderator, nor are personal attacks permitted.

5 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

I asked for a summary, rather than spending a great deal of time wading through legislation and other items, no links were provided as per forum rules, request was ignored. As a reminder you are not a moderator, nor are personal attacks permitted.

Says the man who posts regulat attacks on Trump supporters.

12 hours ago, G_Money said:

You seem to be digging yourself into a deeper hole with each post.

 

Why not do what the French do best.  Raise the white flag.  Surrender and retreat.  Proven throughout history.

Not tired of trolling?

 

BTW, do you agree with Yagoda that non-US citizen should refrain from posting on this thread? 😆

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Says the man who posts regulat attacks on Trump supporters.

Objections to MAGA ideology expressed, not the individual.

4 hours ago, candide said:

Not tired of trolling?

 

BTW, do you agree with Yagoda that non-US citizen should refrain from posting on this thread? 😆

English are allright they have a basic understanding of the politics and they speak the language. They know what if means.

 

 

11 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

Incorrect, covered extensively e.g. CNN and BBC.

Yes, they are concerned about Biden in that the left stands to lose power, but why did you edit my post to make it look like I said something I did not say. Typical leftist. 

 

What I said was: "It is worth noting that NOWHERE in the non-right media is anyone even the slightest bit concerned that Biden is not in a condition to be the leader of the free world, the only concern is with the election and the left maintaining its hold on power." 

 

5 hours ago, candide said:

Not tired of trolling?

 

BTW, do you agree with Yagoda that non-US citizen should refrain from posting on this thread? 😆

I do not.

 

The problem isn’t you posting.  It’s the context of your posts.

 

Best to do what the French do best. Give up.

Post removed for breaking forum rules.

 

Rule 28. You will not make changes to messages quoted from other members posts, except for purposes of shortening the quoted post. Do not shorten any post in a way that alters the context of the original post. Do not change the formatting of the post you are quoting.

51 minutes ago, G_Money said:

I do not.

 

The problem isn’t you posting.  It’s the context of your posts.

 

Best to do what the French do best. Give up.

That's rich from you! 😀

44 minutes ago, candide said:

That's rich from you! 😀

At least you agree with me.  🙂