.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Fishing boat capsizes in heavy storm off Trang, woman loses her life
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
14
Why is Russia such a cesspool?
That's correct. German rocket scientists captured by the Russians helped the Soviets develop theirs, just as the German rocket scientists captured by the Americans helped them. Does the name Wernher von Braun ring any bells for you? If you think the American developments in rockets and telecommunication satellites was not for military reasons I have a few bridges for sale, going cheap and barely used. -
103
Is it better to buy or rent property in Thailand as an expat?
The condo examples shown for Bangkok are indeed for long term if you check: Term of reservation : -1 year personal contract -3 months deposit -1 month rental in advance Also my mentioned next door neighbours house, which has been rented out for years, and I furthermore have an acquaintance that rents a condo here for 70k baht a month on long term...😉 -
-
30
Diarrhea Frequency & Treatment in SE Asia
I always get it in SEA unless I cook at home, don't eat street food but get it going to top Western restaurants -
14
Why is Russia such a cesspool?
Do try to get it right. Blame the British for inventing concentration camps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War_concentration_camps Between 18,000 and 26,000 women and children perished in these concentration camps due to diseases. -
123
Bangkok could be submerged in seven years warns economist
As I mentioned, some will remember the Bangkok and national flooding of 2011/12.It is predicted that this year could be a repeat as La Nina is also a factor....the truth is that Bangkok already IS flooding, it's not a prediction , it is a reality. The problem is perception - people think it will be a constant rise like filling up a bathtub. But in reality it will be a series of ups and downs over the next few yr=ears increasing in frequency and intensity. Form an economic point of view, land that is repeated underwater will become less and less valuable - as Honda demonstrated in 2011 the factory closed for 6 months. It eventually is being closed down.... just moving the "capital" is not a solution - the plains and delta on which Bangkok is built and developed will have to find a long term solution for the entire economy of the region. Meanwhile authorities, real estate agents, businesses and developers are keeping their heads in the sand (or rater mud) as an admitions without a planr could spell economic disaster for the nation. -
33
looking for specific language learning tool // reading
I've been messing with reading/writing/speaking Thai for several years. I'm probably an intermediate intermediate level. I tired of many of the same old reading lesson that I found on traditional Thai language sites. Several months ago, I started using chatgpt. It's magic. You can see some of my links here: -
4
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Wednesday 28 August 2024
Man Arrested for Raping 11-Year-Old Girl While Drunk Picture courtesy: Khaosod In a shocking case, a 23-year-old man from Bangkok has been arrested for allegedly raping an 11-year-old girl. The suspect, Watchara, also known as Top, lured the young girl under the pretence of taking her to see her brother, who was fishing nearby. He then sexually assaulted her, later claiming he was drunk during the incident. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1336639-man-arrested-for-raping-11-year-old-girl-while-drunk/ -
0
Man Arrested for Raping 11-Year-Old Girl While Drunk
Picture courtesy: Khaosod In a shocking case, a 23-year-old man from Bangkok has been arrested for allegedly raping an 11-year-old girl. The suspect, Watchara, also known as Top, lured the young girl under the pretence of taking her to see her brother, who was fishing nearby. He then sexually assaulted her, later claiming he was drunk during the incident. The arrest took place on August 26, at around 11 am. Police Major General Prasong Anamanee, along with senior officers from the Metropolitan Police Division 9, apprehended Watchara in front of a house in the Bang Khae district of Bangkok. This arrest was made based on a warrant issued on August 23. Watchara faces multiple serious charges, including raping a child under 13, taking a child under 15 for lewd purposes, and removing a child under 15 from their guardian for indecent reasons. The investigation began after the girl’s mother filed a complaint on the evening of July 22. According to her, Watchara had lived in the same area on Phetkasem Road, Bang Khae, and had coaxed her daughter, Miss A, under false pretenses. The mother reported that Watchara punched her daughter in the stomach three times before raping her. Following the assault, the girl suffered severe stomach pains. Watchara fled to a relative’s house nearby but was eventually tracked down and arrested by the police. During questioning, Watchara confessed to the crime, admitting he was drunk at the time. "I was drunk and made her take off her clothes before molesting her," he said. It was also revealed that Watchara has a criminal history, having been prosecuted for trespassing in 2020. To confirm the assault, the police have sent Miss A for a medical examination, and legal proceedings against Watchara are currently underway. "We are committed to ensuring that justice is served and that the victim receives all the necessary support and care," remarked one of the officers involved in the case. This incident has shocked the local community and highlighted the need for increased vigilance and stricter laws to protect minors from such heinous acts. -- 2024-08-28 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe- 1
-
-
103
Is it better to buy or rent property in Thailand as an expat?
I’ll never forget renting a fantastic condo in a small building in Phuket.,I was very happy there, until one day they filled in the rice fields behind me and made a road , and on the road there were bars and small restaurants spouting smoke and odeurs and loud music all night. I cried.Had to move. It wasn’t for sale, but if it had been I’d have bought it. So in 40 yrs of Thailand I have never bought , suits me, can go where I want, skip the country for South America now and again and rent a storage unit while I’m gone. Rent is cheap enough. -
30
Diarrhea Frequency & Treatment in SE Asia
Thailand has some stuff called flying rabbit that seems to work pretty good. Found in pretty much all pharmacies everywhere in Thailand. Not sure if that is it's official name but that is what everyone calls it because of the logo. -
0
Can Keir Starmer's Path Illuminate Kamala Harris’s Journey to Power?
When Vice President Kamala Harris confidently declared, “you can always trust me to put country above party,” during a recent speech in Chicago, her words struck a chord not just in the United States but across the Atlantic in Britain. The sentiment echoed the rhetoric that Britain's Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, employed throughout his successful bid to lead the Labour Party to power earlier this summer. This shared approach is more than a coincidence; it reflects deeper parallels between the two leaders—both former public prosecutors who transitioned into the political arena, each with a steadfast commitment to the rule of law. Starmer and Harris have both softened or moderated some of their earlier political stances as they seek to broaden the appeal of their respective parties. Starmer, now at the helm of Britain’s Labour Party, faced a volatile political environment shortly after his victory, marked by anti-immigrant riots triggered by a deadly knife attack at a children’s dance class. The incident, exacerbated by false claims spread by far-right groups that the assailant was a Muslim asylum seeker, tested Starmer’s ability to maintain law and order. In reality, the attacker was born in Britain to Rwandan Christian parents, a fact that underscored the dangerous misinformation that can fuel unrest. Similarly, Harris may encounter significant challenges if she defeats former President Donald Trump in a close race, particularly if Trump or his supporters dispute the election results. “These are different countries with different political systems, but there often seem to be parallels in their political trajectories,” noted Steven Fielding, an emeritus professor of political history at the University of Nottingham, drawing attention to the similar paths these two leaders are navigating. Labour's recent electoral victory in Britain has been closely studied by political strategists in the United States, particularly within the Democratic Party. Labour and the Democrats have a history of exchanging strategies, a tradition dating back to the era of Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. At the Democratic National Convention, members of Starmer’s political brain trust, including Jonathan Ashworth, Morgan McSweeney, and Matthew Doyle, were in high demand, sharing insights from Labour’s successful campaign. Ashworth, a close ally of Starmer and a former Labour member of Parliament, was part of the British delegation that provided key takeaways, emphasizing both the successes and the pitfalls Labour encountered. Ashworth’s experience also served as a cautionary tale. He unexpectedly lost his seat due to backlash over Labour’s handling of the Gaza conflict, with critics arguing that the party was too slow in condemning the killing of Palestinian civilians. Drawing from his experience, Ashworth warned Democrats against complacency, particularly in light of the Gaza protests in Chicago, which, although not as disruptive as anticipated, still carried significant political implications. “The anger was not captured in the polling; it wasn’t really captured in my street campaigning until the last few days,” Ashworth explained, underscoring the importance of vigilance in the face of unexpected voter sentiment. “They’ve got to make sure people don’t stay home because of Gaza.” On a more positive note, Ashworth observed similarities in how Starmer and Harris have addressed immigration, both emphasizing the importance of cracking down on criminal gangs that exploit and traffic migrants. Democratic pollster Geoff Garin, who advises Harris, pointed out that while there are common threads in voter behavior between the British and American elections, the strategies employed by Harris and Starmer have been organic to their respective campaigns. “The way Vice President Harris is meeting the moment is totally organic to her,” Garin said, “and I’m sure that is true of Prime Minister Starmer as well.” The last time Britain and the United States appeared to be aligned in their political rhythms was in 2016 when the Brexit vote in June foreshadowed Trump’s election that November. This year, the calendar similarly aligns, with Britons going to the polls in July, just five months before the U.S. presidential election. However, until President Biden’s unexpected withdrawal from the race last month, the political outcomes in the two countries seemed to be diverging. Now, with Harris's swift rise, political analysts are speculating whether the left-of-center victory in Britain could signal a similar outcome in the United States. There are, however, significant differences between the two political landscapes. Trump is polling neck and neck with Harris, both nationally and in several key swing states. In contrast, Labour held a consistent double-digit lead over the incumbent Conservative Party for 18 months before the British election. Starmer ran as a challenger against a deeply unpopular government, whereas Harris, though she represents the Biden administration, faces a polarizing challenger who has also served in the White House. Professor Fielding highlighted the contrast between Britain’s winner-takes-all system, which amplified Labour's majority, and America’s electoral college. “Harris could get a majority of the popular vote and still lose,” he noted, pointing to the complexities of the U.S. electoral system. Despite the different mechanics of their political races, both Labour and the Democratic Party have resonated with similar themes. The “country above party” rhetoric is designed to challenge the traditional claim of Conservatives and Republicans to patriotism. Labour’s decision to open its conference in Liverpool last October by singing the national anthem, “God Save the King,” marked a significant moment in British politics, mirroring the patriotic display in Chicago where American flags dominated the scene, a spectacle typically associated with the GOP. Both Starmer and Harris have also shown a willingness to shift their political stances. Starmer, who campaigned for the Labour leadership in 2020 on a more left-wing platform, adopted a more centrist approach during the recent election campaign. This included suspending Labour ministers who opposed his decision not to abolish a cap on child welfare payments. Similarly, Harris has toughened her stance on border policy and reversed her opposition to fracking as she seeks to appeal to a broader electorate. Both leaders have been cautious campaigners, steering clear of divisive issues. In Britain, this approach is known as the “Ming vase strategy,” a term coined to describe Tony Blair’s careful handling of his lead before the 1997 vote, likening him to a man carrying a priceless Ming vase across a highly polished floor. However, there is no clear blueprint for Harris to counter Trump’s populist message, which bears similarities to the rhetoric of Nigel Farage and Britain’s hard-right Reform U.K. party. Reform U.K. garnered over four million votes, fueled by anti-immigrant sentiments, which in Britain culminated in violent riots. Observers are now questioning how Harris, given her background as a prosecutor, would handle post-election unrest, particularly if it mirrors the challenges faced by Starmer. Encouraged by Starmer, British authorities responded to the riots with mass arrests, detaining over 1,000 individuals and charging more than 700. Harris, who shares Starmer’s left-of-center instincts, has positioned herself as a staunch defender of the rule of law, accusing Trump of inciting the January 6th insurrection and portraying him as a repeat lawbreaker. “What if, instead of another Jan. 6, we have a series of right-wing riots around immigration?” pondered Harold Hongju Koh, a Yale Law School professor and former legal official in the Obama administration, who has also taught at Oxford. “It’s really about what Kamala Harris would do.” As both Harris and Starmer navigate their respective political landscapes, the parallels in their journeys offer a fascinating glimpse into the challenges and strategies of modern leadership. Their shared backgrounds as prosecutors, coupled with their commitment to law and order, underscore the complex and often volatile nature of contemporary politics. Whether Harris can draw inspiration from Starmer’s recent victory remains to be seen, but their similar trajectories suggest that the lessons learned in one political arena may well resonate in another. Credit: NYT 2024-08-28 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Austrian Surgeon Allegedly Allows Teenage Daughter to Participate in Skull Surgery
A shocking case has emerged from Austria, where a surgeon is accused of allowing his teenage daughter to participate in a critical surgical procedure on a patient. The incident, which has drawn significant attention and outrage, reportedly occurred in January following a severe accident in a forest. The 33-year-old male patient had been involved in a forestry accident and was airlifted to Graz University Hospital in Styria, southeastern Austria, with serious head injuries. Due to the severity of his condition, the patient required immediate emergency surgery. However, what unfolded in the operating room that day is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the Graz public prosecutor's office. According to Kronen Zeitung, an Austrian newspaper, the surgeon allegedly permitted his 13-year-old daughter to take part in the surgery, a procedure that should have been performed by trained and qualified professionals only. The newspaper reported that the teenage girl even drilled a hole in the patient's skull, a task that demands precision, expertise, and a profound understanding of human anatomy. Although the operation reportedly proceeded without any immediate complications, the ramifications have been far-reaching. The patient, who has been left unable to work since the incident, only became aware of the situation months later. The victim was initially oblivious to the fact that a teenage girl had been involved in his surgery. It wasn't until April that an anonymous complaint was lodged with the public prosecutor's office, bringing the allegations to light. Shockingly, it took until July for the patient to be informed by police that he was the individual involved in the case. The gravity of the situation has led to the dismissal of the surgeon and another employee, a specialist who was present during the operation. The decision to allow an unqualified individual, particularly a minor, to participate in such a critical medical procedure has sparked widespread condemnation. The alleged victim’s lawyer, Peter Freiberger, expressed his client's disbelief and outrage over the situation. "You lie there. Unwilling, unconscious, and become guinea pigs. There's probably no other way to put it... that's not possible. You can't do that," Freiberger stated, reflecting the deep sense of violation felt by the patient. He emphasized that responsibility for this incident extends to everyone present during the surgery, pointing out that the hospital has not reached out to the patient following these revelations. "There was no contact, no explanation or apology, nothing. That is simply undignified," Freiberger added, highlighting the hospital's lack of accountability and communication. Medical professionals have also voiced their disbelief at the situation. Manfred Bogner, a specialist in trauma surgery, expressed his astonishment that a child was allowed to perform such a delicate and dangerous procedure. "An operating theatre belongs to people who have a job to do there and no one else," Bogner said, stressing the sanctity and professionalism required in a surgical environment. He further remarked, "And a child should not be given a drill and allowed to drill away at the bone of a seriously injured person." The case has raised serious questions about medical ethics, patient safety, and the responsibilities of healthcare professionals. The fact that the alleged victim had to learn about his own involvement in such a case through the media and later through police notification underscores the gravity of the breach of trust. The ongoing investigation by the public prosecutor's office is expected to shed more light on how such an egregious lapse in judgment could occur and what systemic failures may have contributed to it. Graz University Hospital, where the incident took place, has yet to issue a public statement regarding the allegations. The lack of communication from the hospital has further fueled public concern and anger, as many question how such an incident could have been allowed to happen in a reputable medical institution. As the investigation continues, the medical community and the public at large are left grappling with the implications of this disturbing case. The involvement of a minor in a surgical procedure raises profound ethical questions and highlights the need for strict adherence to professional standards in healthcare. The outcome of this case may well set a precedent for how similar situations are handled in the future, and it underscores the importance of protecting patients' rights and safety above all else. Credit: Sky News 2024-08-28 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
The Shadow of Revenge: Putin's Inevitable Turn Toward Britain
In the stillness of an October night in 2022, a covert operation unfolded within the sacred confines of St Catherine’s Cathedral in Kherson. Russian specialist troops and officials, acting under orders from Vladimir Putin, exhumed the remains of Grigory Potemkin, a revered 18th-century Russian commander closely associated with Empress Catherine the Great. Potemkin's legacy is deeply intertwined with the annexation of Crimea in 1783, and his remains were spirited away to an undisclosed location—perhaps Moscow or Crimea. This seemingly symbolic act reveals a profound insight into the motivations of the Russian president. It is a stark reminder that Putin’s actions are deeply rooted in history and in Russia’s perceived place within it. Throughout the years leading up to the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, I found myself repeatedly challenging the national security establishment’s understanding of Putin. Despite the intelligence reports and the assurances of seasoned experts, I argued that Putin was not guided by rationality or a desire to transform Russia into a modern, outward-looking nation. Instead, he is driven by a complex blend of revenge, legacy, and romanticism. The former KGB officer, along with his inner circle of Siloviki—comprising current and former members of Russia’s security services—harbors a deep-seated belief that the West is responsible for the Soviet Union's downfall. In their view, they are not the architects of the Soviet Union’s demise but rather its victims, ensnared by a Western conspiracy. This belief distorts their perception of history, leading them to assert that, if not for the West's influence, Russia would have emerged as the sole victor of World War II. Moreover, they contend that the Cold War need never have occurred because Eastern Europe, including East Germany and Poland, would have willingly remained under Moscow’s control. This revisionist narrative is prominently featured in a peculiar essay penned by Putin in June 2021, titled *The Real Lessons of the 75th Anniversary of World War II*. The essay is a masterclass in historical distortion, presenting a version of events that glorifies Russia as the world’s savior. Putin goes so far as to claim that the Nazi-Soviet pact, which facilitated the invasion and partition of Poland, somehow benefited the United Kingdom. In his attempt to recast Russia's role in the Second World War, Putin places the blame squarely on Britain and France, while conveniently ignoring the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact’s true implications. He omits crucial historical atrocities, such as the 1940 Katyn massacre, in which the Red Army and Soviet secret police executed approximately 20,000 Polish nationals. Furthermore, he glosses over the fact that, prior to the invasion of Poland, the Soviet Union had engaged in joint military exercises with the Wehrmacht and supplied tanks to Nazi Germany. This essay, while offering little in terms of factual accuracy, provides invaluable insight into Putin’s worldview and the historical grievances that fuel his actions. Almost a year later, in July 2022, Putin authored another essay, *On the Historical Unity of Russia and Ukrainians*. This piece combines elements of ethnic nationalism and historical romanticism, reminiscent of both *Mein Kampf* and a Walter Scott novel. It would be easy to dismiss this essay as the ravings of a leader disconnected from reality, but to do so would be to overlook its significance. Within its pages lie the clues to Putin’s next moves and the ideological underpinnings of his aggressive foreign policy. Unfortunately, many so-called “Russian experts” within the Foreign Office, the Quai d’Orsay, and the US State Department failed to grasp the importance of these writings. The shadow of the Iraq War had rendered intelligence services overly cautious, with analysis often diluted by bureaucratic processes that removed the crucial “human factor.” As a result, key insights from mid-level intelligence officers, those who had spent decades studying the enemy, were often sidelined, depriving decision-makers of the nuanced understanding needed to anticipate Putin’s actions. The 2016 Chilcot Report on the Iraq War highlighted the pitfalls of over-reliance on sanitized intelligence, warning of the dangers of assessing adversaries through a lens shaped by our own motivations rather than theirs. But it is not just the job of intelligence analysts to understand the adversary; politicians, too, must possess the ability to read people and comprehend their motives. Leaders who fail to “feel” the currents of international relations are ill-suited for the responsibilities they bear. My own experience meeting with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and General Valery Gerasimov in the days leading up to the invasion of Ukraine reaffirmed the importance of this human understanding. I did not go to Moscow to merely deliver a prepared script; I went to gauge the character and intentions of my adversaries. I sought to uncover the extent of their deceptions, the size of their egos, and the dynamics within their inner circle. As I departed, I remarked to General Gerasimov that I had noticed a shift in Russian military doctrine, one that prioritized readiness and mobilization over sheer numbers. In response, another Russian general leaned in and added, “and ruthless intimidation.” In that moment, the mask slipped, revealing the true nature of the regime I was dealing with. The most telling exchange occurred as General Gerasimov walked me to the hallway and remarked, “Never again will we be humiliated. We used to be the fourth army in the world, now we are the first or second. It is us and the Americans.” These words encapsulate the mindset of Russia’s leadership—a leadership intent on rewriting history to erase the humiliations they associate with the end of the Cold War. For them, settling scores that have festered for centuries is not just a matter of national pride but a mission to restore Russia’s rightful place in the world. Yet, as Russia’s ongoing actions continue to isolate and degrade it on the international stage, it is clear that the regime’s efforts are only serving to further humiliate itself. However, in Putin’s distorted worldview, Britain, not the United States, stands at the heart of Russia’s perceived failures. From the Crimean War to the defeat of the Czars, from the rise of Hitler to the end of the Soviet Union, Britain is seen as the architect of Russia’s misfortunes. A senior member of the Russian Siloviki even went so far as to claim that “we know Britain is behind the invasion of Kursk”—a baseless assertion that nonetheless illustrates the extent of the paranoia that pervades the Kremlin. Make no mistake: Putin has set his sights on Britain. His belief that we are responsible for Russia’s historical grievances places us squarely in his crosshairs. The Kremlin’s war machine, driven by a desire for revenge and a twisted interpretation of history, will eventually turn its focus on us. We must be prepared for the inevitable. The signs are all there, and it would be a grave mistake to ignore them. As Putin continues to rewrite history, we must remain vigilant, ready to counter his moves and protect our nation from the threats that lie ahead. Rt Hon Ben Wallace is a former UK secretary of state for defence Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-28 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
The Philippines Calls Out China as the Biggest Threat to Regional Peace
In a powerful statement underscoring the growing tension in Southeast Asia, the Philippine Defense Secretary, Gilberto Teodoro, has labeled China as the "biggest disruptor" of peace in the region. This accusation comes amidst escalating confrontations between Manila and Beijing over the contested reefs and waters of the South China Sea. Teodoro's comments were made at a conference hosted by the US Indo-Pacific Command, where he highlighted the increasing frequency of encounters between Philippine and Chinese vessels over the past year. The South China Sea, a critical maritime route and resource-rich area, has long been the subject of conflicting territorial claims. However, Beijing's assertive stance, which dismisses the claims of other nations, including the Philippines, and disregards an international ruling that invalidates its claims, has exacerbated tensions in the region. China’s expansive claims over the South China Sea encompass areas well within the Philippines' Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), which stretches approximately 370 kilometers from its coastline. Despite the Philippines’ legal rights to these areas, China has continued to assert control, sending patrol boats and constructing artificial islands, which it has subsequently militarized to reinforce its dominance. Teodoro minced no words as he declared, "China ... is the biggest disruptor of international peace in the ASEAN region." His reference to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) highlights the broader implications of China’s actions, which extend beyond just the Philippines to impact regional stability as a whole. The militarization of the artificial islands and the aggressive patrolling of the waters serve as daily reminders of the ongoing dispute and the potential for further escalation. In a call to action, Teodoro urged the international community to denounce China’s "illegal acts" and exert pressure on Beijing to cease its aggressive maneuvers. "We need a collective consensus and a strong call out against China," he stated, emphasizing the need for a unified response to what he termed as a struggle "against a more powerful adversary." The plea for collective action underscores the asymmetry in power between the Philippines and China, with the latter possessing far greater military and economic resources. Teodoro's remarks came on the heels of yet another incident in the disputed waters, where China claimed to have taken "control measures" against two Philippine Coast Guard vessels near Sabina Shoal in the Spratly Islands. The Philippine Coast Guard had dispatched the ships to resupply another vessel stationed at the reef, but they were compelled to abort the mission due to China's overwhelming deployment of ships and adverse sea conditions. Commodore Jay Tarriela, a spokesman for the Philippine Coast Guard, recounted the event, describing China’s actions as "excessive" and indicative of its determination to assert control over the area. Sabina Shoal, situated 140 kilometers west of the Philippine island of Palawan and roughly 1,200 kilometers from China’s Hainan island, has become a focal point of recent confrontations. Both the Philippines and China have stationed coast guard vessels in the vicinity, heightening fears in Manila that Beijing may be preparing to construct another artificial island, as it has done in other parts of the South China Sea. The construction of such an island would not only solidify China’s physical presence in the area but also further complicate the already volatile situation. Relations between the Philippines and China have continued to deteriorate under the administration of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who has taken a more assertive stance against Chinese actions in the disputed waters. The increasing friction has led to a series of confrontations, the most notable of which occurred in June when a Philippine sailor lost a thumb during an altercation with Chinese coast guard forces. The incident, which took place near Second Thomas Shoal, another contested area in the Spratlys, also saw Chinese forces confiscate or destroy Philippine equipment, including firearms. These developments illustrate the precarious nature of the situation in the South China Sea, where the potential for conflict looms large. The actions of China, as perceived by the Philippines, are not just violations of international law but are also viewed as direct threats to the sovereignty and security of Southeast Asian nations. The repeated confrontations and the aggressive posturing by Beijing have not only strained diplomatic relations but have also raised the stakes in an already complex geopolitical environment. Teodoro’s characterization of China as the primary disruptor of peace in the ASEAN region is likely to resonate with other countries that have similar grievances against Beijing’s assertive tactics. The call for a collective response is a strategic move, aiming to galvanize international support and apply diplomatic pressure on China to alter its course. However, the path to achieving such a consensus remains fraught with challenges, given China’s significant influence and the varying degrees of dependence and relations other ASEAN countries have with Beijing. As the situation continues to evolve, the world watches closely, aware that the South China Sea is not just a regional issue but one with global implications. The outcome of this ongoing dispute will likely set a precedent for how similar conflicts are managed in the future, particularly in areas where international law and power dynamics intersect. The Philippines, under Teodoro's guidance, appears determined to stand its ground, but the road ahead is uncertain, and the potential for further disruption remains a serious concern. Credit: CNA 2024-08-28 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now