Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, lavender19 said:

And have you seen the AI generated photos of the supposed crowds at rallies. Not even good AI. Some guy has four arms. And still the idiots believe it. 

Indeed I have

  • Sad 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, lavender19 said:

And have you seen the AI generated photos of the supposed crowds at rallies. Not even good AI. Some guy has four arms. And still the idiots believe it. 

 

I've seen the same ones....... one guy had three legs and another had trotters for hands....who are they trying to kid?......can't find the photos just now....I'll post them all later.....

  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

I've seen the same ones....... one guy had three legs and another had trotters for hands....who are they trying to kid?......can't find the photos just now....I'll post them all later.....


Thanks, but no more fake photos of Trump rallies showing large crowds please. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, FriscoKid said:


Thanks, but no more fake photos of Trump rallies showing large crowds please. 

 

Taken the day before the MAGA rally for the janitorial crew's yearbook - all Democrats of course.

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, lavender19 said:

And have you seen the AI generated photos of the supposed crowds at rallies. Not even good AI. Some guy has four arms. And still the idiots believe it. 

Yes I examined some of Trump rallies , lil clusters of AI sprinkled thru out 

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Irish star said:

Maybe open your ears , What’s Trumps Policies, Mass Deportations, Grift , Putin Kim Adoration, Christofascistism, Denying Voting ,Roe Wade  , you are a Woman ,are you Not

Trump has 20

Kamala 0

 

:cheesy:

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, FriscoKid said:


Thanks, but no more fake photos of Trump rallies showing large crowds please. 

Trump going down , he hasn’t paid any Rally sites he couldn’t even land in Bozeman , SC said he has to pay in Advance,Lara robbing RNC funds to get him a Legal Team ,he can’t Bully and Terrify The Cult with these lil crowds , Vance turnout was Abysmal , Just watching it Burn , Finally the Grifter is off to Venezuela but we know The Kremlin 

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 hours ago, riclag said:

Kamala Harris reportedly manipulating news headlines in Google search.

'Outnumbered' panelists react to the recent Axios report.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6360422007112

 
Wake up people , its getting ridiculous!

 

 

 

 

 


 

Faux News? They might not be around much longer after the upcoming huge lawsuit. They lost the last big one and will lose this one also. All liars. Sad you fall for it

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Roo Island said:

Faux News? They might not be around much longer after the upcoming huge lawsuit. They lost the last big one and will lose this one also. All liars. Sad you fall for it

Billions in profits :cheesy:

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, susanlea said:

More lies

You really don't want to know the truth. Or, you are just trolling.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/11/media/fox-corp-board-subpoena-smartmatic-lawsuit/index.html

 

Four Fox Corporation board members have been subpoenaed in voting technology company Smartmatic’s $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News over its airing of 2020 election lies, alleging executives at the right-wing cable channel’s parent company knew it was spreading false claims.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, susanlea said:

Billions in profits :cheesy:

 You have mixed up income with profitability I think.

 

But still profitable.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/14/trump-harris-edit-headlines-google-ads

 

The Harris campaign isn't breaking any rules with the ads, which link out to actual news stories but display headlines favorable to Harris. These types of ads are common on Google, have been used by other political campaigns, and don't violate Google's policies, as Axios reported.

 

No, the Harris team has re-written the headlines to make them appear favourable to Harris and then presents them as if the reputable news outlets, like the Independent, had written those headlines. It is diabolical misinformation and propaganda, of the kind Goebbels may have thought up, and The Independent not only condemns it in the strongest terms, but will have these "ads" removed. Good on them.

 

"A spokesperson for The Independent condemned the practice: “It is entirely wrong for anyone to put fake headlines under The Independent brand. We object fiercely and believe it is undermining of what politics and journalism should be about. It is misleading to muddle fake headlines with any campaign trying to persuade people to vote in an election, and must be widely condemned. We will be seeking their removal.”"

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-google-ad-campaign-b2596410.html

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, the Harris team has re-written the headlines to make them appear favourable to Harris and then presents them as if the reputable news outlets, like the Independent, had written those headlines. It is diabolical misinformation and propaganda, of the kind Goebbels may have thought up, and The Independent not only condemns it in the strongest terms, but will have these "ads" removed. Good on them.

 

"A spokesperson for The Independent condemned the practice: “It is entirely wrong for anyone to put fake headlines under The Independent brand. We object fiercely and believe it is undermining of what politics and journalism should be about. It is misleading to muddle fake headlines with any campaign trying to persuade people to vote in an election, and must be widely condemned. We will be seeking their removal.”"

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-google-ad-campaign-b2596410.html

Kamala is a fake person

  • Agree 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, the Harris team has re-written the headlines to make them appear favourable to Harris and then presents them as if the reputable news outlets, like the Independent, had written those headlines. It is diabolical misinformation and propaganda, of the kind Goebbels may have thought up, and The Independent not only condemns it in the strongest terms, but will have these "ads" removed. Good on them.

 

"A spokesperson for The Independent condemned the practice: “It is entirely wrong for anyone to put fake headlines under The Independent brand. We object fiercely and believe it is undermining of what politics and journalism should be about. It is misleading to muddle fake headlines with any campaign trying to persuade people to vote in an election, and must be widely condemned. We will be seeking their removal.”"

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-google-ad-campaign-b2596410.html

No. It's as roo island wrote, the headlines were created to appear next to stories. Not rewritten.

Questionable practice, imo yes, but allowed, has been done before and legal.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, stevenl said:

No. It's as roo island wrote, the headlines were created to appear next to stories. Not rewritten.

Questionable practice, imo yes, but allowed, has been done before and legal.

 

They re-wrote the headlines and then try to deceive readers into believing the reputable new outlet had written those headlines ("It is entirely wrong for anyone to put fake headlines under The Independent brand."). This is deception and simple propaganda. If there was nothing wrong with it The Independent would not be so incensed and seek to have these ads removed.

 

Yes, legal, but so is prostitution, it doesn't mean it's not lamentable. The issue is they are deceiving the reader into believing The Independent wrote the doctored headline, not the Harris team, as is actually the case.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Again, no. Read the axios article, it's explained in there.

 

Again, yes. The headlines are changed and then the ad is presented as if The Guardian or The Independent wrote it. It is deceptive.

 

The Guardian too will seek the removal of those ads.

 

“While we understand why an organization might wish to align itself with The Guardian’s trusted brand, we need to ensure it is being used appropriately and with our permission. We’ll be reaching out to Google for more information about this practice,” a Guardian spokesperson told Axios."

 

https://www.fastcompany.com/91173357/kamala-harris-ad-controversy-explained

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...