Jump to content

Is the Tax compliance going to be linked to Visa issuance ?


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Yumthai said:

 

 

 

If ever questioned, the husband's got cash savings at home.

He could have brought up to 15K USD undeclared from each trip abroad for years.

 

I know someone who actually did this.

Now, how to prove he has these cash savings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lorry said:

I know someone who actually did this.

Now, how to prove he has these cash savings?

I'm not saying I'm in this situation but I know many people mainly old chaps living from cash they bring in Thailand. They've never been questioned about the source of their money but it's off topic.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theblether said:

 

He could always try the "tooth fairy leaves money under my pillow every night" defence. 

 

I'm sure that will work. :coffee1:

Seriously.

One friend brought almost 100,000 US cash. At least,  he got a certificate from customs. 

Another friend did exactly what yumthai said, always brought several thousand.  Keepin it well hidden under his mattress and waiting for the baht to depreciate :tongue:

These people do exist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The safest person in this tax mess is the pensioner who has his pension remitted to Thailand every month, the TRD loves this guy because nothing is hidden, everything's in plain view and there are no open questions. The "carry cash on the plane", "my wife supports me" and, "I won it at the border casino, those guys are in for some pain at some point.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chiang mai said:

The "carry cash on the plane", "my wife supports me" and, "I won it at the border casino, those guys are in for some pain at some point.

Maybe, maybe not. Thailand has still a looooong way to go in term of Law enforcement.

 

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lorry said:

Seriously.

One friend brought almost 100,000 US cash. At least,  he got a certificate from customs. 

Another friend did exactly what yumthai said, always brought several thousand.  Keepin it well hidden under his mattress and waiting for the baht to depreciate :tongue:

These people do exist. 

 

I remember a report here a few years ago by a member saying his pal was caught with $29,000 undeclared at Swampy. He ended up buying his way out of the problem. 

 

If you are transporting buckshee money, take legit money from your account and get a receipt.  Pay the legit money back into the account the next day and keep the receipt. 

 

So when you arrive with buckshee cash you have a receipt to cover the total. 

 

I know plenty of cash-in-hand tradesmen here in the UK that do exactly that. 

 

I'm as pure as the driven snow so it doesn't apply to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lorry said:

@CapraIbex has written 

a 'monetary gift contract' drafted by a Thai lawyer, specifying that the gift is genuine and intended solely for my wife's benefit, and detailing the purpose of the gift (such as purchasing government or corporate bonds, a car, building a house, or anniversaries) with my wife also drafting a 'gift acceptance contract,' "

 

I would add the occasion of the gift (even if not necessary between spouses, according to the letter of the law), and have gift contract for each gift.

 

As far as you know, would that be sufficient?

Neither the specific purpose of the gift (it would actually negate the required terms)

nor the occasion for the gift are required between spouses.

 

if you PM me I can give a recommendation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CharlieH said:

Why do people always think they can outsmart the tax authorities by nitpicking over minor technicalities? The tax department are the experts, and it's ultimately up to them to decide what's acceptable. Trying to deceive or outmaneuver them is a pointless effort!

I disagree. 

 

There have been many companies and wealthy individuals that have taken on tax departments in Court and won their case.  It happens all around the world, with many end up being test cases for those to follow.   

 

They scare those without the financial ability to take them on in Court, but many companies and wealthy people have had judgements in their favor at Court, and the tax payer has had to pick up the legal tab for the public servant's incompetence, because the loser pays. 

 

I'm Australian, and at one point in time, this guy was Australia's richest man.  When the government found out he paid little to no tax one year, it hit the media.  

 

He sums it up perfectly, and expats in Thailand should be thinking the same way, particularly as we have no rights here.   

 

 

  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, theblether said:

 

Incorrect. The husband will be ASKED TO PROVE HOW HE IS SUPPORTING HIMSELF. 

 

This is so obvious I am amazed it hasn't occurred to people. 

Who will ask this question, when, and where, and what enforcement may follow? 

 

Not saying it can not / will not happen, because as I have said, it's going to be funny in 2025 with all these foreigners having 800k in the bank, but nothing else  appearing to be flowing through their bank account. 

 

Just interested in how you think the Thai authorities will go about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lorry said:

It has occurred to many people in the various tax threads, written many times. 

 

 

Very true.

 

All will be revealed in 2025, and I dare say, in following years, they will close the loopholes that they discover many have been using. 

 

Basically, this policy could evolve to tighten up.  

 

I expect these tax threads to keep evolving in the same way. 

 

What's allowed in 2025, may not be allowed in 2026, and what's allowed in 2026, may not be allowed in 2027. 

 

Times are changing.  Computer data bases are now talking to each other, not just domestically, but internationally. 

 

It was inevitable, and Thailand has now got onboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Yumthai said:

I'm not saying I'm in this situation but I know many people mainly old chaps living from cash they bring in Thailand. They've never been questioned about the source of their money but it's off topic.

That's been most of us, hasn't it? 

 

The way I see it is, as it currently stands, by the letter of the law, and I know most don't even want to consider it, the only sure way to hold all the aces, so to speak, is to only do 179 days in Thailand in a calendar year. 

 

Do this, and you have zero to be concerned about. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lorry said:

Seriously.

One friend brought almost 100,000 US cash. At least,  he got a certificate from customs. 

Another friend did exactly what yumthai said, always brought several thousand.  Keepin it well hidden under his mattress and waiting for the baht to depreciate :tongue:

These people do exist. 

I wouldn't be pushing the boundary that hard. 

 

I'll bring in close to the threshold, actually, probably a little over, just to be seen to be on their books and paying something, but minimal. 

 

The rest will be brought in, through various forms, and I'll let them search for it and bill me for it, if they can, and do. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, chiang mai said:

The safest person in this tax mess is the pensioner who has his pension remitted to Thailand every month, the TRD loves this guy because nothing is hidden, everything's in plain view and there are no open questions. The "carry cash on the plane", "my wife supports me" and, "I won it at the border casino, those guys are in for some pain at some point.

Firstly, the safest person in this tax mess is the person staying less than 180 days, but sure, the 65k every month pensioner means a tax liability, and all the bureaucracy that goes with it. 

 

As another member hinted at, if some of that 65k is now taxed, they may raise the 65k to 70k.  Not scaremongering, just a possibility. 

 

You are correct though.  They will love these guys for their about 20k in tax every year, which they can't argue against.  Easy targets.  Money just sitting there for the take.

 

What about if these guys decide to pay and agent, and with what's leave out of would would have been their tax bill they have a short holiday in a neighboring country, at the TRD's expense, possibly bringing in some cash.  Could you blame them?   

Edited by KhunHeineken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Yumthai said:

Maybe, maybe not. Thailand has still a looooong way to go in term of Law enforcement.

 

It's called a re-entry permit for a reason. 

 

Are they going to question the cash in the pocket of every returning retirement visa holder, and if they did, if it's under the declarable amount, what's the offense? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, theblether said:

 

I remember a report here a few years ago by a member saying his pal was caught with $29,000 undeclared at Swampy. He ended up buying his way out of the problem. 

 

If you are transporting buckshee money, take legit money from your account and get a receipt.  Pay the legit money back into the account the next day and keep the receipt. 

 

So when you arrive with buckshee cash you have a receipt to cover the total. 

 

I know plenty of cash-in-hand tradesmen here in the UK that do exactly that. 

 

I'm as pure as the driven snow so it doesn't apply to me. 

Huh? 

 

Cash is cash.  You receive it, and don't put it into any account, anywhere, at any time.  

 

Cash economy 101. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, theblether said:

 

🤣🤣🤣

 

Outstanding post, hilarious. Cute you think that law is the issue here and not tea money. 

 

Wonderful. 

This one is bigger than "tea money." 

 

This one is about collecting money from the masses, in one way or another. 

Edited by KhunHeineken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

The people who are in trouble are the ones that gave up tax residency at home but never complied with tax residency here.

If one is staying in Thailand under 180 days a calendar year, they are not a resident for tax purposes, thus no tax compliance needed in Thailand.  

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, sometimewoodworker said:

Neither the specific purpose of the gift (it would actually negate the required terms)

nor the occasion for the gift are required between spouses.

 

if you PM me I can give a recommendation 

 

In the case where a monetary gift is given and received to / from overseas bank accounts, between spouses, and then remitted to Thailand by the gift recipient, do you see a need for the contract / documentation?

 

Especially since it was done overseas, logically cannot see how having it notarized by a Thai lawyer, in that case, would make sense? 

 

I expect the documentation is only needed, in the unlikely event this specific remittance is ever questioned. 

 

Assuming the gift is under the thresholds, it never gets declared,  it wasn't given / received in Thailand. The proceeds were simply remitted to Thailand. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, theblether said:

🤣🤣🤣

 

Outstanding post, hilarious. Cute you think that law is the issue here and not tea money. 

 

Wonderful. 

Indeed corruption is the inner problem, lax and inconsistent Law enforcement is just the direct consequence of it.

So, for all people hoping worrying believing Thailand will be able to successfully enforce their tax rules soon (as in the West), the only way they can achieve it is to drastically mitigate their tea money standards and law-bypassing services. Good luck with this one.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, sometimewoodworker said:

Neither the specific purpose of the gift (it would actually negate the required terms)

nor the occasion for the gift are required between spouses.

 

if you PM me I can give a recommendation 

Psst... I’ve got some highly classified intel on what you're dying to know, but trust me—it’s too hot for the public eye. PM me and bring a flashlight! nudge, nudge - wink, wink. LOL

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 243

      Israel Hamas War the Widening Middle East Conflict

    2. 243

      Israel Hamas War the Widening Middle East Conflict

    3. 47

      Health Supplements

    4. 0

      Robert Mueller Warns of Continued Russian Election Interference, US Remains Unprepared

    5. 0

      Russian Disinformation Campaign Targets Kamala Harris with False Accusations

    6. 0

      Trump: "President Biden was so nice." Civility During Flint Rally Amid Political Tensions

    7. 0

      Southern African Nations Turn to Elephant Culling Amid Drought to Feed Hungry Communities

    8. 0

      Whistleblower Testifies Titan Sub Tragedy Was 'Inevitable' Due to Ignored Safety Warnings

    9. 0

      BBC Admits Past Lapses in Addressing Celebrity Misconduct

    10. 0

      Kamala Harris Expresses Openness to Exploring Reparations for Slavery

    11. 0

      Ending the Ukraine War Before Nuclear Catastrophe

    12. 243

      Israel Hamas War the Widening Middle East Conflict

    13. 243

      Israel Hamas War the Widening Middle East Conflict

    14. 4

      Lopburi police conduct drug tests on public transport drivers

×
×
  • Create New...
""