Jump to content

King Charles: Australia's Future as a Republic Rests with Its People


Recommended Posts

Posted
48 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You were doing so well till you started with the insults.

I'm not the one insulting other posters from the safety of mummy's basement. You should see someone about your anger issues, IMO.

 

   There wasn't any insults , stop playing the victim 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/15/2024 at 4:19 PM, RuamRudy said:

 

We are not all snivelling, boot licking sheep. Whilst still a minority, more and more brits are questioning why we have this grotesque and utterly disfunctional family as our unelected and unaccountable head of state. 

Look at the heads, past and present,  of some of the Republics around the world. Have they done much better?

Posted
Just now, phetphet said:

Look at the heads, past and present,  of some of the Republics around the world. Have they done much better?

 

Of course not, but that's no reason to embrace entrenched, undemocratic entitlement so tightly. 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Old Croc said:

Mummy's basement!!

My mother never owned a basement (not common in Australia) and has been dead nearly as long as Kerr. 

I've been a member of this forum for nearly 20 years, have lived in Phuket and now Isaan for 15 years. I own property and residences in both places.

I think my assessment of you being somewhat short of factual opinions is not misplaced. You haven't seen my anger, you're just a lightweight know-it-all. 

Still with the insults! Is that all you have?

 

:coffee1:

 

Posted
15 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Of course not, but that's no reason to embrace entrenched, undemocratic entitlement so tightly. 

IMO 90% of the people on the planet don't care whether the head of state is elected, hereditary or imposed as it makes no difference to most- we all get screwed regardless.

  • Sad 1
Posted
On 10/18/2024 at 9:04 PM, Patong2021 said:

You can go and lecture the tens of thousands+ who will come out to welcome the King. 

The fact is that the Crown has acted on behalf of First Peoples and takes its role seriously. The role is still obviously needed since the Republicans have completely ignored the views and stated positions of the First People. Unlike the Australian occupiers, the King will receive a polite and hospitable reception from the  First People of Australia.

 

Looks like not everyone got your message. 

 

"King Charles faced shouts of "you are not my King" from an independent senator just after he finished an address at Australia's Parliament House on the second official day of his engagements in the country.

 

Thorpe, who is an independent senator from Victoria and an Aboriginal Australian woman, has long advocated for a treaty between Australia’s government and its first inhabitants."

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79n20r750po

  • Confused 1
Posted
5 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Looks like not everyone got your message. 

 

"King Charles faced shouts of "you are not my King" from an independent senator just after he finished an address at Australia's Parliament House on the second official day of his engagements in the country.

 

Thorpe, who is an independent senator from Victoria and an Aboriginal Australian woman, has long advocated for a treaty between Australia’s government and its first inhabitants."

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79n20r750po

A view and actions that have been condemned by an aboriginal elder who earlier welcomed the King and Queen. 

 

It's all there in the article. You cut your quote just short of that bit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...