Jump to content

Shocking Online Threats: Trans Woman Targets JK Rowling and Nancy Mace in Call to Violence


Recommended Posts

Posted
53 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Whoever it is who made these threats did so against British Author and a US Representative.

 

This ‘geezer’ or whoever it was that made these threats might not even be in the UK.


But I am somewhat pleased to learn you too believe there are limits ‘free speech’ and to what it is acceptable to post online.

 

 

Sherlock Holmes is not required here to ascertain location and political leanings of this individual. 

 

Since nobody in the UK would have any idea who Nancy Mace is then it would be a reasonable assumption this is an American.  Since leftists all use the same group think echo chambers for LBT2QGS+ issues, climate, Hamas, Trump, face masks, lockdowns etc then it is a safe bet this guy is a leftist and Harris supporter, no doubt with "be kind" in his bio on social media too.   Unlike the UK America has freedom of speech so I doubt anything would happen to this guy anyway, other than the appropriate bans from social media.  

  • Agree 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

Sherlock Holmes is not required here to ascertain location and political leanings of this individual. 

 

Since nobody in the UK would have any idea who Nancy Mace is then it would be a reasonable assumption this is an American.  Since leftists all use the same group think echo chambers for LBT2QGS+ issues, climate, Hamas, Trump, face masks, lockdowns etc then it is a safe bet this guy is a leftist and Harris supporter, no doubt with "be kind" in his bio on social media too.   Unlike the UK America has freedom of speech so I doubt anything would happen to this guy anyway, other than the appropriate bans from social media.  

I don’t know why you are telling me that, I’ve suggested in response to suggestions that the British Police might not investigate, that, on the basis of the chosen victims, ‘@Venuspeenis’ might not be in the UK.

 

Your anti leftist rant adds nothing of worth to the discussion.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And you scupper off when countless other examples are reported that undermine your self stroked grievance.

 

 

 

Feel free to provide an example of a left wing/Pro Labour/Pro immigration UK citizen being arrested, charged and jailed within a week for being "grossly offensive" on social media.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Feel free to provide an example of a left wing/Pro Labour/Pro immigration UK citizen being arrested, charged and jailed within a week for being "grossly offensive" on social media.


Arrested for breaking the law?

 

I’m at a loss to why you have a problem with that.

  • Confused 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


Arrested for breaking the law?

 

I’m at a loss to why you have a problem with that.

 

So you don't have any examples then? Didn't think so... 😆

 

I'm not talking about only being arrested. I'm talking arrested, charged and jailed within a week for causing gross offense. Got any examples of that where the poster is not white/right of centre? Didn't think so....😅

 

Is assaulting and breaking a policewoman's nose at Manchester Airport against the law? If so, why have they not been charged? Can you justify that? Didn't think so... 😆

 

We both know the answer, but feel free to continue with the gaslighting, it's crystal clear it's all you have at this point so don't be shy to confirm it. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

I disagree.  I feel its important to highlight the intolerance of leftists as for too long now this group have been claiming moral high ground when the intolerance is almost exclusively found on the left.  Bluesky is no doubt a cesspit of intolerance now since the leftists have moved over there.  

 

It really is just as well there is a 2 tier justice system in the UK as the prison population would double overnight if the same standards were applied to leftists as they are to those on the right.   

By displaying your own intolerance and pejorative views of the left?

 

I’m not sure you make the argument you think you make.

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

So you don't have any examples then? Didn't think so... 😆

 

I'm not talking about only being arrested. I'm talking arrested, charged and jailed within a week for causing gross offense. Got any examples of that where the poster is not white/right of centre? Didn't think so....😅

 

Is assaulting and breaking a policewoman's nose at Manchester Airport against the law? If so, why have they not been charged? Can you justify that? Didn't think so... 😆

 

We both know the answer, but feel free to continue with the gaslighting, it's crystal clear it's all you have at this point so don't be shy to confirm it. 

 

 

Jonny, 

 

it’s not for me to prove your claims correct, there is no proof of something that does not exist.

 

The swift crackdown on coordinated race riots across the country had the near a immediate affect of ending those race riots and the arson, looting, property damage and attacks on the entirely innocent community they were attacking.

 

It was exactly the right response.

 

Why you have a problem with it is a mystery.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny, 

 

it’s not for me to prove your claims correct, there is no proof of something that does not exist.

 

I have made claims and provided multiple examples to back them up.

 

You cannot provide any examples to disprove my claims. Neither can you provide evidence to backup up your own claims (despite claiming you aready had "countles other examples" about an hour ago). In case you forgot, here is your post...

 

image.png.77630932acee140ae204edd327637439.png

 

Have you misplaced these countless examples? I'm not scuppering off, I'm right here waiting for them. 

 

Is it possible you are just gaslighting again and in fact have nothing? 😅 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, JonnyF said:

 

I have made claims and provided multiple examples to back them up.

 

You cannot provide any examples to disprove my claims. Neither can you provide evidence to backup up your own claims (despite claiming you aready had "countles other examples" about an hour ago). In case you forgot, here is your post...

 

image.png.77630932acee140ae204edd327637439.png

 

Have you misplaced these countless examples? I'm not scuppering off, I'm right here waiting for them. 

 

Is it possible you are just gaslighting again and in fact have nothing? 😅 

 

Jonny, I and others frequently provide facts that undermine your claims.

 

I will continue to do so, I expect others will too.

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What neither of us know is who the person making these threats is, what their motivation was or their political affiliation, if any.

 

But we can have a look at the internet and see who shouts loudest about this issue.

And we can see who speaks up against them and we can see who does not say anything.

This all together gives us an idea who "these people" are.

 

Posted

Shouldn’t more Brits and others nationalities be responding to this thread?

 

If someone can pry them away from the US politics threads.

Posted
8 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And yet there is no evidence who ‘@Venuspeenis’ is, let alone their motivation or political affiliation.

 

Seems to be a left-wing trans activist, given what they said.  🤷‍♂️

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I'm not talking about only being arrested. I'm talking arrested, charged and jailed within a week for causing gross offense. Got any examples of that where the poster is not white/right of centre? Didn't think so....😅

 

Chomper lies constantly.  He'll start trolling you now that you've proven him wrong.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Chomper lies constantly.  He'll start trolling you now that you've proven him wrong.


Ah a personal attack and baseless accusation of lying.


We’ve been before haven’t we.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

But we can have a look at the internet and see who shouts loudest about this issue.

And we can see who speaks up against them and we can see who does not say anything.

This all together gives us an idea who "these people" are.

 

How does that fill the gaping hole in nobody here knowing who ‘@Venuspeenis’ is, what their motivation is or what their political affiliation are?


It would be so easy to admit you know non of these things, factual too.

 

But you struggle to do so.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted

"Venuspeenis" has been identified by one Web site as a 24-year-old trans activist who lives in Portland, Oregon and was previously active in Antifa.

https://thepostmillennial.com/andy-ngo-reports-portland-trantifa-extremist-who-issued-death-threats-against-nancy-mace-and-j-k-rowling-identified

 

Some background info and photos here:   https://ghostarchive.org/archive/hZxHC?wr=false

 

The video threat against Mace can be seen here:  https://voz.us/en/politics/241120/18331/nancy-mace-responds-to-trans-activist-s-death-threats-he-seems-like-really-nice-guy.html

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny, I and others frequently provide facts that undermine your claims.

 

I will continue to do so, I expect others will too.

 

I repeat. Where are your facts and evidence? 

 

Have you gone scurrying off?

 

One minute it's impossible to prove something that doesn't exist and the next minute you claim you posted evidence countless times. And then beg other posters to bail you out. 

 

So which is it? Make your mind up. It's impossible to do or you already did it?

 

I posted my clear examples of 2 tier justice. Where is your counter claim with similar examples? 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:


Ah a personal attack and baseless accusation of lying.


We’ve been before haven’t we.

 

Nope.  You took us to you making claims then refusing to back them up with evidence.  It's your MO.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

I repeat. Where are your facts and evidence? 

 

Have you gone scurrying off?

 

One minute it's impossible to prove something that doesn't exist and the next minute you claim you posted evidence countless times. And then beg other posters to bail you out. 

 

So which is it? Make your mind up. It's impossible to do or you already did it?

 

I posted my clear examples of 2 tier justice. Where is your counter claim with similar examples? 

 

Jonny when you claim there is a two tier justice system it is for you to provide the evidence to back your claim.

 

I, and others, have frequently posted facts that disprove claims of two tier justice that you make.

 

I shall continue to do so.

  • Confused 1
Posted

First of all, it's not all that shocking. Rowling has stated repeatedly that she gets death threats because of her trans views. This is just one more. And I imagine that trans people get death threats all the time too.

 

Secondly, all this character has to do is go onto X, where Elon Musk, the "Free Speech Absolutist" and now First Lady, who reinstated Graham Linehan when he threatened to kill a trans activist, will welcome her with open arms. 

 

Thirdly, as heinous as it is, it palls against the 350 murders of trans people already in 2024. Actual violence not just hot air.

 

Like all decent people I'm appalled by this person and agree that some action should be taken. However I'm also appalled by the usual names on here twisting the narrative to suit their own political agenda and anti-LGBT prejudices.

 

It should be condemned for what it is, some idiot spouting bile, and not used for any political narrative or to fuel bigotry. 

 

There are some pretty nasty characters on here too remember, and they're very vocal.

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

First of all, it's not all that shocking. Rowling has stated repeatedly that she gets death threats because of her trans views. This is just one more. And I imagine that trans people get death threats all the time too.

 

Secondly, all this character has to do is go onto X, where Elon Musk, the "Free Speech Absolutist" and now First Lady, who reinstated Graham Linehan when he threatened to kill a trans activist, will welcome her with open arms. 

 

Thirdly, as heinous as it is, it palls against the 350 murders of trans people already in 2024. Actual violence not just hot air.

 

Like all decent people I'm appalled by this person and agree that some action should be taken. However I'm also appalled by the usual names on here twisting the narrative to suit their own political agenda and anti-LGBT prejudices.

 

It should be condemned for what it is, some idiot spouting bile, and not used for any political narrative or to fuel bigotry. 

 

There are some pretty nasty characters on here too remember, and they're very vocal.

 

It's unfortunate that you cannot simply say that this person is wrong, and leave it at that.  The fact that you feel the need to point out how things are much worse for trans people, makes it seem like your condemnation is somewhat insincere.

  • Sad 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

It's unfortunate that you cannot simply say that this person is wrong, and leave it at that.  The fact that you feel the need to point out how things are much worse for trans people, makes it seem like your condemnation is somewhat insincere.

That this person is wrong isn't in question and I say so unreservedly. I think it's rather bizarre that you think I'm insincere in my condemnation when I call this person vile, a nasty character and that it's heinous and appalled I'm by her comments. I'm sorry if I didn't use the right words for you. 

 

And the reason I quoted the trans deaths is to highlight the hypocrisy of some on here.

 

One might counter that you and others haven't just come on here to say it's wrong but have tried to exploit this to attack the left and LGBT+. That would be more accurate.

 

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

That this person is wrong isn't in question and I say so unreservedly. I think it's rather bizarre that you think I'm insincere in my condemnation when I call this person vile, a nasty character and that it's heinous and appalled I'm by her comments. I'm sorry if I didn't use the right words for you. 

 

And the reason I quoted the trans deaths is to highlight the hypocrisy of some on here.

 

One might counter that you and others haven't just come on here to say it's wrong but have tried to exploit this to attack the left and LGBT+. That would be more accurate.

 

And you might want to stop calling people liars. You've been warned about that before and it's not a good look.

 

 

Excellent post.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...