Climate Talks in Turmoil Over Fossil Fuel Debate and Financial Commitments

[Social Media]

 

A fierce dispute has erupted at the COP29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, as negotiators from nearly 200 countries grapple with contentious issues surrounding fossil fuels and financial aid for climate action. Leading nations, including the UK, the European Union, New Zealand, and Ireland, have denounced a draft agreement as a step backward from previous commitments to phase out planet-warming fossil fuels.  

 

"Standing still is retreat, and the world will rightly judge us very harshly if this is the outcome," said UK Energy Minister Ed Miliband. Echoing this sentiment, the EU Commissioner for Climate Action, Wopke Hoekstra, described the proposal as "unbalanced, unworkable, and unsubtle."  

 

Tensions are also high among developing nations, who expressed frustration over the absence of a concrete financial framework to support their climate efforts. They argue that wealthy countries are reneging on promises made in the 2015 Paris Agreement, which pledged financial aid to help poorer nations transition away from fossil fuels and prepare for climate impacts.  

 

"This is not even a joke. This is an offense to the demands of the global south," said Bolivia's lead negotiator, Diego Pacheco. He criticized the lack of clear financial commitments, stating, "This is a finance COP and needs political will to provide finance, and anything less is a betrayal to [...] the Paris Agreement and to millions of people around the world."  

 

The G77+China group, representing developing nations, has called for $1.3 trillion in annual funding by 2030, drawn from both public and private sources. However, no official figure has been presented, and negotiators like Evans Njewa, chair for the Least Developed Countries Group, remain skeptical. "I have heard figures in the corridors, but nothing official," he said, noting concerns about the balance between grants and loans to avoid exacerbating existing debt.  

 

The fossil fuel debate has further polarized the talks. At COP28 in Dubai last year, countries agreed to "transition away from fossil fuels," a landmark decision hailed as a significant step forward. However, current proposals appear to dilute this language. Samoan Minister Cedric Schuster, speaking on behalf of small island nations at the forefront of climate impacts, warned, "We cannot afford to undermine the progress achieved less than a year ago in Dubai."  

 

US Climate Envoy John Podesta also expressed disappointment. "We are surprised that there is nothing that carries forward...what we agreed last year in Dubai," he said, adding that failure to act decisively would let down "the millions of people already feeling the effects of extreme weather."  

 

Diplomatic frustrations have also been directed at COP29’s hosts, Azerbaijan. Critics claim the draft agreement reflects the priorities of oil-rich nations, including Saudi Arabia and the Like-Minded Developing Countries group, which includes China, India, and Bolivia. Ireland’s Environment Minister Eamon Ryan remarked that the current proposal treats the Dubai agreement as optional. "We all know that there has been backsliding...and that has to stop in the interest of the Arab group too," he said.  

 

UN Secretary-General António Guterres has underscored the gravity of the situation, stating, "Failure is not an option." As negotiations continue, the stakes remain high, with world leaders under pressure to bridge the gap between ambition and action, ensuring both robust mitigation measures and financial support for those most vulnerable to the climate crisis.

 

Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-23

 

 

 

[nobodysfriend]

Holding climate change talks in oil and gas producing countries is a mistake .

In Azerbaijan the host took the occasion to make deals with other oil producing countries , instead of finding a way out ...

 

[James105]

5 hours ago, Social Media said:

Tensions are also high among developing nations, who expressed frustration over the absence of a concrete financial framework to support their climate efforts

 

Free money conference at the expense of the western taxpayer.   

[Thingamabob]

39 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

Free money conference at the expense of the western taxpayer.   

Starmer, the UK prime minister, apparently took 479 delegates with him, by air, to this conference. Hard to believe, but that is what is being reported.

[digger70]

 

Climate Talks in Turmoil Over Fossil Fuel Debate and Financial Commitments.

 

9 hours ago, Social Media said:

A fierce dispute has erupted at the COP29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, as negotiators from nearly 200 countries grapple with contentious issues surrounding fossil fuels and financial aid for climate action. Leading nations, including the UK, the European Union, New Zealand, and Ireland, have denounced a draft agreement as a step backward from previous commitments to phase out planet-warming fossil fuels.  

One can't blame  nations for being  Skeptical for this  Trillions of dollar  Scam  to waste their money to the so called poor nations  to waste and  trying to fight  the Phenomenon one can't stop.

 As to phase out (So Called Planet-Warming) fossil fuels that will Never happen.

Everything that has to be made Machines that have to be built  and or fabricated  Needs the input of Fossil Fuel. 

[Stargeezr]

China, Russia, ME and USA among others will not quit using

oil, gas, deisel or even coal, for the sake of the Green people, if

the green energy is going to be so much more espensive to use.

 There is common sense, then there is the woke people in the world.

Electric vehicle fires are very hard to put out, and it seems that

EVs are catching on fire quite often lately, especially after a car accident.

[Patong2021]

I support climate change action.

I do not support a financial shakedown by corrupt nations who refuse to provide a transparent and honest undertaking with what they would do with the money they demand.

China is one of the worst pollution enablers. It constructs coal burning power generation plants, and heavy polluting industry facilities for  profit in these countries and then demands that western countries subsidize the  damage mitigation efforts necessitated by its own activity.

India is another of the world's worst offenders and refuses to undertake even the most basic of water pollution mitigation initiatives.

Russia has been pumping oil in Siberia with the result of some of the most catastrophic oil pipeline and water spill results in the world. its response is to incarcerate or to kill anyone who reports on the environmental catastrophe. 

 

It is time for western nations to grow a backbone and say no to the extortion.