Popular Post mdr224 Posted 2 hours ago Popular Post Posted 2 hours ago The left and their defense of terrorists makes me sick. How are 100% of the west not on the same page. The reason for decline is obvious 3 2 1 1
JonnyF Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: He’s been locked up, he served his sentence. Yes, and now he is out, primed to re-offend. Like I said, let's hope the police can divert resources to monitoring him, instead of scrolling through X looking for hurty words. 2
Popular Post RayC Posted 2 hours ago Popular Post Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, mdr224 said: The left and their defense of terrorists makes me sick. How are 100% of the west not on the same page. The reason for decline is obvious This thread is effectively about what can be done under current UK legislation to prevent this odious individual planning/ carrying out more terrorist activities. I don't see anyone on 'The Left' defending terrorism here. 1 2
JonnyF Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, mdr224 said: The left and their defense of terrorists makes me sick. How are 100% of the west not on the same page. The reason for decline is obvious Sickening isn't it. Some even gloating on this thread that he has served his sentence and is free to go. 1 1 1
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, JonnyF said: f he's is deemed a continued danger to the public as the article states, he should not be released. As disgustingly loathsome as this repugnant creature clearly is, how could his release be denied if he had completed his sentence in full and complied with any associated conditions? Being a potential danger to the public is not an offence. Edited 2 hours ago by Liverpool Lou 1 2
proton Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: He’s been locked up, he served his sentence. Just not long enough, in one of his sharia paradises he would have been executed in public 1 1
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said: The article does not explain what those ‘legal obligations’ are. Releasing him after completing his sentence...obviously.
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, JonnyF said: I think you are on the wrong thread Chomps. This is about the Manchester bomber. No, it is not about the Manchester bomber, it is about the release of Abdalraouf Abdallah, a convicted terrorist jailed for facilitating travel to Syria for individuals seeking to join the Islamic State group. The Manchester Arena bomber is Salman Abedi 1
Bkk Brian Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: No, it is not about the Manchester bomber, it is about the release of Abdalraouf Abdallah, a convicted terrorist jailed for facilitating travel to Syria for individuals seeking to join the Islamic State group. The Manchester Arena bomber is Salman Abedi The Justice Secretary is now under pressure to take urgent action. Jenrick and others have emphasized the gravity of the threat Abdallah poses, particularly given his previous role in radicalizing Abedi, whose attack on the Manchester Arena in 2017 claimed 22 lives and left scores injured.
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 24 minutes ago, mdr224 said: The left and their defense of terrorists makes me sick. How are 100% of the west not on the same page. The reason for decline is obvious The cnut was charged, convicted and sentenced by the "West", a sentence that he served in full. What is your issue with that? 1
Popular Post stevenl Posted 2 hours ago Popular Post Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: The Justice Secretary is now under pressure to take urgent action. Jenrick and others have emphasized the gravity of the threat Abdallah poses, particularly given his previous role in radicalizing Abedi, whose attack on the Manchester Arena in 2017 claimed 22 lives and left scores injured. So charge him if he committed a crime. 1 1 2
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 19 minutes ago, JonnyF said: es, and now he is out, primed to re-offend. So what? That's no different than for every other released criminal, should they also suffer further consequences after completing their sentences or are you just directing your ire at this one bastard? 1 1
mdr224 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said: The cnut was charged, convicted and sentenced by the "West", a sentence that he served in full. What is your issue with that? I dont even believe you have a political affiliation. You just spend your time here fighting the common sense cause 2 2 1
Bkk Brian Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, stevenl said: So charge him if he committed a crime. Are you taking to the justice secretary? Still waiting for you to get back on this?
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 21 minutes ago, JonnyF said: Sickening isn't it. Some even gloating on this thread that he has served his sentence and is free to go. Name one poster who has been "gloating" that he was freed after completing his sentence. If you had served a jail sentence would you be ok with demands for you to be further punished? 1
JonnyF Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: No, it is not about the Manchester bomber, it is about the release of Abdalraouf Abdallah, a convicted terrorist jailed for facilitating travel to Syria for individuals seeking to join the Islamic State group. The Manchester Arena bomber is Salman Abedi It's about someone with links to the Manchester bomber. Are you really here just to pedantically start arguments? 😃 2 3
JonnyF Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: If you had served a jail sentence would you be ok with demands for you to be further punished? No. If I was still radicalized like he is I'm sure I'd be delighted to be let free to continue plotting to kill innocent people. As I'm sure he is delighted. 1 2
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, mdr224 said: 7 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: The cnut was charged, convicted and sentenced by the "West", a sentence that he served in full. What is your issue with that? I dont even believe you have a political affiliation. You just spend your time here fighting the common sense cause I have to have a political affiliation to post here...since when? I post here with rational opinion and observation, so please quote any post of mine that is objectively contrary to "common sense cause" or law. This is a discussion forum, there is no "common sense cause" that has to be supported. 1 1 1
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 13 minutes ago, JonnyF said: 30 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: No, it is not about the Manchester bomber, it is about the release of Abdalraouf Abdallah, a convicted terrorist jailed for facilitating travel to Syria for individuals seeking to join the Islamic State group. The Manchester Arena bomber is Salman Abedi It's about someone with links to the Manchester bomber. I know that but you claimed that the thread "is about the Manchester bomber"...it isn't. Edited 1 hour ago by Liverpool Lou 1
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, JonnyF said: Are you really here just to pedantically start arguments? No, I'm here to inject a modicum of rationality and accuracy. It is those who post false claims that appear to want to start arguments and then want to disagree, irrationally and pedantically, with factual statements! 1 1
Popular Post mdr224 Posted 2 hours ago Popular Post Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: I have to have a political affiliation to post here...since when? I post here with rational opinion and observation, so please quote any post of mine that is objectively contrary to "common sense cause" or law. This is a discussion forum, there is no "common sense cause" that has to be supported. You are morally corrupt, not rational 2 3
Liverpool Lou Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 9 minutes ago, JonnyF said: 15 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: If you had served a jail sentence would you be ok with demands for you to be further punished? No. If I was still radicalized like he is I'm sure I'd be delighted to be let free to continue plotting to kill innocent people. As I'm sure he is delighted. There you go, he has exactly the same rights as you would have, so what's the issue? You want some criminals to be treated better than others after completing their sentences?
Liverpool Lou Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, mdr224 said: You are morally corrupt, not rational Really? An example, please, to justify your irrational accusation. 1
JonnyF Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: No, I'm here to inject a modicum of rationality and accuracy. It is those who post false claims that appear to want to start arguments and then want to disagree, irrationally and pedantically, with factual statements! Calm down calm down. 😆 It is about a guy with links to the Manchester bomber. He is mentioned in the thread title and also in the subsequent story. I did not say it was "solely and exclusively" about the Manchester bomber. 1
Patong2021 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 56 minutes ago, JonnyF said: Sickening isn't it. Some even gloating on this thread that he has served his sentence and is free to go. I don't see anyone gloating. The man is evil and if it was up to me, I would send his 68 IQ bloated body back to Libya. He is in the UK and walking around in large part because of people like Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott and George Galloway. 1
JonnyF Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Patong2021 said: I don't see anyone gloating. I guess you need to know the posters history to understand their thinly disguised smug attitude towards his release. 2 minutes ago, Patong2021 said: The man is evil and if it was up to me, I would send his 68 IQ bloated body back to Libya. He is in the UK and walking around in large part because of people like Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott and George Galloway. Agreed. Despicable characters. Like most Britain hating leftists.
Jim Blue Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago You did not do well at school but completed your education at college until you were 18. Things must have changed since my time in the 60's. Everyone who did not do well at 16 had to .......work !
JonnyF Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Jim Blue said: Everyone who did not do well at 16 had to .......work ! Now they get a pat on the back, a participation trophy and a medical diagnosis consisting of 7 random letters of the alphabet. 😆 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now