1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I worked it out by dividing the number of migrant who volunteered to removed to Rwanda under the Tory Government’s Rwanda scheme by the cost of that scheme.

 

£700,000,000 / 4 = £175,000,000 per person.

 

Did you attend school with Dianne Abbott ?
 

You need to add in the cost of the Lawfare, that Labour was up to its neck in.

 

Labour are responsible for half that £175,000,000 + per person.

2 minutes ago, transam said:

Has Labour now stopped the boats, I mean, they have had years to plan for it, or has the focus been shifted to attack the pensioners and farmers, and soon the bereaved........?

 

I also notice that your leader, who has lied himself into the big chair, has had a change of personality, his true roots are coming to the fore...

 

Something for you to comment on below........🤭

(PS. Don't come back and say it is not your Party).........😂

 

 

Labour are in the process of dealing with the migrant problem, refer positive improvements discussed above.

 

I don’t comment on videos, this is a discussion forum.

 

Just now, The Cyclist said:

 

Did you attend school with Dianne Abbott ?
 

You need to add in the cost of the Lawfare, that Labour was up to its neck in.

 

Labour are responsible for half that £175,000,000 + per person.

I attended a number of academic institutions, all of which pressed home the need to back up claims with credible evidence.

 

So here’s your chance to show us how that’s done:

 

“Labour are responsible for half that £175,000,000 + per person.”

 

Let’s see you back that claim up with a credible link.

 

 

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Labour are in the process of dealing with the migrant problem, refer positive improvements discussed above.

 

Hi Dianne

 

No surprise that you think less than 700 gone and 20,000 arrived is a postive improvement.

 

 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

I attended a number of academic institutions

 

Ask for money back, you woz robbed

 

Just now, The Cyclist said:

 

Hi Dianne

 

No surprise that you think less than 700 gone and 20,000 arrived is a postive improvement.

 

 

 

25 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

it’s vastly cheaper than the £175,000,000 per person the Tories spent

175 Million PER PERSON?

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Labour did not oppose deportations, they opposed the immensely costly, ineffective and illegal Rwanda scheme.

 

Labour getting g the job done without recourse to performative cruelty, stoking racism or stuffing wads of cash into the chums of Government ministers.

Glad to see at least one member hear recognizing the positive achievements of this Labour Government.

 

 

 

 

 

   As I recall there were protests from other airplane flight passengers when people were being deported under the Tories .

   Other passengers stopped the deportations by causing a fuss on the flight .

  The solution to that is to get secret  private flights and mass deportations .

   Throwing them out the Country without telling anyone is the solution to the problem of passengers complaining about deportations .

   I am getting to like this Starmer guy .

 

5 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

175 Million PER PERSON?

Refer calculation and link above.

15 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Hi Dianne

 

No surprise that you think less than 700 gone and 20,000 arrived is a postive improvement.

 

 

Forgive me for calling out your nonsense claim that:

 

“Labour are responsible for half that £175,000,000 + per person.”

 

I do understand why, in the face of an inability to back up your claims you resort to personal attacks.

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Throwing them out the Country without telling anyone is the solution to the problem of passengers complaining about deportations .

   I am getting to like this Starmer guy .

 

Voluntary repatriations witha £3000 bung.

 

No-one was thrown out.

Just now, The Cyclist said:

 

Voluntary repatriations witha £3000 bung.

 

No-one was thrown out.

You feel aggrieved because you missed out on the ‘throwing’?

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Refer calculation and link above.

Please explain. That figure is totally incorrect/impossible.

1 minute ago, KannikaP said:

Please explain. That figure is totally incorrect/impossible.

Refer this link and calculations in earlier post:

 

6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The tip of the iceberg that was Tory incompetence and corruption.

Hundreds of £millions of tax payer’s money pished away, and/or handed to chums.

 

Meanwhile Labour successfully deporting hundreds of people who have no right to be in the UK:

 

https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/prime-minister-rwanda-government-home-office-labour-b2606947.html

 

 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

I do understand why, in the face of an inability to back up your claims you resort to personal attacks.

 

Dont flatter yourself.

 

I am waiting on the benefit of your Academia, to explain, how 649 repatriations against 20,000 arrivals, since July,  is a step in a positive direction.

 

It shouldn't be a hard task for someone who likes to boast about the Institutions they have attended.

 

Whilst you are blinding us with science, could you also regale us with how many Hotels Labour have requisitioned for illegals since July and at what cost ?

 

 

2 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Voluntary repatriations witha £3000 bung.

 

No-one was thrown out.

 

  About 75 % left voluntarily , 25 % were forced to go . 

Imagine that : Getting a dingy over to the UK , getting free food and lodging in a 4 star hotel for a few years and then getting a free flight to Brazil with 3 G in your sky rocket .

4 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  About 75 % left voluntarily , 25 % were forced to go . 

Imagine that : Getting a dingy over to the UK , getting free food and lodging in a 4 star hotel for a few years and then getting a free flight to Brazil with 3 G in your sky rocket .

 

It appears that the majority were expired visas, so no dinghies or 4 start hotels.

 

There is a precedent with Brazilians, his name was Jean Chalres de Menezes, overstaying his visa didn'tnwork out too well for him.

It was a cynical, immoral and illegal scheme anyway and it's good it bit the dust.

2 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

It appears that the majority were expired visas, so no dinghies or 4 start hotels.

 

There is a precedent with Brazilians, his name was Jean Chalres de Menezes, overstaying his visa didn'tnwork out too well for him.

 

   Brazil is just one of the locations where they were deported to , there are numerous other countries where they have been sent to 

12 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Dont flatter yourself.

 

I am waiting on the benefit of your Academia, to explain, how 649 repatriations against 20,000 arrivals, since July,  is a step in a positive direction.

 

It shouldn't be a hard task for someone who likes to boast about the Institutions they have attended.

 

Whilst you are blinding us with science, could you also regale us with how many Hotels Labour have requisitioned for illegals since July and at what cost ?

 

 

Who said it was?

11 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  About 75 % left voluntarily , 25 % were forced to go . 

Imagine that : Getting a dingy over to the UK , getting free food and lodging in a 4 star hotel for a few years and then getting a free flight to Brazil with 3 G in your sky rocket .

I’m sure you imagine a lot of things.

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Who said it was?

 

You did, right here

 

47 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Labour are in the process of dealing with the migrant problem, refer positive improvements discussed above.

 

I will ask you again, in what weird world of academia is 649 repatriations against 20,000 illegal arrivals a positive improvement ?
 

A net increase of some 19, 341 is neither dealing with the problem or making positive improvements.

 

And only an utter lunatic would try to spin it as a positive.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I worked it out by dividing the number of migrant who volunteered to removed to Rwanda under the Tory Government’s Rwanda scheme by the cost of that scheme.

 

£700,000,000 / 4 = £175,000,000 per person.

 

Refer links I provided above.

 

Your links?

A tad misleading dividing the whole costs and then dividing by 4!

A total of £715 million was spent on the Rwanda deportation scheme, a cost breakdown of the plan has shown.

Among the costs outlined are £290 million paid to Rwanda’s government, £50 million on flights, escorting, airfield preparations and police force costs, and £95 million on detention and reception centres over a period between 2022 and June 2024.

Other spending, including on setting up new IT systems, legal costs, and staffing, added up to £280 million.

£715 million spent on scrapped Rwanda deportation scheme, breakdown reveals

2 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

A tad misleading dividing the whole costs and then dividing by 4!

A total of £715 million was spent on the Rwanda deportation scheme, a cost breakdown of the plan has shown.

Among the costs outlined are £290 million paid to Rwanda’s government, £50 million on flights, escorting, airfield preparations and police force costs, and £95 million on detention and reception centres over a period between 2022 and June 2024.

Other spending, including on setting up new IT systems, legal costs, and staffing, added up to £280 million.

£715 million spent on scrapped Rwanda deportation scheme, breakdown reveals

And 4 deportations achieved at that combined cost.

 

But yes, more than £700,000,000 a whole £15,000,000 more.

 

 

Edited December 4, 20241 yr by Chomper Higgot

1 hour ago, The Cyclist said:

 

There is a precedent with Brazilians, his name was Jean Chalres de Menezes, overstaying his visa didn'tnwork out too well for him.

 

   Why would you mention Charles De Menezes ?

He was the Brazilian man who got shot dead by UK Police after they mistook him for an Arab terrorist .

   Why did you mention him ?

 

4 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Why would you mention Charles De Menezes ?

 

A rather obvious precedent of Brazilians overstaying their Visa's to remain in the UK.

 

Not limited to Brazilians, of course. It is rampant in the UK.

 

Along with false marriage visas, false education visas, false employment visas. Been going on for decades, and the 2 main Political Parties share the blame for not getting to grips with it.

50 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

A tad misleading dividing the whole costs and then dividing by 4!

A total of £715 million was spent on the Rwanda deportation scheme, a cost breakdown of the plan has shown.

Among the costs outlined are £290 million paid to Rwanda’s government, £50 million on flights, escorting, airfield preparations and police force costs, and £95 million on detention and reception centres over a period between 2022 and June 2024.

Other spending, including on setting up new IT systems, legal costs, and staffing, added up to £280 million.

£715 million spent on scrapped Rwanda deportation scheme, breakdown reveals

4 being the number of ‘migrants’ deported by the £715,000,000 scheme to deport migrants.

9 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Why would you mention Charles De Menezes ?

He was the Brazilian man who got shot dead by UK Police after they mistook him for an Arab terrorist .

   Why did you mention him ?

 

Just to be offensive would be my guess.

1 minute ago, The Cyclist said:

 

A rather obvious precedent of Brazilians overstaying their Visa's to remain in the UK.

 

Not limited to Brazilians, of course. It is rampant in the UK.

 

Along with false marriage visas, false education visas, false employment visas. Been going on for decades, and the 2 main Political Parties share the blame for not getting to grips with it.

 

   Its not a precedent at all, as it was a one off mistake .

There have been clampdowns of  fasle education visas and marriage visas and its been made difficult for illegal people to remain in the U.K.

  

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Labour are in the process of dealing with the migrant problem, refer positive improvements discussed above.

 

I don’t comment on videos, this is a discussion forum.

 

Of course, you don't, and of course Labour are dealing with it.........😂

 

3,000,000 signatures say different, chap...............🤔

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Just to be offensive would be my guess.

 

You thought wrong

 

5 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

A rather obvious precedent of Brazilians overstaying their Visa's to remain in the UK.

 

Not limited to Brazilians, of course. It is rampant in the UK.

 

Along with false marriage visas, false education visas, false employment visas. Been going on for decades, and the 2 main Political Parties share the blame for not getting to grips with it.

 

You would probably think it was offensive, if I said, if he had not overstayed his visa, he would not have been on the train and would not have been shot in the head.

 

A fact, probably not a nice fact, but a fact nonetheless.