hotandsticky Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Mr Meeseeks said: He, his family and his friends are above the law. It would appear that they ARE the law !! 1 1
BarBoy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tropicalevo said: Thaksin is flavour of the month. He's like marmite to me. I hate marmite. 1
hotchilli Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, webfact said: This was announced by former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra during a Pheu Thai Party meeting, which took place on a journey to Hua Hin in Prachuap Khiri Khan. The seminar aimed to bolster the party's strategies and enhance leadership effectiveness Stay out of politics he was told? What more proof does the judiciary need? 1
wealthychef Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, webfact said: who will work alongside police and provincial entities to intensify drug suppression. This vague language is hard to understand. Are they trying to arrest speed freaks? Biker gangs? Crack down on weed shops? Mushroom pizza? I don't really understand what this is all supposed to be about. But I understand TIT!
watchcat Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, BarBoy said: I wish these bleedin' shins would give it a rest with all this populist crap. same old record that's been playing for years. not a single thai I know gives a flying frig about the so called 'drug problem'. It just doesn't affect them. As long as they're almost free.
watchcat Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 18 minutes ago, hotchilli said: What more proof does the judiciary need? They shouldn't Look in their briefscases for brown envelopes. 1 1
Burma Bill Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, webfact said: to combat Thailand's continuing drug challenges, 4 hours ago, webfact said: This was announced by former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra Back to extrajudicial killings in the border areas of Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai Provinces with Burma? Ya ba "mules' beware! Personally, I support such action. No further comment from me.
findlay13 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago But he's not involved with politics anymore.He said so.
watchcat Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, findlay13 said: But he's not involved with politics anymore.He said so. It's gotta be truth then
kiwikeith Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Briggsy said: Roll out the Border Police again to eliminate anybody who is deemed to be involved in drugs. No accountability, no justice. Just extrajudicial executions decided by those who currently hold power. It will be a drug war between police and and Army mules
watchcat Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, Tropicalevo said: You're gonna need more prisons boss. No problems, we'll take it from the taxes, not from the filthy rich of course
watchcat Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, redwood1 said: How Tony can even have the nerve to be apart of this after the 100s of criminal judicial killings he ordered when he was PM is incomprehensible.....He should have spent time in jail over what happened... Just look at that big stupid grin in the photo......... Folks he is laughing because he knows he above the law..... I think not, remember when he fled the country for 17 years (his former wife still at large)
Zack61 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, Bagwain said: I thought he had a court order to stay out of politics? Just coaching from the sidelines. NOT 1
Artisi Posted 59 minutes ago Posted 59 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Deerculler said: Is Thaskin the Prime Minister or his daughter? What would you think? 😉 1
Davedub Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago Oh, the insanity of those that would repeat the same action over and over, each time expecting a different result. Drugs won the war on drugs, decades ago. Here I go again, banging the same old drum; education and mental health care have been proven to be the best measures to undertake in reducing drug harm. The Portugese experiment of many, many years now stands as proof of this. No well informed, mentally healthy person will knowingly cause themselves harm, period. Those that inflict drug harm on themselves do so either through ignorance or are driven to numb the pain of well defined, mostly treatable mental health issues. But no, those that base their policy making on twisted psudeo-moralistic values and a desire to appear 'tough' instead of using reason, logic and science are in charge. They will cause yet more harm by criminalising otherwise law abiding drug users and punish instead of offering help to drug abusers / addicts. Families will be broken up. Vast sums of money will continue to be funneled into the hands of powerful criminal enterprieses. A climate that encourages extra-judicial penalties and even killings will be engendered. Drug harm and addiction rates will continue to rise as they always do, regardless of how many 'assertive drug policies' have been put in place. Perhaps a better approach would be to investigate the reasons why mental health issues are increasiing year on year? I strongly suspect this would yield far greater results in the 'fight' against drug harm and addiction. 1
watchcat Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 36 minutes ago, kiwikeith said: It will be a drug war between police and and Army mules Let them fight it out then.
TheFishman1 Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago I thought one of the stipulations was he wasn’t supposed to be getting involved in politics well he’s announcing the policy I think that he is complete control of the party in TIT
Jonathan Swift Posted 7 minutes ago Posted 7 minutes ago 3 hours ago, mikeymike100 said: Yes, have you noticed he tends to ignore those? I think it was a court suggestion
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now