Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
40 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

You don't understand any science.. you fill your head with someone else's opinion of science

 

IMG_2165.jpeg

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

So sad… and there are many such examples.

And I’ll bet that there are parents out there still getting their children boosted.

  • Agree 1
Posted

A quick question to the MRNA vaxxers. 

 

The vax wanes after 2 to 3 months. Throughout covid, if you didn't get a booster every 3 months, doesn't that make you an anti vaxxer? 

 

I mean, you were / are the same as an anti vaxxer, not protected. Covid is still out there.  There could be an even nastier strain out there now, it just doesn't make the news anymore, and you haven't had a booster in years.  

 

Are you now an anti vaxxer?  :smile:   

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

A quick question to the MRNA vaxxers. 

 

The vax wanes after 2 to 3 months. Throughout covid, if you didn't get a booster every 3 months, doesn't that make you an anti vaxxer? 

 

I mean, you were / are the same as an anti vaxxer, not protected. Covid is still out there.  There could be an even nastier strain out there now, it just doesn't make the news anymore, and you haven't had a booster in years.  

 

Are you now an anti vaxxer?  :smile:   

I have wondered the same thing.  
 

I have had people say to me  

 

“you can’t deny that the vaccine saved lives!”

 

Then, when I ask if they have been boosted….

 

crickets

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Airalee said:

I have wondered the same thing.  
 

I have had people say to me  

 

“you can’t deny that the vaccine saved lives!”

 

Then, when I ask if they have been boosted….

 

crickets

Yes, they took an MRNA vax because they were like sheep and followed the crowd. 

 

Then, when some negative side effects started to make the news, they said no more MRNA for me, but it was too late, it's already inside them, so they have to defend their decision as a matter of pride, and of course, they had safety in numbers.  

 

I watched conflict on the news.  I wish I was the anti vaxxer being accused while the camera was filming.  I would have said to my accusers in a gentle voice, "You are dying.  You just don't know it.  Please let me help you."  :cheesy: 

  • Sad 2
Posted
7 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

So, you are unprotected for 9 months of the year.  What's the point of the one shot then? 

I believe in measurement. If you don't measure it, you can't control it.

 

Every three months, I have blood tests, which include a test for COVID antibodies.

 

I still have COVID antibodies in my system after 12 months. Not a lot, but they are there.

 

I don't know about others, but your assertion is false in my case.

Posted
6 hours ago, Airalee said:

I have wondered the same thing.  
 

I have had people say to me  

 

“you can’t deny that the vaccine saved lives!”

 

Then, when I ask if they have been boosted….

 

crickets

No, you misunderstand the effect of vaccination. The antibodies may decrease but t cells continue to afford protection. Most people are probably fine with the original two shots and maybe one booster. Additional boosters are basically only needed for those with immune deficiencies.

  • Agree 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, jaywalker2 said:

No, you misunderstand the effect of vaccination. The antibodies may decrease but t cells continue to afford protection. Most people are probably fine with the original two shots and maybe one booster. Additional boosters are basically only needed for those with immune deficiencies.

Why do the vaccinated keep getting sick over and over?  They seem to have all these unrelated health issues.

 

Maybe if they did something and changed their hedonistic lifestyles then there wouldn’t have been a need to be vaccinated in the first place.

  • Confused 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

So you CBA reading this bit....???

 

5. Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) / Approval

• After Phase 3 trials, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna submitted data to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory bodies (e.g., the European Medicines Agency or EMA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

• Regulatory agencies conducted a thorough review of all data, including:

• Efficacy data showing that the vaccine effectively prevented severe COVID-19 illness.

• Safety data showing that the vaccines had a favorable risk-benefit profile.

• After the review, both vaccines were granted EUA by the FDA in December 2020, allowing them to be administered to the public while ongoing monitoring continued.

Yes, a thorougly biased and often flagrantly manipulated review to ensure the shots would be approved.  The only beneficiary of pushing that harmful, ineffective and totally unnecessary solution being the balance sheets of the vaccine-manufacturers.   

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 1/11/2025 at 6:27 PM, Lacessit said:

Think of the improvement in average IQ that would result.

 

Yep, may move you off the bottom.

Posted
1 hour ago, jaywalker2 said:

No, you misunderstand the effect of vaccination. The antibodies may decrease but t cells continue to afford protection. Most people are probably fine with the original two shots and maybe one booster. Additional boosters are basically only needed for those with immune deficiencies.

You wrote "Most people are probably fine with the original two shots and maybe one booster. Additional boosters are basically only needed for those with immune deficiencies."

Are you an anti-vaxxer?  Because that's NOT the recommendation of the CDC. 

On their website > https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html

you will find:

Recommendations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines

Groups recommended for vaccination

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older in the United States for the prevention of COVID-19.

Posted
10 hours ago, Lacessit said:

My apologies, I mistook you for someone who wanted to learn.

 

If facts and data upset you, I have much more.

Yes, but I'll have to find someone else if I'm looking for what you post is purely fiction

 

I have a distinct feeling you are paid me on this form as well as possibly others to post this nonsense

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

You wrote "Most people are probably fine with the original two shots and maybe one booster. Additional boosters are basically only needed for those with immune deficiencies."

Are you an anti-vaxxer?  Because that's NOT the recommendation of the CDC. 

On their website > https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html

you will find:

Recommendations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines

Groups recommended for vaccination

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older in the United States for the prevention of COVID-19.

Who cares what the recommendation of the CDC is. The reputation is an absolute shambles.. Fauci very well might find himself in jail if Justice were to actually prevail

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

Yes, they took an MRNA vax because they were like sheep and followed the crowd. 

 

Then, when some negative side effects started to make the news, they said no more MRNA for me, but it was too late, it's already inside them, so they have to defend their decision as a matter of pride, and of course, they had safety in numbers.  

 

I watched conflict on the news.  I wish I was the anti vaxxer being accused while the camera was filming.  I would have said to my accusers in a gentle voice, "You are dying.  You just don't know it.  Please let me help you."  :cheesy: 

 

 

The mRNA itself degrades quickly after being used by the body, and it never integrates into a person’s DNA or replicates like a live virus would so shedding is impossible.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

You wrote "Most people are probably fine with the original two shots and maybe one booster. Additional boosters are basically only needed for those with immune deficiencies."

Are you an anti-vaxxer?  Because that's NOT the recommendation of the CDC. 

On their website > https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html

you will find:

Recommendations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines

Groups recommended for vaccination

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older in the United States for the prevention of COVID-19.

The CDC always errs on the side of caution. They would rather everyone have the same message rather than risk misinterpretations. Paul Offit discusses this. He was on the advisory committee when the bivalent vaccine was introduced and he was against recommending it because the data showed it didn't offer much more protection than the Omicron booster and so was unnecessary. The CDC went ahead and recommended it anyway, presumably because they didn't want people to start thinking boosters weren't necessary anymore.

 

It's the same with vaccinating children. Children generally don't get seriously ill or die so it can certainly be argued they don't need the vaccine. But a couple of thousand children have died from Covid and thousands more have been hospitalized. So the CDC figures why risk your child's life, no matter how small the odds. You can agree or disagree with that depending on your point of view.

 

But there has been ample evidence that people who got the original two shots and, perhaps, a booster, are sufficiently protected against serious illness assuming they are in good health and don't have any immune problems.

 

I had two Astra Zeneca shots and that was it. But I never get ill so I wasn't worried. I did catch something last year that might have been Covid, though the PCR test was negative. It was mild and lasted about five days. I didn't even have to stay in bed.

Posted
1 hour ago, Airalee said:

Why do the vaccinated keep getting sick over and over?  They seem to have all these unrelated health issues.

 

Maybe if they did something and changed their hedonistic lifestyles then there wouldn’t have been a need to be vaccinated in the first place.

Well, they don't. Vulnerable people get sick over and over perhaps but unvaccinated people probably get Covid at higher rates. I say probably because they're less likely to test themselves or seek medical care for milder cases, so it's hard to know the statistics for sure.

Posted
12 minutes ago, jaywalker2 said:

It's the same with vaccinating children. Children generally don't get seriously ill or die so it can certainly be argued they don't need the vaccine. But a couple of thousand children have died from Covid and thousands more have been hospitalized. So the CDC figures why risk your child's life, no matter how small the odds. You can agree or disagree with that depending on your point of view.

This is monumental hogwash.

 

No children have died from the covid-19. 

 

The CDC is full of compromised idiots who are now looking over their shoulders for RFK jr to stomp through their door.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

The mRNA itself degrades quickly after being used by the body, and it never integrates into a person’s DNA or replicates like a live virus would so shedding is impossible.

Good point.

Recall that the vaccine had to be temperature controlled (kept cold) to avoid disintegration of the mRNA at room temperature.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, cdemundo said:

Good point.

Recall that the vaccine had to be temperature controlled (kept cold) to avoid disintegration of the mRNA at room temperature.

 

I remember being worried about that being handled correctly over here.....but I was too slow to get any....555...ended up having mine back in the UK.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

This is monumental hogwash.

 

No children have died from the covid-19. 

 

The CDC is full of compromised idiots who are now looking over their shoulders for RFK jr to stomp through their door.

image.thumb.png.a31ef64442c10c5ae7a54a7a6a0d9ec3.png

 

How many children have died from COVID-19?

Among the 4.4 million COVID-19 deaths1 reported in the MPIDR COVerAGE database, 0.4 per cent (over 17,400) occurred in children and adolescents under 20 years of age. Of the over 17,400 deaths reported in those under 20 years of age, 53 per cent occurred among adolescents ages 10–19, and 47 per cent among children ages 0–9.

Data correct as of December 2023. For more information, including age and sex disaggregated data,

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, cdemundo said:
30 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

The mRNA itself degrades quickly after being used by the body, and it never integrates into a person’s DNA or replicates like a live virus would so shedding is impossible.

Good point.

Recall that the vaccine had to be temperature controlled (kept cold) to avoid disintegration of the mRNA at room temperature.

 

How many times have they moved that goalpost?  Remember when the science said "it won't move beyond the injection site"?  Then it was, "well, it moves beyond the injection site, but not into the organs" (or some other such nonsense).  And every month or so, they had to move that goalpost again.  And again.  And again.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

The mRNA itself degrades quickly after being used by the body, and it never integrates into a person’s DNA or replicates like a live virus would so shedding is impossible.

Wow, 3 lies in 1 sentence, that must be a record!

The mRNA itself degrades quickly after being used by the body (#1), and it never integrates into a person’s DNA (#2) or replicates like a live virus would so shedding is impossible (#3).

 

 

Post has been edited to remove colored fonts.

Posted
2 minutes ago, jaywalker2 said:

image.thumb.png.a31ef64442c10c5ae7a54a7a6a0d9ec3.png

 

How many children have died from COVID-19?

Among the 4.4 million COVID-19 deaths1 reported in the MPIDR COVerAGE database, 0.4 per cent (over 17,400) occurred in children and adolescents under 20 years of age. Of the over 17,400 deaths reported in those under 20 years of age, 53 per cent occurred among adolescents ages 10–19, and 47 per cent among children ages 0–9.

Data correct as of December 2023. For more information, including age and sex disaggregated data,

 

Well they are wrong.

They simply do not know what they are talking about.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...