Social Media Posted January 15 Posted January 15 In post-2003 Iraq, there have been numerous attempts by Islamist factions to alter family laws to increase religious authorities' influence. These efforts have largely failed, but this time, the situation seems more precarious. “This is the closest we've come to actually seeing this through, and if this happens it's probably going to be one of the most impactful events in Iraq's post-2003 history, with huge repercussions going forward,” Alshamary tells TIME. The proposed amendment seeks to modify the 1959 Personal Status Law, allowing Muslim families the option to marry under civil or religious law. Presently, all marriages and divorces must be processed through secular civil courts to be recognized by the government. If the amendment passes, Muslim families would have the option to marry under either the Sunni or Shi’ite legal systems. The amendment raises significant concerns, particularly regarding the potential for legalizing child marriage. The Ja’fari school of Shi’ite Islam, interpreted by some clerics, permits marriage for girls as young as nine. While not all Shi’ite clerics support this interpretation, the possibility has alarmed activists. Given that Shi’ite Muslims constitute about 55-60% of Iraq’s population, according to the U.S. Department of State, the amendment could impact a substantial portion of the population. Child marriage is already a pervasive issue in Iraq, with a 2023 UNICEF report indicating that approximately 28% of girls marry before 18. The amendment could exacerbate the problem. “Just the possibility of [legalizing child marriage] is alarming enough because we already see significant underage marriage in Iraq,” Alshamary warns. Experts also caution that the amendment risks deepening sectarian divisions in a country still reeling from the fractures intensified by the 2003 invasion. “This proposal takes away [power] from the state and gives it to the religious establishment,” says Nida Alahmad, a lecturer at the University of Edinburgh. She fears that establishing separate legal systems for Sunni and Shi’ite Muslims could further entrench sectarian divides. “[It] makes the state fragmented and further institutionalized along sectarian groups.” The next steps for the amendment involve a parliamentary debate before it can be scheduled for a vote. A simple majority in parliament would suffice to pass the amendment into law. As of now, an official debate has not been scheduled. Based on a report by Time 2024-01-16
scubascuba3 Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Didn't Mohammad marry a 6yo and consummate the marriage at 9yo? and Islam extremists follow Mohammed so it makes sense to them to marry at 9 2
Justanotherone Posted January 16 Posted January 16 3 hours ago, Will B Good said: God I hate religions. is china not religion free, well except the north west, with it's MUSLIM PROBLEM 1
RT555 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Lived and worked in M. E..... Biggest HIPPOCRATES.. I the world.. Drinking, smoking, taking prostitutes... Can't trust them.
mrwebb8825 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 I couldn't care less if they marry the sheep. Not my country. Not my religion. You either believe in freedom of religion or you don't. Causes no national security threat so... 🤠
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now