Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, sharot724 said:

Ukraine can not last a never ending war but Vlad's Russia might.


That is the exact reason why Trump is in a hurry while Vlad is successfully stalling time. Z guys love it!

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, zmisha said:


That is the exact reason why Trump is in a hurry while Vlad is successfully stalling time. Z guys love it!

Yes more time to murder Ukrainian civilians, steal and brainwash Ukrainian children, rape, steal, and level Ukrainian cities. Lovely people these Zs.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Yes more time to murder Ukrainian civilians, steal and brainwash Ukrainian children, rape, steal, and level Ukrainian cities. Lovely people these Zs.

Well, Vladimir has said recently that Russians are going to the SMO voluntarily, and Kyiv is catching people "like dogs" on the streets.  If we believe Putin, it turns out that the Z heroes free Ukrainians from the obligation to go to war.

Should we believe Vladimir? Vladimir answered this question himself - "You can't trust anyone, only me." So everything is simple and clear for the Z guys.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

lost best man in the team today..

 

RIP my good friend and great fighter.. DOKTOR

 

we will send you to your family in colombia.. you will be home now.. all gone

 

he was in ukraine from the very first day

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Love It 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Yes more time to murder Ukrainian civilians, steal and brainwash Ukrainian children, rape, steal, and level Ukrainian cities. Lovely people these Zs.

Events in wars are very dramatic - people die. However, ordinary people should always remember that politicians' moods change faster than thai bar girls` mood. And a country that was an enemy yesterday can become a best friend tomorrow. For example, the USA and Great Britain helped Russia a lot in World War II. 

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
2 hours ago, zmisha said:

Events in wars are very dramatic - people die. However, ordinary people should always remember that politicians' moods change faster than thai bar girls` mood. And a country that was an enemy yesterday can become a best friend tomorrow. For example, the USA and Great Britain helped Russia a lot in World War II. 

Putin deliberately targets civilians.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
11 hours ago, MicroB said:

And now we know you have to pay for it, which might be worse than the Incel we thought you were.

You are Ukrainian, right? If so, I think it's the other way around. YOU have to pay for it. Let me explain - for what exactly you have to pay.

Open a world map and point to the borders of some independent country. This country has definitely given half the lives of its citizens in wars to defend its borders. Point to any other country - it's the same. Understand, there is no other way. 
If you bought a beer in a supermarket for 5 dollars, then you will have to pay 5 dollars no matter which way you leave the supermarket and no matter how you twist and turn on the way to the exit. Likewise, if you bought not beer in a supermarket but such a thing as an independent country - this product also has a standard price that everyone pays - you have to give up half the lives of your citizens in wars. Don't like the price? Put the product back on the shelf. Vladimir is waiting - welcome back to the USSR.

  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
15 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Putin deliberately targets civilians.

According to UN, civilian deaths are 10 times smaller than militant deaths. This clearly shows that the primary target of the Russian army is the Ukrainian army, not civilians, keeping in mind that army personnel are usually more protected and better prepared.

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
5 hours ago, VBer said:

According to UN, civilian deaths are 10 times smaller than militant deaths. This clearly shows that the primary target of the Russian army is the Ukrainian army, not civilians, keeping in mind that army personnel are usually more protected and better prepared.

 

No, it means the battlefield, which was previously made up of towns and villages, with people going about their business, has been rendered a wasteland. Mostly military casualties, because the population has mostly fled from the genocide. But Russians continue to seek out and target civilians.

 

In WW1, there were about 400,000 civilian deaths on the Western Front, compared to 3-4 million military deaths. I don't think you can characterise combat in the Great War as being "precision".

 

There have been numerous incidence of Russian forces deliberately targeting civilians, eg the FPV drone attack on the minibus. The Drone operator would have looked into the eyes of the babushkas and dedushkas  as his chose his spot to strike. He clearly targeted the compartment with passengers, as the motor part of the bus is completely intact.

 

image.jpeg.f64f42159aea95c0356c10da3520aaa1.jpeg

 

The Financial Times carried out an investigation that indicated Russia used drones in 2024 to deliberately target civilians in Kherson, both to force them to flee from their homes, but also as literal target practice, proving once more that Russian is carrying out genocide, and, in German terms, little more regards Ukrainians as "untermenschen", an attitude shared by several correspondants on this forum who are openly supporting of Putin's War of Agression and rape.

 

https://www.ft.com/content/31b630b3-2639-456c-ba50-3caea7a9b2b5

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, MicroB said:

The Financial Times carried out an investigation that indicated Russia used drones in 2024 to deliberately target civilians in Kherson

Is it the same Financial Times that posted obvious lie “This T-34, the legendary Soviet tank from World War II, was the only Russian tank on display at the Victory Day”?

  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, VBer said:

Is it the same Financial Times that posted obvious lie “This T-34, the legendary Soviet tank from World War II, was the only Russian tank on display at the Victory Day”?

 

You muppet. Did you go and look at the 2024 parade, which the FT (and others) reported on. Or were you furiously googling to defend your Rapey Hero, you forget to check the dates.

 

One tank on display:

 

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/putins-one-tank-victory-parade-is-a-timely-reminder-russia-can-be-beaten/

 

1 tank on display

 

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-victory-day-parade-moscow-tank-t-34-1898740

 

1 tank

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/09/putin-watches-victory-parade-with-just-one-russian-tank/

 

 

 

The Kremlin's own report, 1 tank

 

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73995

 

Thanks for outing yourself.

Posted
2 hours ago, MicroB said:

Did you go and look at the 2024 parade, which the FT (and others) reported on.

So, this message

 

Appeared  on 10 May, on the next day after parade, it was about 2024 parade.  Author just waited one year to report it. Very obvious, yeah 😀

Posted
5 hours ago, VBer said:

So, this message

 

Appeared  on 10 May, on the next day after parade, it was about 2024 parade.  Author just waited one year to report it. Very obvious, yeah 😀

 

 

The sound of furious back pedaling by Zeliboba (Зелибоба). You slag off the Financial Times based on an anonymous forum posting that breaks forum rules.  Gullible isn't in the dictionary/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...