British husband of the Thai ‘Lady of the Hills’ bailed - video

[rocketboy2]

7 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

 

Do you know how to read? The CPS information quoted is perfectly clear - being released on bail does not mean there is no evidence against a person.

 

Also, as @Briggsy pointed out, if the police have no evidence against someone, they are "released with no further action" (NFA) - they are not released on bail. 

 

As the article below from a UK legal firm states:

 

 

https://mjrsolicitors.co.uk/services/defence-and-criminal-law/no-further-action/

 

By contrast, if you are released on bail, it means, "the police will continue investigating your case and assessing any evidence that has been collected."

 

https://www.jdspicer.co.uk/site/blog/crime-fraud/what-happens-when-bail-ends

 

 

His still walking the streets of the uk

and has not been charged.

End of for now.

 

[Moonlover]

On 2/6/2025 at 5:10 AM, rocketboy2 said:

 

Out on bail.

So they have nothing on him then.

 

No it does not necessarily mean that. He's out on 'conditional bail'. That usually indicates that they do not have sufficient evidence, as yet, to lay charges. But they'll keep digging.

 

The police in the UK can only hold a suspect in custody for 24 hours. After that they will either be released without charge, or released on  'conditional bail' as in this case.

[rocketboy2]

13 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

No it does not necessarily mean that. He's out on 'conditional bail'. That usually indicates that they do not have sufficient evidence, as yet, to lay charges. But they'll keep digging.

 

The police in the UK can only hold a suspect in custody for 24 hours. After that they will either be released without charge, or released on  'conditional bail' as in this case.

 

The cops are just fishing.

Think bail can be extended up to 1 year.

Reckon they have his passport as a bail condition.

Don't reckon they have anything hard on him, they are just waiting for him to trip himself up in any interview.

Maybe they will make a move to exhume the body for more tests as the next move.

 

His is innocent until proven guilty.

 

Also we are talking about the uk police force here, they couldn't find a happy meal in a Mc Donald's.

But are a dab hand at  face book crimes, by old ladies. 

 

 

 

 

[Moonlover]

1 hour ago, rocketboy2 said:

His is innocent until proven guilty.

 

Of course he is. That's a given in the UK justice system.

 

1 hour ago, rocketboy2 said:

Also we are talking about the uk police force here, they couldn't find a happy meal in a Mc Donald's.

But are a dab hand at  face book crimes, by old ladies. 

That's rubbish. The British police are extremely good at investigating cases like this and advancements in forensics have boosted their ability to do so.

 

If he's guilty, they'll find a way proving it.

[Moonlover]

On 2/6/2025 at 4:27 AM, Homburg said:

Guilty by accusation?  What if this guy is innocent?  His life has already been destroyed without a trial. 

So what are you suggesting? (or implying) That the police drop the investigation against their only 'person of interest' on the off chance that he is not responsible, just to preserve his reputation?

 

An unlikely scenario indeed.