Just now, coolcarer said:

Now quote me where I was misrepresenting. logic dictates the budget is given on the number of mosques that need it. If here is an increase the next budget will no doubt reflect that.

 

Why do you also keep ignoring that this is by far not the only source of public funding they get?

I’m not sure who the money is given to, I would expect it’s allocated to the police and, thanks to the link you provided, we know it is a budget allocation to provide security for two communities that have suffered hate crimes.

 

Where is the evidence this other public funding?

 

Referring to the link you provided, do you agree the Government has a duty to provide security for the two named communities that have been subjected to targeted hate crimes?

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not sure who the money is given to, I would expect it’s allocated to the police and, thanks to the link you provided, we know it is a budget allocation to provide security for two communities that have suffered hate crimes.

 

Where is the evidence this other public funding?

 

Referring to the link you provided, do you agree the Government has a duty to provide security for the two named communities that have been subjected to targeted hate crimes?

 

 

 

I asked for a quote of mine that was according to you a misrepresentation. 
 

Read my previous posts your obviously not. the majority of mosques are of charitable status and as such receive grants from the gov and other orgs, along with tax and associated public benefits. You need to do some research you have no Clue on this

I do hope we all support the Government’s funding to protect the two named communities in this press release and also that we can all agree the funding provided to protect these communities is not a cost against or of these communities but the cost of protecting both communities against the hate crimes to which both have been subjected:

 

For the record, I fully support the Government funding to provide increased security for both these communities.

 

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-commits-more-funding-to-protect-uk-muslims

8 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

I asked for a quote of mine that was according to you a misrepresentation. 
 

Read my previous posts your obviously not. the majority of mosques are of charitable status and as such receive grants from the gov and other orgs, along with tax and associated public benefits. You need to do some research you have no Clue on this

I’ve already explained in my post.

 

And went further in discussing the very positive news in the link you provided.

 

You should read it.

48 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Does this bother you when other buildings are being built?

 

If they are being built by members of a ideology that wants desperately to splatter my kids and I with a vehicle whilst out for a stroll, then yes. I'd say it would bother me.

1 minute ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

If they are being built by members of a ideology that wants desperately to splatter my kids and I with a vehicle whilst out for a stroll, then yes. I'd say it would bother me.

They aren’t,

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ve already explained in my post.

 

And went further in discussing the very positive news in the link you provided.

 

You should read it.

You cannot provide a quote because it was a false accusation and you continue with your dishonest debate. 

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

They aren’t,

Oh some are, more dishonesty from you

 

Mosque that has decades-long history of alleged extremism and hate speech, including an imam who gave sermon on how to STONE women 'correctly', is handed £2 MILLION grant - before civil servants rush to freeze it

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12473991/Civil-servants-rush-freeze-2-MILLION-grant-handed-mosque-decades-long-history-alleged-extremism-hate-speech-including-imam-gave-sermon-stone-women-correctly.html

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

For the record, I fully support the Government funding to provide increased security for both these communities.

For once I agree!

+1

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Do you have a link to this Mosque security budget and if so why do you not allocate that cost against the criminals who attack places of worship?

 

 

 

The UK government has allocated over £117 million to protect mosques, Muslim schools, and community centers from hate attacks. This funding will be used for CCTV, alarms, and fencing.  - https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-68529601

25 minutes ago, steve187 said:

The UK government has allocated over £117 million to protect mosques, Muslim schools, and community centers from hate attacks. This funding will be used for CCTV, alarms, and fencing.  - https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-68529601

Thank you, we already have the Government’s own press release.

 

Do you agree with me that it’s the Government’s duty to provide security to communities subjected to the threat of hate crimes?

26 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Thank you, we already have the Government’s own press release.

 

Do you agree with me that it’s the Government’s duty to provide security to communities subjected to the threat of hate crimes?

 

 

I say no.

27 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Thank you, we already have the Government’s own press release.

 

Do you agree with me that it’s the Government’s duty to provide security to communities subjected to the threat of hate crimes?

 

Not against those Mosques who are the ones that initiate the hate crimes no. 

 

Thankfully this Iman got deported, but only after his stint at Finsbury Park mosque

 

Captain hook imam of Finsbury Park Mosque,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza_al-Masri

 

Of course, there are so many more................

 

Charity Commission ‘examines’ British mosques that hosted pro-Hamas hate preachers
Sermons made since terrorist group’s October 7 attack include calls to ‘destroy Israel’, ‘kill the Jews’ and ‘wage your war for Allah'

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/03/charity-commission-examines-mosques-after-pro-hamas-sermons/

https://archive.ph/uYF9h

 

 

16 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So why the discussion of the father?

 

Unless of course there isn’t really a problem with the son, and it’s necessary to attempt to smear him with the outrage of his father expressing his own views.

 

Judges rule on matters of law.

 

Perhaps someone drafted the law loosely.

Or perhaps, as the law is reported as being intended for refugees from Ukraine, it was interpreted by the judge somewhat,umh, flexibly?

 

Says the poster formerly known as "herfiehandbag", don't worry, it's all above board!

22 minutes ago, JAG said:

Says the poster formerly known as "herfiehandbag"

You’ve lost me.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You’ve lost me.

That seems a very easy thing to do especxially when you ignore the actual question put to you in the post.

Another drug dealing family operating in uk

 

So did the judge misinterpret the law or was the law poorly drafted?