A Desert Dream Fades: The Rise and Fall of the Ivanpah Solar Plant

[Social Media]

 

From afar, the Ivanpah solar plant appears like a shimmering mirage in the vast Mojave Desert. Up close, it reveals itself as an otherworldly collection of hundreds of thousands of mirrors, each meticulously positioned to reflect sunlight toward three towering structures, each surpassing the height of the Statue of Liberty. When it launched in 2014 near the California-Nevada border, it was heralded as the future of solar energy. Just over a decade later, the facility is set to close.

 

 

Co-owner NRG Energy confirmed in January that it had begun unwinding contracts with power companies and, pending regulatory approval, would commence shutting down the plant in early 2026. The site may ultimately be repurposed for a different type of solar technology. To critics, Ivanpah has become a gleaming symbol of wasted taxpayer dollars and environmental mismanagement. Advocacy groups have long condemned its impact on desert wildlife. Supporters, however, argue that setbacks like these are an inevitable part of the search for effective renewable energy solutions.

 

When first conceived, Ivanpah’s technology—known as concentrated solar power or thermal solar—was considered revolutionary. The concept relied on an intricate system: thousands of computer-controlled mirrors, called heliostats, tracked the sun’s movement and directed its rays onto the three towers. Atop each stood boilers filled with water, heated by the concentrated sunlight until they produced steam, which then powered a turbine to generate electricity.

 

A key advantage of this approach was its ability to store heat, enabling power generation even when sunlight was unavailable, without the need for batteries. The project secured $1.6 billion in Department of Energy loan guarantees and agreements with utility companies Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and Southern California Edison to purchase its electricity under long-term contracts.

 

By the time it commenced operations in 2014, Ivanpah was the world’s largest solar thermal plant, spanning roughly five square miles of federally managed desert. “This project is a symbol of the exciting progress we are seeing across the industry,” then-Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz declared during the facility’s dedication ceremony in February 2014.

 

Despite such optimism, problems soon emerged. According to Jenny Chase, a solar analyst at BloombergNEF, the technology was finicky and never quite performed as intended. “These kinds of plants are just technically really difficult to operate,” she explained, noting that they incorporate the complex mechanical components of fossil fuel plants, such as turbines and moving parts, alongside the challenges of managing a distributed energy source. The system depended on precisely aligned mirrors that tracked the sun’s movements flawlessly—something that proved challenging to maintain.

 

However, Ivanpah’s greatest obstacle was the rapid decline in the cost of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels, which convert sunlight directly into electricity. Chase noted that PV technology became remarkably affordable in just a few years. “In some parts of the world, you can basically buy a solar module for the price of a fence panel,” she said. When Ivanpah was built, few could have predicted that PV solar and battery storage would become so inexpensive so quickly. NRG acknowledged that when power purchase agreements were signed in 2009, the pricing was competitive, but subsequent advancements in solar technology ultimately made alternative solutions far more cost-effective.

 

In January, NRG reached a deal with PG&E to terminate contracts that were originally set to run until 2039. This move, according to an NRG spokesperson, “will provide significant savings for California ratepayers.” Southern California Edison confirmed it remains in discussions with the plant’s owners and the Department of Energy regarding its contract.

 

For critics, Ivanpah’s impending shutdown is proof that the project was doomed from the start. “It was a financial boondoggle and environmental disaster,” said Julia Dowell, senior campaign organizer at the Sierra Club. She emphasized the environmental cost, stating, “The project’s construction destroyed irreplaceable pristine desert habitat.” The Mojave Desert, while an ideal location for harnessing solar energy, is also home to the threatened desert tortoise. Despite efforts by developers to mitigate harm by relocating the animals, many environmentalists argued the plant should never have been approved.

 

Another major concern was its impact on birds. Reports emerged of birds, dubbed “streamers,” being incinerated midair by the plant’s intense beams of light, further fueling opposition.

 

NRG declined to comment on the plant’s effect on wildlife.

 

Some have pointed to Ivanpah as an example of why government subsidies for renewable energy projects should be reconsidered. This perspective aligns with the approach taken by former President Donald Trump, who, early in his administration, halted approvals for new renewable energy developments on federal land.

 

However, clean energy experts argue that government investment in various technologies is essential. While some projects may fail, others, like photovoltaic solar, have thrived. Kenneth Gillingham, an economics professor at Yale School of the Environment, emphasized the unpredictability of technological success. “Picking winners is extremely difficult,” he said. “And it’s not a problem that some technologies are outcompeted by others, as long as innovation continues occurring.”

 

Though the Ivanpah plant’s days are numbered, its story underscores both the challenges and rapid evolution of the clean energy industry. While one vision for the future fades, another is already on the horizon.

 

Based on a report by CNN 2025-02-15

 

 

 

[blaze master]

 

Yet another Democrat blunder. This was Obamas f up. 

 

Shocker.

[NORDO]

Can you say "PELOSI"

[John Drake]

12 hours ago, Social Media said:

Another major concern was its impact on birds. Reports emerged of birds, dubbed “streamers,” being incinerated midair by the plant’s intense beams of light, further fueling opposition.

 

Should have gone along well with the "condor cuisinart" windmills that chopped up all those birds in California.

[The Old Bull]

So blowing five billion on an aircraft carrier is more responsible? All governments piss away money can't always predict the outcome.

[blaze master]

4 hours ago, NORDO said:

Can you say "PELOSI"

 

Ron Pelosi....trust me bro I had no idea.

 

Then there is Harry Read and his Chinese connections. Oh and his son too. 

 

Maybe the big guy is jealous.

[MalcolmB]

16 hours ago, Social Media said:

Ivanpah’s greatest obstacle was the rapid decline in the cost of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels, which convert sunlight directly into electricity. Chase noted that PV technology became remarkably affordable in just a few years. “In some parts of the world, you can basically buy a solar module for the price of a fence panel,” she said. When Ivanpah was built, few could have predicted that PV solar and battery storage would become so inexpensive so quickly.

Indeed it has. The same type of people that will be rubbish in this project would have been rubbish in solar and batteries ten years ago.

But rather than being pleased in this significant advancement they will double down and still be negative.

 

Mostly people that identify as “right wing”. 
Strange people.

[Keep Right]

It is unbelievable just how much money the left wing Democrats have wasted on their climate psychosis. So glad that Trump is putting a stop to this madness.

[blaze master]

8 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Indeed it has. The same type of people that will be rubbish in this project would have been rubbish in solar and batteries ten years ago.

But rather than being pleased in this significant advancement they will double down and still be negative.

 

Mostly people that identify as “right wing”. 
Strange people.

 

You mean people that are tired of government waste and shady deals for family and friends ? 

[Mike_Hunt]

2 hours ago, The Old Bull said:

So blowing five billion on an aircraft carrier is more responsible? All governments piss away money can't always predict the outcome.

Yes

[Yagoda]

16 hours ago, blaze master said:

 

Yet another Democrat blunder. This was Obamas f up. 

 

Shocker.

Global warming or climate change is an excuse for the Democrats and Socialists to steal.

[Tug]

Yea thewright brothers should have quit at their first failure or ford when his first auto failed……so it wasn’t efficient ok try something else ….

[Yagoda]

47 minutes ago, Tug said:

Yea thewright brothers should have quit at their first failure or ford when his first auto failed……so it wasn’t efficient ok try something else ….

Neither sucked off tax dollars

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Neither sucked off tax dollars

Exactly, they were spending their own money. 

 

California has so much excess solar they have to pay other states to take it. 

 

And at night, they have to buy power from the states the have to pay to take the power during the day. 

 

Over 160 years ago, the US built the transcontinental railroad in five years over mountains and rivers and valleys, over 3,000km, basically with picks, shovels and explosives. 

 

California High Speed Rail Project:

Proposition 1A passed in 2008

Awarded federal stimulus funds in 2010

Construction contracts began to be awarded in 2013

Construction stated January 2015.

Original projected completion: 2021

Original budget: $10 billion

Current projected completion: 2030-2033

Current projected budget: $28-35 billion

''The Merced–Bakersfield line is expected to be finished between 2030 and 2033, with passenger service starting around that time. However, the project's CEO has said that another $100 billion may be needed to finish the project, and some engineers and project managers believe it may not be completed in the 21st century.''