Shouldn't Ukraine already be petitioning the Supreme Court to re-instate military aid?

[CanadaSam]

In view of the treaty signed in Budapest in 1994, the US agreed to help and defend Ukraine against any military invasion by any party.

 

Can the Supreme Court in the US now take up this issue on an urgent basis, and rule that the US has to immediately re-instate all military aid?

 

In other words, can the Supreme Court rule against Trump's knee-jerk reaction to a petty personal squable, to save lives in the Ukraine?

[Harrisfan]

3 minutes ago, CanadaSam said:

In view of the treaty signed in Budapest in 1994, the US agreed to help and defend Ukraine against any military invasion by any party.

 

Can the Supreme Court in the US now take up this issue on an urgent basis, and rule that the US has to immediately re-instate all military aid?

 

In other words, can the Supreme Court rule against Trump's knee-jerk reaction to a petty personal squable, to save lives in the Ukraine?

Bound forever? Russia already breached it.

[expat_4_life]

1 hour ago, CanadaSam said:

In view of the treaty signed in Budapest in 1994, the US agreed to help and defend Ukraine against any military invasion by any party.

 

Can the Supreme Court in the US now take up this issue on an urgent basis, and rule that the US has to immediately re-instate all military aid?

 

In other words, can the Supreme Court rule against Trump's knee-jerk reaction to a petty personal squable, to save lives in the Ukraine?

 

No, it is not recognized as a Treaty. The Budapest Memorandum, signed in 1994, was never ratified by the U.S. Senate, a prerequisite for a treaty to become part of U.S. domestic law under Article VI of the Constitution (the Supremacy Clause). Without ratification, it doesn’t have the status of "supreme Law of the Land" that would allow its provisions to be directly enforced or challenged in U.S. courts. It’s an executive agreement, binding only as a political commitment, not a legal one within the U.S. system.

[frank83628]

3 hours ago, CanadaSam said:

In view of the treaty signed in Budapest in 1994, the US agreed to help and defend Ukraine against any military invasion by any party.

 

Can the Supreme Court in the US now take up this issue on an urgent basis, and rule that the US has to immediately re-instate all military aid?

 

In other words, can the Supreme Court rule against Trump's knee-jerk reaction to a petty personal squable, to save lives in the Ukraine?

Why are you lot so against ending the f-ing war? Trump campaigned on doing just that, yet all you idiots are insisting the deaths and destruction continues.  You're psychos. The radical left