Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: So, Trump said "illegal protests" and the OP added (in typical leftist fashion) "what he terms". Yeah, I got that part. No he didn’t simply say ‘illegal protests’. You obviously are able to defend what he did say, hence truncating it to two words. 1 1
ronnie50 Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Yellowtail said: So, Trump said "illegal protests" and the OP added (in typical leftist fashion) "what he terms". Yeah, I got that part. Well, I guess it isn't up to him to determine what protests are illegal. It's funny (not really) how Trump supporters forget that the judiciary and judges rule on what's legal and what's not. It ain't Sunny Boy who gets to do that. 1
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted March 6 Popular Post Posted March 6 Just now, Chomper Higgot said: No he didn’t simply say ‘illegal protests’. You obviously are able to defend what he did say, hence truncating it to two words. You're post only had a two word quote. So, what did he say? Did he say that he was going to withdraw federal funding from universities that allow what he terms illegal protests? No, he did not say that. Bring the quote. As always, you can't. 3 1
Popular Post SLOWHAND225 Posted March 6 Popular Post Posted March 6 12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Again, that’s a matter for the courts. It is not matter for Presidential edict. The courts have already decided on these types of protests. The 1st gives you the right to protest but blocking a road isn't legal You can protest but blocking the entrance to buildings, private or public isn't legal. You can protest but its not legal to block a sidewalk as it impedes my passage. and on and on. But you certainly should know that already, don't you ? 1 2 1
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted March 6 Popular Post Posted March 6 4 minutes ago, ronnie50 said: Well, I guess it isn't up to him to determine what protests are illegal. It's funny (not really) how Trump supporters forget that the judiciary and judges rule on what's legal and what's not. It ain't Sunny Boy who gets to do that. What funny (not really) that Trump-haters have to depend on lies. Why lie? No one thinks it's up to Trump to decide what's legal and what's not. 2 1 2
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted March 6 Popular Post Posted March 6 Just now, SLOWHAND225 said: The courts have already decided on these types of protests. The 1st gives you the right to protest but blocking a road isn't legal You can protest but blocking the entrance to buildings, private or public isn't legal. You can protest but its not legal to block a sidewalk as it impedes my passage. and on and on. But you certainly should know that already, don't you ? And people do not have free speech everywhere. One does not have free speech rights in the workplace, in the classroom or any number of other places. 2 1
ronnie50 Posted March 6 Posted March 6 12 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: So, Trump said "illegal protests" and the OP added (in typical leftist fashion) "what he terms". Yeah, I got that part. I don't get you. You are agreeing Trump said illiegal protests, but are taking issue with some other added words.. 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 Just now, ronnie50 said: I don't get you. You are agreeing Trump said illiegal protests, but are taking issue with some other added words.. Do you think some protests are illegal? If so, do you think people should be allowed to protest illegally? 1
Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: You're post only had a two word quote. So, what did he say? Did he say that he was going to withdraw federal funding from universities that allow what he terms illegal protests? No, he did not say that. Bring the quote. As always, you can't. Here you go: 1
Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 7 minutes ago, SLOWHAND225 said: The courts have already decided on these types of protests. The 1st gives you the right to protest but blocking a road isn't legal You can protest but blocking the entrance to buildings, private or public isn't legal. You can protest but its not legal to block a sidewalk as it impedes my passage. and on and on. But you certainly should know that already, don't you ? Yes I do know there are activities that are themselves illegal. And you are correct, the courts decide. 1
Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: What funny (not really) that Trump-haters have to depend on lies. Why lie? No one thinks it's up to Trump to decide what's legal and what's not. Except for Trump himself. 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Here you go: So as I assumed, he us not making protests illegal as was your claim. 2
Bkk Brian Posted March 6 Posted March 6 27 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: “He's threatening to withdraw federal funding from universities that allow illegal protests.” From the OP: Donald Trump has escalated his stance against pro-Palestinian demonstrations on college campuses, threatening to withdraw federal funding from universities that allow what he terms "illegal protests."” They are illegal protests when they are occupying and barricading themselves on private property. Trump is correct. 1
blaze master Posted March 6 Posted March 6 4 hours ago, WDSmart said: Oops! So much for Trump's promise to defend free speech as granted in our 1st Amendment.... 😮 Are you American? You dont even know your own freedoms or constitution. Wow talk about ignorance. 1
Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: And people do not have free speech everywhere. One does not have free speech rights in the workplace, in the classroom or any number of other places. Which is not at issue. The First Amendment does not say what protests are or are not permitted. It does deny the Government, the President included the power to legislate or otherwise inhibit free speech. Gitlow v. New York (1925) 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said: Which is not at issue. The First Amendment does not say what protests are or are not permitted. It does deny the Government, the President included the power to legislate or otherwise inhibit free speech. Gitlow v. New York (1925) The president is not attempting to inhibit free speech, nor is he trying to say what protests are or are not permitted. He is only asking that existing law be enforced. 1
Tug Posted March 6 Posted March 6 4 hours ago, thaipo7 said: These Marxist leaning students and the Marxist spewing professors are not what we need in these schools. YES cut their funding and stop the funding being received from Qatar and other Anti Israel countries. I’m sure we all agree the protests in favor of hammas are despicable/the protests in favor of stopping the slaughter of Palestinian civilians well ya I don’t like seeing that,I do realize that hammas is using them as shields so it couldn’t be helped that being said it is the #1 FIRST AMENDMENT he’s trying to kill all stop 🛑 of course no one supports this particular bunch of nutters that being said it’s their right to do so.when they break laws by all means arrest them .hands off the first amendment don’t be short sighted we all know were this is headed especially using such an emotional example. 1 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Tug said: I’m sure we all agree the protests in favor of hammas are despicable/the protests in favor of stopping the slaughter of Palestinian civilians well ya I don’t like seeing that,I do realize that hammas is using them as shields so it couldn’t be helped that being said it is the #1 FIRST AMENDMENT he’s trying to kill all stop 🛑 of course no one supports this particular bunch of nutters that being said it’s their right to do so.when they break laws by all means arrest them .hands off the first amendment don’t be short sighted we all know were this is headed especially using such an emotional example. How is he trying to kill the first amendment by attempting to enforce existing law? He has said nothing about disallowing legal protests. 1 1
Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Yellowtail said: The president is not attempting to inhibit free speech, nor is he trying to say what protests are or are not permitted. He is only asking that existing law be enforced. Let’s play your game. Do you have a quote of the President actually asking for exiting law to be enforced? 1
Popular Post Nick Carter icp Posted March 6 Popular Post Posted March 6 45 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Again, that’s a matter for the courts. It is not matter for Presidential edict. There was illegal activity occurring . It wasn't Trump who ruled it illegal, he just mentioned it 2 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said: Let’s play your game. Do you have a quote of the President actually asking for exiting law to be enforced? 1 1
Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 Just now, Yellowtail said: There’s no asking for exiting law to be enforced‘ in that statement, nor was there the last time you posted it. 1 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said: There’s no asking for exiting law to be enforced‘ in that statement, nor was there the last time you posted it. There is nothing in the statement that makes protests illegal, as was your false claim. 1
Bkk Brian Posted March 6 Posted March 6 8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Let’s play your game. Do you have a quote of the President actually asking for exiting law to be enforced? Its not a game, its a fact. Note the "illegal protests" Trump refers to. That's exactly what they are in the OP. Enough of your dishonest debating 1
Nick Carter icp Posted March 6 Posted March 6 9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Let’s play your game. Do you have a quote of the President actually asking for exiting law to be enforced? Exiting, Exciting or existing ? 1 1
Chomper Higgot Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said: Exiting, Exciting or existing ? Take your pick. Trump has not asked for the existing law to be enforced, and if he did that’s a request he needs to direct to the police and prosecutors. Universities are not a part of law enforcement.
Bkk Brian Posted March 6 Posted March 6 4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Take your pick. Trump has not asked for the existing law to be enforced, and if he did that’s a request he needs to direct to the police and prosecutors. Universities are not a part of law enforcement. More deflection from the facts of the illegal protests taking place and the terrorist supporters celebrating the massacres of Oct 7th 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Take your pick. Trump has not asked for the existing law to be enforced, and if he did that’s a request he needs to direct to the police and prosecutors. There is nothing in the statement that makes protests illegal, as was your false claim. 2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Universities are not a part of law enforcement. So, universities should do nothing if MAGAs were beating up trans kids? 1
Nick Carter icp Posted March 6 Posted March 6 4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Take your pick. Trump has not asked for the existing law to be enforced, and if he did that’s a request he needs to direct to the police and prosecutors. Universities are not a part of law enforcement. Why should Trump have to ask Universities to do anything ? Its not Trumps job to deal with those issues 1
Yellowtail Posted March 6 Posted March 6 You can bet if pro-lifers were blocking access to Stanford's abortion clinic the discussion would be quite different... 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now