Jump to content

Thai PM Tackles Overstaying Tourists with Visa-Free Scheme Revamp


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, NorthernRyland said:

But it's easier than ever to say long term with the DTV so what impact will this have? You can stay for 5 years if you can get together 500k baht ONE time and apply for a cooking class or something and then open your illegal elephant pants themed yoga cafe on Ko Pha Ngan.

 

 

It's the DTV they need to address. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Joseph98765 said:

....and when they were talking to attract more europeans this morning, now they come with this....555555

 

European and Chinese tourists with money, families, don't want to go to places where there is crime galore, Bendirom Brits partying on drugs and full of violence, Russian draft dodgers looking for fights in Thailand but ironically not in Ukraine, Indians sleeping 12 to a room or on a beach, and viewing every woman as a prositute, scam artists everywhere, violence, drugs. 

 

The reputation of the country worldwide has been tarnished, and it's attracting cheap trash. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Here is a controversial idea... make missed 90 reporting an offense on par with overstay, then make presenting the TM47 receipt AND passport mandatory (pdf and photos acceptable) for all sorts of mundane reasons (checking into a hotel, requesting bank services, obtaining a SIM card, booking tickets, boarding planes/trains/ferries, etc.) -- no more using Thai DL... watch the number of overstays decrease significantly.

  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
6 hours ago, sikishrory said:

60 days isn't the issue. This is in line with other countries.

It's when you can get 60 days + 60 days + 60 days + extensions through corrupt visa runs that this becomes an issue.

It's not a review thats needed but the simple enforcement of the law.

The most-pertinent reply to this thread yet!

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, sikishrory said:

60 days isn't the issue. This is in line with other countries.

It's when you can get 60 days + 60 days + 60 days + extensions through corrupt visa runs that this becomes an issue.

It's not a review thats needed but the simple enforcement of the law.

There is no corruption in Thailand.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, sikishrory said:

60 days isn't the issue. This is in line with other countries.

It's when you can get 60 days + 60 days + 60 days + extensions through corrupt visa runs that this becomes an issue.

It's not a review thats needed but the simple enforcement of the law.

There is no corruption in Thailand.

Posted
10 hours ago, ftpjtm said:

 

Ordered a review? Sounds like an indecisive move.

 

And very oddly, no mention whatsoever in the OP about the recent government ministry public pronouncements about already planning to (or considering, depending on what day's report one reads) reduce the now-standard 60-day visa-free entry back to the prior, longstanding 30-day period that had existed until last year.

 

Does the PM even remember / recall what visa-free entry policy this government had held for a long time prior to the change/extension last year?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, ftpjtm said:

 

Ordered a review? Sounds like an indecisive move.

 

Daddy was busy on his phone didn't answere must have been important call so had to make the move by herself.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Meanwhile article in Bangkok Post @ 24 April - 11am....
With Thailand losing out to Vietnam as the most-visited nation in Southeast Asia among Chinese tourists in the first quarter, the Association of Thai Travel Agents (Atta) has urged the government to offer more competitive prices, noting that Vietnam's travel costs are now 30% lower and it boasts more fresh attractions.

In the first quarter, the Tourism and Sports Ministry reported that Thailand received 1.3 million Chinese arrivals, while Vietnam welcomed 1.5 million Chinese tourists, a 178% year-on-year increase according to the Vietnam National Authority of Tourism.

Posted
On 4/23/2025 at 4:58 PM, jts-khorat said:

 

Or, simply accept that there is a large number of long-time tourists simply spending money, and a very small percentage of "tour guides" and "bar owners" (who nonetheless bring financial turnaround).

 

I remember, as I came to Thailand in the late 90s, that I was working for months, as I heard for the first time that something like a work permit even exists. And I would never have gotten one for the job I did then (nobody on Phuket had even heard of the internet or web design, there were only 2000 fixed phone lines on the whole island).

 

What I am trying to say is: the jobs a longstay tourist is likely to engage in is the grey economy, where people don't pay taxes and proper business setups most likely will be prohibitive for the tiny returns. There is a good chance that just checking up on everything costs more than simply ignoring this small percentage. Better spend the money on improving tourist infrastructure.

 

But who am I to advise the Thai government?

Yeah, there are always two sides to the story.  Walking around Bangkok there are lots of storefronts that have been unrented for months or even years. An arguement can be made that all the Thai bureaucratic restrictions and regulations are cost prohibitive. Work illegal or go bust.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...