Social Media Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago A Fleeting Encounter in Rome: Trump, Zelensky, and the Shadows of a Broader Conflict The unexpected death of Pope Francis created a rare and charged encounter between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky in Rome, marking their first face-to-face meeting since their ill-fated Oval Office conversation in February. Their 15-minute discussion was described by both sides as productive, with Zelensky notably calling it potentially “historic.” Good meeting. We discussed a lot one on one. Hoping for results on everything we covered. Protecting lives of our people. Full and unconditional ceasefire. Reliable and lasting peace that will prevent another war from breaking out. Very symbolic meeting that has potential to… pic.twitter.com/q4ZhVXCjw0 — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) April 26, 2025 This meeting took place at a delicate moment. Vladimir Putin’s strategic pressure has nudged the United States president closer toward Ukraine, yet Zelensky is acutely aware that this shift is unlikely to alter the deeper trajectory of the war. Even a promising meeting with Trump cannot mask the bleak realities Ukraine faces. French President Emmanuel Macron appeared eager to join the meeting but was firmly rebuffed by Trump, a move that some have seen as fortuitous. It was the Europeans, after all, who had reportedly helped coach Zelensky ahead of his previous, disastrous White House visit. In this light, Zelensky’s optimism that his latest conversation with Trump could be “potentially historic” might well owe something to divine intervention. As Zelensky wrote on X, “Good meeting. We discussed a lot one on one. Hoping for results on everything we covered. Protecting lives of our people. Full and unconditional ceasefire. Reliable and lasting peace that will prevent another war from breaking out.” Meanwhile, Putin continues to weigh the costs of prolonging the war against the severe damage it is inflicting on Russia’s economy. Should a ceasefire and a negotiated settlement be reached, it could dramatically strengthen his position. In Moscow, he would easily be able to present any pause in fighting as a victory, regardless of the devastating human and economic toll the war has exacted from the Russian people. Zelensky, on the other hand, faces a far more perilous future. Accepting a ceasefire that cedes large portions of Ukrainian territory would almost certainly spell the end of his presidency. Putin is undoubtedly preparing for such an outcome, ready to exploit any political chaos that might follow in Kyiv. Looking more broadly, the future for Ukraine — and indeed the wider West — appears grim. NATO has revealed itself to be less formidable than hoped, a paper tiger just as Putin always believed. Despite the lofty promises enshrined in Article 5, there remains deep skepticism that NATO nations would truly commit their own soldiers to defend a member state under direct attack, particularly in Eastern Europe where future Russian aggression is likely to be focused. Rather than focusing blame on Donald Trump for the current dangerous state of affairs, European countries must finally get serious about defense, something they have neglected since the end of the Cold War. This would require massive investment in military capabilities, diverting funds away from social programs, international aid, and other ever-expanding government initiatives. Beyond just money, it demands preparing Western societies themselves to accept the sacrifices and hardships that serious national defense entails, a difficult prospect after decades of relative comfort and expanding welfare states. The alternative to facing these hard truths is starkly visible in Ukraine. As harrowing as the current conflict is, there have been few credible alternatives proposed that would end the bloodshed without simply emboldening future aggressions. The image of Trump and Zelensky, hunched together in quiet conversation inside St. Peter’s Basilica, may well linger in the collective memory for years to come — a haunting symbol of a world at a crossroads. Adpated by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph 2025-04-28 1 1
newbee2022 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago It was indeed historic because the POTUS was wearing a blue suit instead of black Not even buttoned. No behaviour at least
Will B Good Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I find it horrifying that a (chance?) 15min discussion could result in something historic? You have to assume both were fully briefed, all details had been thrashed out over weeks and days, and this was just for show. 1
Jingthing Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I don't believe that Trump will ever pivot from being Putin's poodle to actually supporting Ukraine. He has these little blips where it looks to the very naive that he may see the light, but it's always vapor. Putin does NOT want peace! You can't have peace negotiations with such a person. The only hope is to FORCE them into needing that. Their continued maximalist goals going back decades remain intact. A puppet Ukraine and then taking over Moldova, the Baltics, and even Poland if NATO remains fallen apart thanks to the maga fascists. 2 1 3
Jingthing Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Will B Good said: I find it horrifying that a (chance?) 15min discussion could result in something historic? You have to assume both were fully briefed, all details had been thrashed out over weeks and days, and this was just for show. It did make an iconic photograph. But can't see how it changes the war. Trump is still with his broken record garbage for the most part. 1 1 1
Will B Good Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Jingthing said: It did make an iconic photograph. But can't see how it changes the war. Trump is still with his broken record garbage for the most part. The driving force is Trump's desperate desire to be awarded the Nobel peace prize......if he can bring an end to the war (or be seen to) he may well be in with a shout. Once the chance of the peace prize has gone he will just walk away.
Jingthing Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Will B Good said: The driving force is Trump's desperate desire to be awarded the Nobel peace prize......if he can bring an end to the war (or be seen to) he may well be in with a shout. Once the chance of the peace prize has gone he will just walk away. He does want that but it'll never happen.
mfd101 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 6 hours ago, Social Media said: Looking more broadly, the future for Ukraine — and indeed the wider West — appears grim. NATO has revealed itself to be less formidable than hoped, a paper tiger just as Putin always believed. Despite the lofty promises enshrined in Article 5, there remains deep skepticism that NATO nations would truly commit their own soldiers to defend a member state under direct attack, particularly in Eastern Europe where future Russian aggression is likely to be focused. This is the key para. above. Pretty gloomy. Thank goodness we live in Thailand, so clever at twisting and turning in the breeze.
Will B Good Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, Jingthing said: He does want that but it'll never happen. God forbid that it does.......however.....I'd be happy to see him win it, if it resulted in an end to the war.
Jingthing Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Will B Good said: God forbid that it does.......however.....I'd be happy to see him win it, if it resulted in an end to the war. He's not on a path to end the war. The only thing Putin will accept is a surrender by Ukraine setting the Russians up for eventual complete control of Ukraine and more. The Nobel people may have been dumb with the Obama prize granted, but they won't award a total capitulation to Putin with the prize. Impossible. 1 2
animalmagic Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Jingthing said: He's not on a path to end the war. The only thing Putin will accept is a surrender by Ukraine setting the Russians up for eventual complete control of Ukraine and more. The Nobel people may have been dumb with the Obama prize granted, but they won't award a total capitulation to Putin with the prize. Impossible. Trump repeatedly claims the loss of Crimea to the Russians was Obama's fault and that he let it happen. Simple solution is Trump helps Ukraine recovers all of its lost territories then he can claim he's better than Obama. 1
Hakuna Matata Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Trump's STUNNING 5-Word SNUB To Macron Before Meeting Zelensky At Pope Funeral | Watch
Hakuna Matata Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Russian missile strikes after Trump-Zelenskyy meeting
Hakuna Matata Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Trump and Zelensky hold 'productive' talks at Pope's funeral
Sydebolle Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago If this meeting unlocked the deadlock, then the whole exercise of a state funeral was worth every single Euro! 1 1
Purdey Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Don't give up any land Zelensky. Russia occupies land roughly the size of the entire east coast of America. They are invaders and should get out. 1
vinny41 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Sydebolle said: If this meeting unlocked the deadlock, then the whole exercise of a state funeral was worth every single Euro! Trump 'thinks' Zelensky ready to give up Crimea to Russia US President Donald Trump has said he thinks his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky is willing to give up Crimea to Russia as part of a peace deal - despite Kyiv's previous rejections of any such proposal. Asked if he thought the Ukrainian president was ready to cede control of its southern peninsula, which was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014, Trump replied: "I think so." https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20z20kyvxxo
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now