As usual, Trump is crying "fraud"

[candide]

As he did about elections, Trump is whining and making up fraud accusations when numbers are not good. Now it's about polls! 🤣

 

Trump's poll numbers are so abysmal he's crying "fraud"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-poll-numbers-abysmal-hes-131930785.html

 

 

Also attached the latest poll numbers

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

[Tug]

Aww poor poor Donnie I’ve besotted myself by blubbering about how everybody picks on poor defenseless Donnie…….who would have expected that folks wouldn’t take kindly to him tanking the economy acting the fool and betraying Americas ideals….Biggley un fair blubber blubber……guess he doesn’t like the consequences for his actions ehh?

[BLMFem]

Let's see those numbers when the shelves start to go empty.

[save the frogs]

how come the brits don't start so many threads about their political leaders?

 

[Tug]

13 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

how come the brits don't start so many threads about their political leaders?

 

Perhaps theirs aren’t trying to kill the worlds economy nor trying to turn the United sister into a kleptocracy…….just saying

[billd766]

14 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

how come the brits don't start so many threads about their political leaders?

 

Probably because the UK political leaders are nowhere as near stupid as Trump.

 

Plus most Brit posters understand about staying on the topic at hand, unlike you. Of course if you are a Brit there is absolute no reason why you shouldn't start a new thread about that topic, instead of trying to divert this topic.

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, billd766 said:

Probably because the UK political leaders are nowhere as near stupid as Trump.

 

Plus most Brit posters understand about staying on the topic at hand, unlike you. Of course if you are a Brit there is absolute no reason why you shouldn't start a new thread about that topic, instead of trying to divert this topic.

 

It's just sth that popped into my head as there are probably way more Brits in Thailand and AN than Americans.

I wasn't going to start a separate thread about it.

But I think it's a valid question.

 

[cjinchiangrai]

Because fraud is what he would do.

[rough diamond]

1 hour ago, save the frogs said:

how come the brits don't start so many threads about their political leaders?

 

Because although they are politicians and lie they do so on such a lower scale than Trump.

PS; that apples to most non American Presidents/Leaders whether elected or dictators!

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, Tug said:

Perhaps theirs aren’t trying to kill the worlds economy nor trying to turn the United sister into a kleptocracy…….just saying

Please tell us, with reference to Federal Law, how Trump is turning the "United sister[sic]" into a kleptocracy.

 

The response will be more invective, flaming and thumbs down emojis.

[BLMFem]

1 hour ago, save the frogs said:

how come the brits don't start so many threads about their political leaders?

 

It probably has something to do with the fact that their PM doesn't do his damnedest to start a world wide recession.

[Harrisfan]

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

Probably because the UK political leaders are nowhere as near stupid as Trump.

 

Plus most Brit posters understand about staying on the topic at hand, unlike you. Of course if you are a Brit there is absolute no reason why you shouldn't start a new thread about that topic, instead of trying to divert this topic.

Keir is -20

[Tug]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Please tell us, with reference to Federal Law, how Trump is turning the "United sister[sic]" into a kleptocracy.

 

The response will be more invective, flaming and thumbs down emojis.

 

56 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Really strange that you end most of your posts with a prediction that your post will attract lots of flaming and negative emojis. It's like you're asking for more attention than you're actually getting.

Makes you come across as needy.

I’ve been missing some of his more creative trumptard put downs lol 😂 some of them are pretty creative and worth a chuckle.anyway yagoda if you can’t see,or blind to,or possibly trying to help the states become something closer to the style government of the Russian federation I can’t help you.I don’t want that and will allways sound off you can count on it.

[Yagoda]

2 minutes ago, Tug said:

trumptard

A flame, together with ignorance, viz

 

3 minutes ago, Tug said:

if you can’t see,or blind to,or possibly trying to help the states become something closer to the style government of the Russian federation I can’t help you.

says it all. 

 

As to your ignorance, you could not factually or legally show anything to support any contention you have ever made. I dare you to try.

[BLMFem]

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

Keir is -20

Thank you for that informative post.

[candide]

More whining, as usual! 

 

"They say Trump only has a 44% approval rating," he said. "Well, that's actually not bad. But when you figure that if it were a legit poll, it would be in the 60s or 70s, is – these people are a bunch of crooked people."

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/29/nx-s1-5380216/trump-100-days-michigan-rally

[Ben Zioner]

Obvious, the idiots liked him, until they started losing money. 

[Bannoi]

I am no fan of Trump in fact I despise the man but he is just doing everything he said he would and more.

 

His core supporters are still behind him for how long remains to be seen.

 

As for those who don't support him but didn't  bother to vote they've only got themselves to blame.

 

 

[NoDisplayName]

15 hours ago, candide said:

As he did about elections, Trump is whining and making up fraud accusations when numbers are not good. Now it's about polls! 🤣

 

Trump's poll numbers are so abysmal he's crying "fraud"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-poll-numbers-abysmal-hes-131930785.html

 

Interesting use of the word "fraud" in quotation marks.  I read the article twice, but that word only appeared once...........in the clickbait headline.  Trump himself did not say "fraud."

 

As to the numbers, did you bother to read what the great pollster wrote?

 

....in the latest New York Times poll, only 37 percent of respondents are Trump 2024 voters. But Mr. Trump received 50 percent of the vote.

...

Same for the ABC/Washington Post/Ipsos poll. They polled 2,464 adults — 1,992 registered voters, but only 842 Trump voters.

That’s only 34 percent made up of Trump’s 2024 voters. Yet he got nearly 50 percent of the popular vote.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/04/29/fake_polls_wont_tell_you_about_trumps_100-day_success_152722.html

 

That's how fake polls work, by skewing the pool of respondents to guarantee the preferred outcome.

[billd766]

3 hours ago, save the frogs said:

 

It's just sth that popped into my head as there are probably way more Brits in Thailand and AN than Americans.

I wasn't going to start a separate thread about it.

But I think it's a valid question.

 

OK. Start your thread and keep a check on the response and compare it to this thread.

[billd766]

2 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Really strange that you end most of your posts with a prediction that your post will attract lots of flaming and negative emojis. It's like you're asking for more attention than you're actually getting.

Makes you come across as needy.

He reminds me of somebody screaming out to the world world,

 

"Look at me, look at me. I am still here and I cannot be ignored".

 

However he has been on my ignore list for quite a while, so the only time I see his posts are if somebody responds to him.

 

 

[candide]

39 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

Interesting use of the word "fraud" in quotation marks.  I read the article twice, but that word only appeared once...........in the clickbait headline.  Trump himself did not say "fraud."

 

As to the numbers, did you bother to read what the great pollster wrote?

 

....in the latest New York Times poll, only 37 percent of respondents are Trump 2024 voters. But Mr. Trump received 50 percent of the vote.

...

Same for the ABC/Washington Post/Ipsos poll. They polled 2,464 adults — 1,992 registered voters, but only 842 Trump voters.

That’s only 34 percent made up of Trump’s 2024 voters. Yet he got nearly 50 percent of the popular vote.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/04/29/fake_polls_wont_tell_you_about_trumps_100-day_success_152722.html

 

That's how fake polls work, by skewing the pool of respondents to guarantee the preferred outcome.

Complete B.S. for the ignorant! 

 

The so-called expert is not an expert or is dishonest. He should know that all polsters apply weigh to data in order to correct such issues!

 

Ex about the Ipsos poll

The data were weighted to adjust for gender by age, race/ethnicity, education, Census region by metropolitan status, household income, language dominance, 2024 presidential vote choice, and party identification.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/abc-news-washington-post-ipsos-april-2025

 

[Harrisfan]

50 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

Interesting use of the word "fraud" in quotation marks.  I read the article twice, but that word only appeared once...........in the clickbait headline.  Trump himself did not say "fraud."

 

As to the numbers, did you bother to read what the great pollster wrote?

 

....in the latest New York Times poll, only 37 percent of respondents are Trump 2024 voters. But Mr. Trump received 50 percent of the vote.

...

Same for the ABC/Washington Post/Ipsos poll. They polled 2,464 adults — 1,992 registered voters, but only 842 Trump voters.

That’s only 34 percent made up of Trump’s 2024 voters. Yet he got nearly 50 percent of the popular vote.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/04/29/fake_polls_wont_tell_you_about_trumps_100-day_success_152722.html

 

That's how fake polls work, by skewing the pool of respondents to guarantee the preferred outcome.

Correct. Leftists bs polls

[candide]

5 minutes ago, candide said:

Complete B.S. for the ignorant! 

 

The so-called expert is not an expert or is dishonest. He should know that all polsters apply weigh to data in order to correct such issues!

 

Ex about the Ipsos poll

The data were weighted to adjust for gender by age, race/ethnicity, education, Census region by metropolitan status, household income, language dominance, 2024 presidential vote choice, and party identification.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/abc-news-washington-post-ipsos-april-2025

 

 

2 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Correct. Leftists bs polls

B.S. reply from you! 

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, candide said:

 

B.S. reply from you! 

Who won the election? 

[NoDisplayName]

15 minutes ago, candide said:

Ex about the Ipsos poll

The data were weighted to adjust for gender by age, race/ethnicity, education, Census region by metropolitan status, household income, language dominance, 2024 presidential vote choice, and party identification.

 

Absolutely.

 

The respondents were weighted 35% voted for Trump, 65% voted for word salad or stayed home.

[candide]

1 minute ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

Absolutely.

 

The respondents were weighted 35% voted for Trump, 65% voted for word salad or stayed home.

Lame attempt at deflection. Your ignorant claim has been debunked! 

[Harrisfan]

4 minutes ago, candide said:

Lame attempt at deflection. Your ignorant claim has been debunked! 

He quoted the pollsters

[candide]

Just now, Harrisfan said:

He quoted the pollsters

I quoted the poll report. I remember that you claimed to be familiar with statistics, so you certainly know about data weighting.

[Harrisfan]

Just now, candide said:

I quoted the poll report. I remember that you claimed to be familiar with statistics, so you certainly know about data weighting.

I know about fools looking at silly polls 3.5 years from an election