Press Regulator Clears Columnist Allison Pearson in Dispute with Essex Police

[Social Media]

 

Press Regulator Sides with Columnist Allison Pearson in Dispute with Essex Police

 

In a ruling that has sparked renewed scrutiny of police conduct, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) has dismissed a complaint by Essex Police over reporting related to a high-profile columnist’s clash with the force. Allison Pearson, a columnist for The Telegraph, was cleared by the regulator after Essex Police challenged the accuracy of reports about an unannounced visit by officers to her home on Remembrance Sunday last year.

 

The dispute centers on a tweet Pearson had posted and later deleted, which a complainant claimed had incited racial hatred. Nearly a year after the tweet was removed, Pearson was visited at home by two police officers, who informed her she was under investigation. Pearson later wrote in her column that she had been told she was being investigated for a non-crime hate incident (NCHI), a designation used when police document actions perceived to be motivated by hate but that fall short of criminality. However, Essex Police claimed she was actually being investigated for a criminal offence, and subsequently filed a complaint with Ipso accusing The Telegraph of publishing inaccurate information.

 

But Ipso found the police complaint to be without merit. In its judgment, the regulator emphasized that The Telegraph had appropriately included Essex Police’s official statement — which confirmed the investigation was into a criminal offence — while also reporting Pearson’s personal account of the encounter. According to Ipso, “care had been taken not to publish inaccurate information” because The Telegraph had sought comment from the police before publication, and the force had not disputed or corrected Pearson’s recollection of what officers told her during the visit.

 

Mark Lewis, Pearson’s legal representative, expressed disbelief that the police had chosen to escalate the matter to the press regulator in the first place. “I was bemused as to why the police found it appropriate to file a report to a regulator,” he said. He added that the Ipso ruling would now allow Pearson’s legal team to move forward with her claim against Essex Police and the Essex Police and Crime Commissioner for damages.

 

Pearson herself welcomed the decision and reiterated her commitment to holding the police accountable. “I am delighted that Ipso has confirmed I was entitled to tell the public what happened to me on the morning of Remembrance Sunday over a tweet deleted a year earlier. I felt it was in the public interest, and still do,” she said. “My legal team will now pursue my case against Essex Police and the commissioner of police.”

 

The case has stirred broader debate about freedom of the press, the definition and use of non-crime hate incidents, and how police interact with journalists. Critics argue the visit to Pearson’s home and the force’s subsequent complaint to a media regulator raise serious concerns about proportionality and accountability in law enforcement.

 

Essex Police, which has been contacted for comment, has so far not issued a public response to the Ipso ruling.

 

Related Topics:

A Police Visit on Remembrance Sunday Reveals the Reality of Our Two-Tier Justice System

Female Journalists Rally Around Allison Pearson Amid Fears for Press Freedom

Police Face Criticism Over Internal Review Clearing Essex Force

 

  Adpated by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph  2025-05-03

 

 

[Smokey and the Bandit]

This proves the police are out of control in the UK!🙄

[loong]

2 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

This proves the police are out of control in the UK!🙄

 

No, I think that they are being very tightly controlled, but unfortunately, by morons!

[Watawattana]

22 minutes ago, loong said:

 

No, I think that they are being very tightly controlled, but unfortunately, by morons!

Totally agree.  This police visit happened due to political pressure, and happened under a Conservative Government; a government that was full of looney lefties that allowed wakers to run rampant.

[soalbundy]

If it's a non-crime hate incident surely one could simply refuse to speak with the officers, tell them to pi$$ off (politely) and close the door.