Jump to content

Fears of Unrest in UK as India-Pakistan Tensions Spark London Embassy Protest


Recommended Posts

Posted
40 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Another example of the UK importing international conflicts onto the streets of Indigenous British people.

 

What were the benefits of all this? Someone remind me...

 

The best case I've heard so far is cheap nurses...

Get a curry at 2am...that's about it mate

 

22 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

The history of the rise and fall of the British empire in India is fascinating, I recommend you look into it, you’ve obviously got some gaps in your knowledge to fill.

Some.fasinating history channels although they tend to skew the truth slightly. I

Posted
28 minutes ago, chickenslegs said:

Why can't they settle their differences in the traditional way ... a dance-off.

 

Or a game of cricket

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

Its  the Muslims fault for attacking India recently in a terrorist attack .

I wonder whether the " Its not the Muslims fault for their terrorist attack, this war started in 1948 " mob will be out on force in this thread  ?

Rubbish

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


 

Desperate stuff Nick.

 

Back to what you said.

 


“Partition happened after Indian Independence from Scotland and England ”

 

 

Just admit you were wrong, it won’t hurt.

 

   Partition happened the day after British forces left India in 1947 .

I have already provided the dates .

Anyway, lets keep to the current  story about what's happening today .

The Irish love going on about history and apportioning the blame to Brits for everything  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

I think there was a wee bit more to it than that. 

Why don't you add some context? 

Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Another example of the UK importing international conflicts onto the streets of Indigenous British people.

 

...and now islamic blasphemy laws.

 

Today, a man was in court for burning a koran outside the Turkish Embassy in London. He was charged with 'harassing Islam and causing it alarm and distress'. I didn't realise you could do that to an abstract concept. 🤔

 

https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/derby-news/derby-man-charged-after-koran-9948858

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Scotland & England announced India independence in 1946 and the violence erupted when S&E departed India in 1947

 

Didn't Northern Ireland and Wales recognise Indian and Pakistani independence?

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Why does it seem London is the epicenter for all these demonstrations?

Similar thing with the Palestine/Gaza protests.

 

because we let them all in

we have every nationality living in london

Posted
10 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Wasn't it a colony?

 

India and Pakistan became fully independent in August 1947. India and Pakistan chose to go their separate ways. It was not a British decision.  The two countries have had 78 years to get their affairs in order. The current dispute is in respect to Kashmir, a majority muslim region that is occupied in large part by India. The Kashmir conflict is local and has nothing to do with the British.

 

Posted

The Pakistani and Bengali faux outrage is well practiced. They were last out in full force  last year  to harass and attack jewish and Israeli organizations and anyone else that the mobs assumed might have been jewish.  Soon it will be the Hindus turn to be targets of the attacks.

 

4 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Pakistanis desecrating India's flag 

 

They  have a lot of practice doing that. It's like a past time for them. It does beg the question why western nations give pakistan foreign aid.

 

 

 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

The Pakistani and Bengali faux outrage is well practiced. They were last out in full force  last year  to harass and attack jewish and Israeli organizations and anyone else that the mobs assumed might have been jewish.  Soon it will be the Hindus turn to be targets of the attacks.

 

 

   The British Hindus and Sikhs will not accept any abuse , they will be out on the streets tooled up and mob handed 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Why don't you add some context? 

It's not my job to educate you. You have sufficient keywords to start you off. Good luck on your quest for betterment. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

India and Pakistan became fully independent in August 1947. India and Pakistan chose to go their separate ways. It was not a British decision.  The two countries have had 78 years to get their affairs in order. The current dispute is in respect to Kashmir, a majority muslim region that is occupied in large part by India. The Kashmir conflict is local and has nothing to do with the British.

 

What a nonsense😂😂😂.

Nothing to do with the British?😂😂😂

Go to school again 🥰

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The roots of this conflict is based in British History.

If Britain would not have exploited India/Pakistan and if they would have ended their cruel colonialism over India/Pakistan and let them free...we wouldn't have the current problem. 👍

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

The roots of this conflict go back far further than the British Empire. The region was Hindu, then Buddhist, then conquered by the Muslims, then became part of a Sikh empire , then under Sikh/British control......

The Maharaja of the area (a Sikh aligned to the British) was the one who refused to cede to Pakistani control (during separation), and asked for help from the British and Hindus.

It is an issue that is far more complex than British colonialism!

Posted

Some special ones in this thread by the looks. ‘Special’ = previously banned members that have nothing better to do than not know history and talk tripe. Pretty sad really. Find yourselves a girlfriend already. 

Posted
1 hour ago, newbee2022 said:

What a nonsense😂😂😂.

Nothing to do with the British?😂😂😂

Go to school again 🥰

If it hadn't been for Britain and the partition of India, that place would be the same as Gaza and Israel...the indigenous population.were war mongering parasites, battling about castes and religion..stop playing the victim and blaming someone else. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

It's not my job to educate you. You have sufficient keywords to start you off. Good luck on your quest for betterment. 

You have clue on what you are talking about.  You are a poser. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, baansgr said:

If it hadn't been for Britain and the partition of India, that place would be the same as Gaza and Israel...the indigenous population.were war mongering parasites, battling about castes and religion..stop playing the victim and blaming someone else. 

Pathetic excuse or assumptions. The cruelty of the British in India is documented. 

Why do you think they were kicked out? Same in Kenya?

Because they've been so nice?

No, they were slaughtering and misuse the people.

The Empire is gone, even you don't like the facts. 👍

Posted
28 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Pathetic excuse or assumptions. The cruelty of the British in India is documented. 

Why do you think they were kicked out? Same in Kenya?

Because they've been so nice?

No, they were slaughtering and misuse the people.

The Empire is gone, even you don't like the facts. 👍

They were not kicked out, they left voluntarily..as for the Empire, it's just a shame they all followed us to UK...no pride some people,.would you really want to live in a country where the inhabitants had treated you so badly, no pride, no shame. Go and cry in the ganges mate, jealousy is a bad thing that will eat you away...just accept it 👍 

Posted
45 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

You have clue on what you are talking about.  You are a poser. 

 

I must admit that I have no clue as to what you are havering on about. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, baansgr said:

They were not kicked out, they left voluntarily

You're joking. The history is different: obviously British were forced to leave. You ever came across with a name of Gandhi??😳

Posted
14 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

You're joking. The history is different: obviously British were forced to leave. You ever came across with a name of Gandhi??😳

They left voluntarily...not kicked out as you said...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...