So this case came to be because a scorned woman, who wanted Coombs as a husband, could not have him and the relationship ended. She then extorted Coombs and received 30 million USD.

 

However, the authorities read her case docs, and someone got it in their head that Coombs should pay for his lifestyle choices and domestic assault. The mistake they made was to go for racketeering charges.

 

Now it looks like Coombs will get three years.

 

But it's not guaranteed, the judge denied him bail, so the judge is clearly ill-disposed towards Coombs. Could be more than 3 years.

On 5/17/2025 at 10:18 AM, Cameroni said:

Casandra Ventura has not spared the most graphic detail in her testimony, talking about the Freak Offs:

 

"Combs, she continued, or one of the male escorts hired to have sex with her, sometimes "would urinate on me" during these Freak Offs.

 

Ventura testified she was “choking” because there was “too much urine in my mouth,” sometimes from both Combs and the escort participating at the same time.

 

https://people.com/cassie-claims-diddy-forced-sex-period-11734172

 

Imagine her husband Alex Fine seeing his baby mama on the stand testifying how she was drinking urine from Combs and other men.

 

I guess he won't mind that much, since Ventura brings in 30 million USD. Hard work though, clearly.

 

 

Bedroom watersports is freak play ?

2 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

Bedroom watersports is freak play ?

 

That's the worst they got up to. No dogs involved.

6 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

That's the worst they got up to. No dogs involved.

 

Just normal everyday fun... no freak at all.

7 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

 

Just normal everyday fun... no freak at all.

 

The problem was that this kind of fun left Coombs open to extortion by the woman who participated with him in these freak-offs, Cassie Ventura. She launched the lawsuit that precipated all this, and got paid 30 million dollars.

 

That a man who likes to have sex, and is free to explore his sexual fantasies is not well liked, is clearly established by this case.

 

Coombs did not engage in racketeering, that was ridiculous from the get go.

 

However, men who have a lot of women, who get a lot of sex, especially unusual kind, are targets now.

57 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

So this case came to be because a scorned woman, who wanted Coombs as a husband, could not have him and the relationship ended. She then extorted Coombs and received 30 million USD.

 

However, the authorities read her case docs, and someone got it in their head that Coombs should pay for his lifestyle choices and domestic assault. The mistake they made was to go for racketeering charges.

 

Now it looks like Coombs will get three years.

 

But it's not guaranteed, the judge denied him bail, so the judge is clearly ill-disposed towards Coombs. Could be more than 3 years.

3 years - time served - time off for good behaviour = out the day after sentencing.

10 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

3 years - time served - time off for good behaviour = out the day after sentencing.

 

Well, let's see, he's served 10 months, he may spend a year or longer in jail. That's if the judge follows protocol, but he seems biased against Coombs, he took out a black male juror and now denied him bail.

 

The irony in all this? This black man was convicted on two charges of "transportation for prostitution" under the 1910 Mann Act, which was aimed at "white slavery". The idea was to protect immigrant women from being lured into prostitution.

 

However, it being a 1910 act, it also included "immoral purposes", so strictly speaking the jury had to find Coombs guilty of this, even if he did not transport women for prostitution.