Science Three Years to the Brink: Climate Scientists Warn of Imminent 1.5C Breach

[jerrytr]

1 hour ago, Zapitapi said:

since 40 years i hear these phrases in slight different ways... 

 

In 10 years I was flooded and had to knock down one house on the water in the US.the replacement had to be built on stilts per the Emergency Flood rules because they were have to rescue more every year. They want to stop putting emergency worker in danger. I love when I hear nothing happens. 300k later it's no joke.

[Harrisfan]

17 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

No, I am not wrong. When I type in my book's title, I get a warning that it has been prohibited. 🥺

You are wrong. My IQ is well above yours and you are wrong by 90 years. Musk agrees with me. His IQ is well above yours. You're a poor socialist.

[Harrisfan]

20 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

No, I am not wrong. When I type in my book's title, I get a warning that it has been prohibited. 🥺

You're aren't a climate scientist even. Show me proof you are or have an IQ above 110.

[Harrisfan]

Temps fell in May

 

https://www.drroyspencer.com/

[Harrisfan]

Another climate expert who is skeptical

 

 

https://judithcurry.com/

[WDSmart]

14 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

You are wrong. My IQ is well above yours and you are wrong by 90 years. Musk agrees with me. His IQ is well above yours. You're a poor socialist.

How could you know that your and Musk's IQs are above mine?

You are right about one thing, though: I am a socialist. 

[Harrisfan]

Just now, WDSmart said:

How could you know that your and Musk's IQs are above mine?

You are right about one thing, though: I am a socialist. 

Mine is 130+. I read Musk is 160. Your posts indicate fairly average. You don't even have a climate science degree let alone a high IQ. If you did you would prove it. I've read 100+ papers on it. You're dead wrong. Stick to pad thai.

[Harrisfan]

2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

You are right about one thing, though: I am a socialist. 

If you were smart you would join the scam and make millions like Gore. Gore scored a C in science. I came first in Physics and topped Math 4 years in a row. The co2 theory has about 25% substance and the rest is bs. There is nothing to worry about til 2100.

[Harrisfan]

19. 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
20. 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
21. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
22. 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
23. 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
24. 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
25. 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
26. 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015 (additional link)
27. 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’

 

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/50-years-of-failed-doomsday-eco-pocalyptic-predictions-the-so-called-experts-are-0-50/

[hotsun]

2 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

2006 we have 4 years to act

2025 we have 3 years to act

2044 we have 2 years to act

2063 we have 1 year to act

2072 we have 6 months to act

2091 we have 3 months to act

 

Just a natural sequence of bs

 

Greta's grandkids will run the scams

Having grandkids means that shes having kids, whos gonna have kids with her?

[Harrisfan]

 Richard Lindzen exposes the climate change movement as a fabricated, politicised power play motivated by malice and profit.

 

https://www.biznews.com/energy/2023/04/21/climate-change-5

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, hotsun said:

Having grandkids means that shes having kids, whos gonna have kids with her?

Adopt?

[WDSmart]

12 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

You're aren't a climate scientist even. Show me proof you are or have an IQ above 110.

I am not a climate scientist, but I could be called a "computer scientist." I do have a bachelor's degree in Computer Science and Engineering. And my book is not primarily about climate change but about how human technology is destroying the Earth's biosphere, which does certainly include "climate change." 

The last (only?) time my IQ was measured by a reputable organization was when I was about 18 and just graduating from high school. I scored very high on my SAT test and, along with about 20 kids from Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, and Ohio, was taken to Notre Dame University for more testing. I'm 79 now, so that was 61 years ago. I don't have any documents that show those results, but I can assure you it was more than 110.

Since then, I've learned that a high IQ might indicate that you can better understand how things work and make "good" decisions based on that, but it doesn't guarantee that you will make the "right" decision, especially when it comes to social issues. In fact, in my book, I refer to technology as "the physical instantiation of the human intellect." So you could consider advanced technology to be like a high IQ. Technology is what is destroying the Earth, and the cause of that is hubris, and Musk and Trump are undeniable examples of that. 

I hope you are not. 

 

[Harrisfan]

"The bottom line was that 65% of the U.S. linear warming trend between 1895 and 2023 was due to increasing population density at the suburban and urban stations; 8% of the warming was due to urbanization at rural stations. Most of that UHI effect warming occurred before 1970."

 

 

https://www.drroyspencer.com/

 

So most of the warming was population increases which results in more heat absorption. Farmers know the nights are cooler than the city.

[Harrisfan]

3 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I am not a climate scientist, but I could be called a "computer scientist." I do have a bachelor's degree in Computer Science and Engineering. And my book is not primarily about climate change but about how human technology is destroying the Earth's biosphere, which does certainly include "climate change." 

The last (only?) time my IQ was measured by a reputable organization was when I was about 18 and just graduating from high school. I scored very high on my SAT test and, along with about 20 kids from Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, and Ohio, was taken to Notre Dame University for more testing. I'm 79 now, so that was 61 years ago. I don't have any documents that show those results, but I can assure you it was more than 110.

Since then, I've learned that a high IQ might indicate that you can better understand how things work and make "good" decisions based on that, but it doesn't guarantee that you will make the "right" decision, especially when it comes to social issues. In fact, in my book, I refer to technology as "the physical instantiation of the human intellect." So you could consider advanced technology to be like a high IQ. Technology is what is destroying the Earth, and the cause of that is hubris, and Musk and Trump are undeniable examples of that. 

I hope you are not. 

 

Urbanisation explains 2/3 of warming. Plenty of climate scientists are skeptics. So I would not read your book. Their websites are more advanced.

 

(Farmers knows this)

[Harrisfan]

Here's more. 

 

"Working with satellite data, scientists measured that surface temperatures in cities were sometimes up to 10-15°C higher than in their rural surroundings. The study also estimated that the temperature in extreme heat islands in cities around the world has risen on average by 1°C in since 2003."

 

https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/jrc-news-and-updates/cities-are-often-10-15-degc-hotter-their-rural-surroundings-2022-07-25_en

 

[WDSmart]

4 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Urbanisation explains 2/3 of warming. Plenty of climate scientists are skeptics. So I would not read your book. Their websites are more advanced.

 

(Farmers knows this)

Urbanization is just an example of the growth in the use of technology, which, in my book, I define as one of the three causes of humans' continual degradation of the Earth's biosphere. The other two causes I define are hubris and overpopulation. 

[Harrisfan]

Just now, WDSmart said:

Urbanization is just an example of the growth in the use of technology, which, in my book, I define as one of the three causes of humans' continual degradation of the Earth's biosphere. The other two causes I define are hubris and overpopulation. 

So you want to limit child births?

[BritManToo]

18 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

So you want to limit child births?

Like all socialists, they want to prevent white folk from having babies.

Climate change science is thinly disguised anti-white racism.

China, India and Africa can continue to have as many babies as they like.

[Harrisfan]

3 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Like all socialists, they want to prevent white folk from having babies.

Climate change science is thinly disguised anti-white racism.

China, India and Africa can continue to have as many babies as they like.

Be less workers to support the pensioners. Be a disaster. Cut off pension mass poverty in elderly.

[WDSmart]

10 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

11 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Urbanization is just an example of the growth in the use of technology, which, in my book, I define as one of the three causes of humans' continual degradation of the Earth's biosphere. The other two causes I define are hubris and overpopulation. 

So you want to limit child births?

Yes, in my book, I propose a one-woman, one-child policy. But even if persistently implemented, it would take about 360 years to reduce the human population to about 10% of what it is now. I think such a population size could exist on Earth, employing all our technology to provide everyone with a "comfortable" lifestyle. But, I don't think we have that long, so even that will not work.

In my book, I say we are already "over the cliff" on this degradation of the Earth, and even if we were to try to reduce our pollution and destruction, which we've shown no intention of doing, we will not succeed in preventing the eventual and now inevitable extinction of most of Earth's lifeforms, including, hopefully, our own. 

[BangkokHank]

To be able to convince people to accept a dystopian, unelected, one-world global government, there needs to be the appearance of there being a global problem that can only be solved by a global government. "Climate change" was chosen for that purpose - precisely because it is easy to fool people about, as most people can't distinguish between climate and weather. There is no climate emergency.

[SunnyinBangrak]

4 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

In 2006 Gore said we had 4 years to act 

What happened to Gores promises polar bears will be extinct by 2020 thanks to polar ice having disappeared? I rest my case🤣😂

[Grusa]

To summarise succinctly ( and not just climate)

 

The world is going to Hell in a handbasket. And nobody who actually matters gives a 2-penny F.