UK Ukrainian Activists Demand U.K. Cut Energy Ties with Russia-Linked Firm

[Social Media]

 

Ukrainian Activists Demand U.K. Cut Energy Ties with Russia-Linked Firm

 

LONDON — Ukrainian campaigners are calling on Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s new government to immediately sever procurement ties with energy suppliers that maintain links to Russian fossil fuels. In a letter sent Wednesday to Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds, a coalition of Ukrainian and pro-Ukraine advocacy groups denounced the British government's contract with TotalEnergies Gas & Power, the U.K. arm of the French energy conglomerate TotalEnergies, which still imports Russian gas into Europe.

 

The revelations, first reported by POLITICO, show that gas from TotalEnergies powers not only 10 Downing Street but numerous other government buildings across Whitehall. The government’s deal with the firm, reportedly valued at up to £8 billion, has come under intense criticism from Ukrainian campaigners who argue it contradicts the U.K.'s stated position of reducing dependence on Russian energy.

 

The campaigners declared in their letter that such a contract “undermines the U.K.’s public commitment to ending dependence on Putin’s bloody oil and gas.” They continued: “It sets an example which profiteering companies have been only too happy to follow. This in turn has undermined the entire Western sanctions regime.”

 

Although a government spokesperson defended the procurement process, saying, “All government contracts are openly published online, and follow all U.K. sanctions and regulations,” activists remain unconvinced. “Like most U.K. suppliers, TotalEnergies purchases gas from the U.K. domestic open market, where the presence of Russian gas is extremely unlikely,” the spokesperson added.

 

Still, campaigners are demanding transparency and action. Their letter, signed by seven organizations either based in Ukraine or supporting the country from abroad, asks Thomas-Symonds to disclose the full extent of Whitehall’s contracts with TotalEnergies. It also urges him to commit to ending any procurement from firms still tied to Russian energy and to articulate a plan for transitioning to “clean, conflict-free energy sources.”

 

Iryna Ptashnyk, a senior researcher at the Ukrainian group Razom We Stand, which led the campaign, said, “It was indefensible that British taxpayers’ money is flowing to TotalEnergies. The U.K. government must urgently show leadership [and] end these contracts.”

 

While TotalEnergies insists its contracts with European clients involve Russian gas only from the Yamal LNG facility in Siberia — a long-standing agreement it claims it cannot exit — concerns remain high. The company maintains that none of its gas supplied under U.K. contracts is sourced from Russia, and that it complies with the U.K.’s ban on Russian LNG imports. Nevertheless, critics argue that its continued trade in Russian gas elsewhere undermines international sanctions and helps finance the Kremlin’s war effort.

 

The influence of TotalEnergies reaches well beyond Whitehall. According to campaigners, its U.K. subsidiary also supplies gas to NHS hospitals, schools, local councils, and even the Bank of England through a range of public sector contracts.

 

Stephen Hoffman, deputy director of UK Friends of Ukraine, condemned the government’s ongoing relationship with the firm. “British government buildings should not be heated with gas that comes from a company with such deep ties to Russia’s fossil fuel industry,” he said.

 

In response, the government spokesperson emphasized the broader transition strategy, stating, “We are making the U.K. a clean energy superpower to get off the roller coaster of fossil fuel markets controlled by dictators like Putin, replacing that with clean homegrown power we control, and have ended all imports of Russian fossil fuels in response to Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.”

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Politico  2025-07-04

 

 

[Hakuna Matata]

Russia’s Gas Glut: How Europe’s Energy Divorce Is Changing the World

 

 

[Purdey]

On the one hand there are those who scoff at turning to green energy, which means energy must come from... where? It sounds like the UK is backed into a corner.

First, we had Blood Diamonds, now we have Blood Gas. 

[Geoff914]

5 hours ago, Purdey said:

On the one hand there are those who scoff at turning to green energy, which means energy must come from... where? It sounds like the UK is backed into a corner.

First, we had Blood Diamonds, now we have Blood Gas. 

I thought Russia was sanctioned so it would be illegal to trade with Russia? What am I missing, not a hypocritical Government I hope.