Ah, so having established that your analysis of Emad is based on his supposedly “Indian” cultural background, despite the inconvenient fact that he was born in Jordan, moved to England at seven, and is the son of Bangladeshi parents, you have now expanded the theory to millions of Indian tech workers. And apparently this still isn’t racist. You say you are making “no value judgements” while claiming that Indian upper caste people lack compassion, regard lower caste people as “almost sub human,” carry this ethos into Western countries, and then ask whether we should “trust the future of the world to an Indian.” That is quite an impressive definition of “no value judgement.” The funniest part remains that your argument about Emad being a “product of his culture” depends on a culture he isn’t even from. You have constructed an elaborate theory about Indian culture and Indian tech geniuses, then conveniently inserted a British Bangladeshi man born in Jordan into it. Perhaps establish whether your Exhibit A is actually Indian before deciding what his supposed Indian culture tells us about the future of humanity. At this point, the only thing your deluded argument seems to establish is that you have personally imagined an entire worldview around a man who, rather inconveniently for your supposedly non racist and non judgmental theory, isn’t even Indian. You have somehow got the central premise of your own argument completely wrong, as it turns out to be entirely false. One could hardly construct a more impressive demonstration of intellectual buffoonery, even if one tried.
Create an account or sign in to comment