Trump visit Scotland

[Patong2021]

20 hours ago, thaipo7 said:

What did you have to say when Biden gave out $Billions on his final two weeks in office with $2 billion going to Stacy Abrams to a phony company that only has $100 in the bank?  Huh, what did you say then.  Most corrupt?  Wait until all is known about Obama and his administration.

 Link? Supporting evidence? Repeating false claims that were posted on Facebook is not credible. People who regurgitate false claims are either malicious or gullible and or not capable of rational thought.  Tracy Abrams did not receive  $2 billion.

 

There was a public tender of the grant that was to be used to  improve and upgrade 72,000 US homes and result in  a utility savings  of $1.26 billion for homeowners.  It was a transparent process. Expert panels and federal staff reviews selected the finalists.   A coalition of clean energy groups called Power Forward Communities received the federal grant. The group was one of three recipients of funding under the National Clean Investment Fund, which is part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

Power Forward Communities includes five organizations: Rewiring America, Enterprise Community Partners, the Local Initiatives Support Corporation, United Way Worldwide and Habitat for Humanity International. Abrams served briefly as senior counsel for Rewiring America, but left the  group in 2024, before the grant was awarded. She had no formal role in Power Forward Communities. There is no evidence that Tracy Abrams received any of the grant money either directly or indirectly.She  has not been paid anything  by the  coalition.      https://rhcjcnews.com/4430/what-is-true/abrams-was-not-given-2b-in-public-funds-for-elections/

 

If Tracy Abrams had done something illegal or questionable, surely, the great powers that be of the Trump administration would have arrested and charged her by now. Take a hint from the Republicans who have since dropped the false allegation.

[Will B Good]

Just now, Yellowtail said:

"Trump Scores Historic Win as Supreme Court Reins in Lower Courts’ Overreach"

Trump Scores Historic Win as Supreme Court Reins in Lower Courts’ Overreach | American Enterprise Institute - AEI

 

and?....Laws, however well written, end up having to be interpreted in a multitude of situations.......that's why you have tiers leading up to your SCOTUS......what you don't need/want is one person deciding what the laws are or how they should be interpreted.

[novacova]

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Federal judges don't stop anything.........they apply the laws approved by congress or stick to the constitution.....

Some do and others don’t, some make up laws as they go along and apply their feelings to the rulings.

[Will B Good]

Just now, novacova said:

Some do and others don’t, some make up laws as they go along and apply their feelings to the rulings.

Some make up laws?

[Yellowtail]

Just now, Will B Good said:

 

and?....Laws, however well written, end up having to be interpreted in a multitude of situations.......that's why you have tiers leading up to your SCOTUS......what you don't need/want is one person deciding what the laws are or how they should be interpreted.

About 80% of the lower court ruling against Trump's executive orders have been overturned. 

 

 

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

About 80% of the lower court ruling against Trump's executive orders have been overturned. 

 

 

 

...and you don't think that relates to him being seen to contravene US laws?

[metisdead]

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

[Yellowtail]

12 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

...and you don't think that relates to him being seen to contravene US laws?

No, I think it shows the opposite. 

 

The ~20% that have not been overturned are still on appeal. 

[Will B Good]

Just now, Yellowtail said:

No, I think it shows the opposite. 

 

The ~20% that have not been overturned are still on appeal. 

 

Easy solution.....stop issuing EOs like confetti or make sure they comply with the law and the constitution....job done.

[Tug]

38 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You thought it hilarious? 

Absolutely hilarious keep in mind trump is beyond vain look at that weird thing on his head and all the orange makeup lol. heck people effin DIED because his narcissistic personality disorder wouldn’t allow him to wear a mask cause it would smear his makeup.yup if it annoys him great!

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Easy solution.....stop issuing EOs like confetti or make sure they comply with the law and the constitution....job done.

That the lower court ruling against Trump's executive orders have been overturned shows that the executive orders do comply with the law. 

 

You do understand that in the US, when the lower court's ruling is overturned, it means the lower court's ruling was incorrect, yes? 

[EVENKEEL]

1 hour ago, transam said:

Wrong thread, chap........🤗 

The truth shall set you free.

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

That the lower court ruling against Trump's executive orders have been overturned shows that the executive orders do comply with the law. 

 

You do understand that in the US, when the lower court's ruling is overturned, it means the lower court's ruling was incorrect, yes? 

 

 

You're correct that when a higher court overturns a lower court’s ruling, it typically means the lower court’s decision was found to be legally flawed. But that doesn’t always mean the underlying policy or executive order is definitively lawful—it just means the higher court disagreed with the lower court’s reasoning or found procedural issues that warranted reversal.

 

Blocked by a Lower Court

On February 21, 2025, U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson issued a nationwide injunction, finding the orders likely violated the First Amendment and Due Process Clause due to vagueness and viewpoint discrimination.

 

Overturned by a Higher Court

On March 14, 2025, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary stay, allowing enforcement of the orders while the appeal proceeds. The panel found the government had shown a likelihood of success on appeal.

 

Block Reinstated 

In May and June 2025, other district courts and a San Francisco-based appeals court reinstated blocks on specific provisions, especially those affecting birthright citizenship and state funding tied to DEI compliance. These rulings cited constitutional concerns and exceptions to the Supreme Court’s recent limits on nationwide injunctions.

[novacova]

30 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Some make up laws?

Stop pretending, you know as well as anyone. Recently Boasberg issued an order blocking deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act which was nothing more than an activist bogus bleeding heart felt ruling.

[Yellowtail]

6 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

You're correct that when a higher court overturns a lower court’s ruling, it typically means the lower court’s decision was found to be legally flawed. But that doesn’t always mean the underlying policy or executive order is definitively lawful—it just means the higher court disagreed with the lower court’s reasoning or found procedural issues that warranted reversal.

 

Blocked by a Lower Court

On February 21, 2025, U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson issued a nationwide injunction, finding the orders likely violated the First Amendment and Due Process Clause due to vagueness and viewpoint discrimination.

 

Overturned by a Higher Court

On March 14, 2025, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary stay, allowing enforcement of the orders while the appeal proceeds. The panel found the government had shown a likelihood of success on appeal.

 

Block Reinstated 

In May and June 2025, other district courts and a San Francisco-based appeals court reinstated blocks on specific provisions, especially those affecting birthright citizenship and state funding tied to DEI compliance. These rulings cited constitutional concerns and exceptions to the Supreme Court’s recent limits on nationwide injunctions.

But it's the highest court that has ruled in favor of the Trump Administration 80% of the time. 

[Will B Good]

2 minutes ago, novacova said:

Stop pretending, you know as well as anyone. Recently Boasberg issued an order blocking deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act which was nothing more than an activist bogus bleeding heart felt ruling.

 

Boasberg’s ruling wasn’t fully overturned in substance—it was procedurally displaced, with the Supreme Court requiring due process protections but allowing deportations to resume under stricter conditions.

 

A 5-4 ruling from a heavily loaded SCOTUS

 

Contempt Hearings: These are still being pursued, contempt proceedings against the Trump administration for allegedly defying his original order to turn back deportation flights.

Habeas Challenges: Migrants can still file individual habeas corpus petitions in Texas to contest their removals, as required by the Supreme Court ruling.

Appeals Court Briefing: The D.C. Circuit Court recently ordered new briefs to assess whether recent developments—like the transfer of detainees from El Salvador to Venezuela—affect the case’s posture

 

 

Not quite as clear cut as a Judge making up the law.

[Will B Good]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

But it's the highest court that has ruled in favor of the Trump Administration 80% of the time. 

 

A heavily loaded, totally biased SCOTUS....well there's a surprise.....a court that granted Trump immunity (and reluctantly previous presidents)

[BeastOfBodmin]

21 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

Yes.....she is dyslexic aparentiully.

Lysdexic?

[novacova]

7 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

A heavily loaded, totally biased SCOTUS....well there's a surprise.....a court that granted Trump immunity (and reluctantly previous presidents)

 

50 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Some make up laws?

 

[Yellowtail]

31 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

A heavily loaded, totally biased SCOTUS....well there's a surprise.....a court that granted Trump immunity (and reluctantly previous presidents)

5555555555555555555

[NanLaew]

21 hours ago, thaipo7 said:

What did you have to say when Biden gave out $Billions on his final two weeks in office with $2 billion going to Stacy Abrams to a phony company that only has $100 in the bank?  Huh, what did you say then.  Most corrupt?  Wait until all is known about Obama and his administration.

 

That's a real serious case of whataboutery you got there @thaipo7, are you taking anything for it?

[Yellowtail]

25 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

That's a real serious case of whataboutery you got there @thaipo7, are you taking anything for it?

No, it's a real serious case of whataboutthehypocrisyoftheleft 

[BarraMarra]

I thought this Thread was about Trumps visit to Scotland mmmm

[Yellowtail]

13 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

I thought this Thread was about Trumps visit to Scotland mmmm

No, it's about the left's obsession with Trump's penis.

[BarraMarra]

Yes its the Yanks obsession to go into freefall. As soon as a new thread appears its boom, an hour later the thread title is not even mentioned.

[Yellowtail]

5 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Yes its the Yanks obsession to go into freefall. As soon as a new thread appears its boom, an hour later the thread title is not even mentioned.

Blame the Yanks if you like, but it seems to be the Trump-obsessed Eurotrash dragging everything off topic. 

[SunnyinBangrak]

3 hours ago, Tug said:

Hugh??are you from another planet?

Do you not think if there was credible evidence of Trump corruption (not fantasies from notorious laptop deniers and misinformation posters) that Bragg/James/Merchen/Biden's controllers would have prosecuted him for that, rather than gin up nonsensical unspecified charges around an expired 15 year old misdemeanor? Think man, think.

 

I'm glad they did this blatant lawfare as when it happens to Obama on real treason/election interference and cheating charges the hivemind will look bonkers trying to claim its unconstitutional to prosecute an ex Pres. Game. Set and match wokies. Its all over but the crying.

[DezLez]

3 hours ago, simon43 said:

Top bloke that Trump guy!!  I wish he was in charge of the UK...

Is that because you want rid of him from the US?

[transam]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Blame the Yanks if you like, but it seems to be the Trump-obsessed Eurotrash dragging everything off topic. 

Why are we Eurotrash, after all, your Trump who is trashing yours, not us...............😱.......🤭

[BarraMarra]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Blame the Yanks if you like, but it seems to be the Trump-obsessed Eurotrash dragging everything off topic. 

All you have to do is read the next post after this one Yellowtail. It has nothing to do with Trumps visit to Scotland so Don't be looking at the Eurotrash as a Scapegoat. I rest my case.