Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Aussie Women Get Green Light to Sue Qatar Airways for Airport Ordeal

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

afar.brightspotcdn.webp

Picture courtesy of Lukas Souza/Unsplash

 

Five Australian women have cleared a major hurdle, gaining the right to sue Qatar Airways. The case stems from a 2020 incident at Doha airport, where they were strip-searched after a baby was found abandoned. Initially, a judge dismissed their case, citing limited airline accountability.

 

The women's appeal argued that the initial ruling, which exempted Qatar Airways under global travel laws, was flawed. Now, Australia's Federal Court has overturned this, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The women are seeking damages for the invasive searches, which they say resulted in severe mental trauma.

 

This legal battle, initiated in 2021, targets Qatar Airways, Qatar's Civil Aviation Authority, and airport operator Matar. The women allege "unlawful physical contact" and false imprisonment, aiming for justice for the ordeal they endured alongside similar searches affecting UK and New Zealand travellers.

 

All parties involved originally pushed for the case to be dismissed. In April 2024, Justice John Halley ruled against Qatar Airways' liability under the Montreal Convention. He argued that the airline's staff couldn't have influenced Qatari police actions or the examinations conducted onsite.

 

While the case against Qatar's aviation regulator was dismissed due to immunity from foreign prosecution, avenues remain open against Qatar Airways and Matar. Justices Angus Stewart, Debra Mortimer, and James Stellios underscored the necessity for trial-based deliberation, allowing the case to move forward.

 

The women, whose UK and NZ counterparts aren't part of this suit, maintain their harrowing experience demands justice. Their lawyer, Damian Sturzaker, expressed relief at the decision, emphasising their deserved compensation and courtroom opportunities.

 

The incident caused lasting repercussions, with accounts of immense distress. One woman recounted the ordeal as akin to being "raped," while another felt she was being kidnapped, highlighting the severe emotional aftermath, reported BBC.

 

The invasive searches sparked a significant global outcry at the time.

 

Despite a criminal charge that resulted in a suspended sentence for an airport official, the women view pursuing this legal route as essential because they believe Qatari authorities have taken insufficient action. They have called for a formal apology and changes to airport procedures to prevent repeat incidents.

 

The case is now primed for trial in the Federal Court, spotlighting an indispensable pursuit for accountability and change. The implications of this proceeding could resonate widely, advocating for the protection of traveller rights in sensitive security procedures.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-07-30

 

image.gif

 

image.png

  • Replies 66
  • Views 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • DonniePeverley
    DonniePeverley

    What actually happened ? Poor article. 

  • mikeymike100
    mikeymike100

    Yes very poor, here is a brief explanation! Five Australian women are suing Qatar Airways and Matar, the operator of Hamad International Airport, following an incident on October 2, 2020, at Doha

  • More like basic biology.  A woman who has just given birth has some tells.  

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, webfact said:

they were strip-searched after a baby was found abandoned

How is the baby doing, did they find the mother, was she an Aussie or Kiwi? 

 

  • Popular Post

What actually happened ? Poor article. 

  • Popular Post
8 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

What actually happened ? Poor article. 

Yes very poor, here is a brief explanation!

Five Australian women are suing Qatar Airways and Matar, the operator of Hamad International Airport, following an incident on October 2, 2020, at Doha airport. The women, part of a group of over a dozen passengers, were forcibly removed from a Sydney-bound Qatar Airways flight by armed guards and subjected to non-consensual physical examinations, including invasive gynecological searches, in ambulances on the tarmac. This was triggered by the discovery of a newborn baby abandoned in a bathroom, as authorities sought to identify the mother. The women are seeking damages for unlawful physical contact, false imprisonment, negligence, and mental health impacts, including depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

8 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

What actually happened ? Poor article. 

The OP says "The case stems from a 2020 incident at Doha airport, where they were strip-searched after a baby was found abandoned."

 

  • Popular Post

Qatar Airways like to think there the Worlds top Airline but go against them and you find out how they deal with people who say things about them. Ask Josh Cahill ( Airline Vlogger )  he has been banned from flying Qatar Airways because he posted bad service on a flight.

  • Popular Post
4 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

They were deeply wronged. 

 

 

Yes, that's why they pursue legal action against Qatar Airways, like terriers. The principle of it. Nothing to do with the truck loads of cash they hope to get, I'm sure.

 

You realise if Qatar Airways has to shell out on a big judgement, this will make flights more expensive for all of us?

  • Popular Post

This time they actually have a good case and I hope they win big!

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

They were deeply wronged.  By Qatari authorities and personnel, in Qatar.

 

They deserve their day in a Qatari court.  Not an Aussie court.  But good luck with that.

 

I'd like to see them get a buttload of money in a settlement.  But not in Australia.

 

Problem is if it was in Qatar the odds would be stacked against them probably, Qatar courts would have a Qatari  judge, is he gonna be fair and unbiased ??

1 hour ago, impulse said:

I'd like to see them get a buttload of money in a settlement.  But not in Australia.

 

Can you explain why not in an Australian court, since that actually would increase their chances on a fair ruling.

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

You realise if Qatar Airways has to shell out on a big judgement, this will make flights more expensive for all of us?

Don't cry too much from your pocket.

How the hell is a strip-search gonna help to identify the mother?! 

  • Popular Post
4 minutes ago, pacovl46 said:

How the hell is a strip-search gonna help to identify the mother?! 

Arab logic. 

2 hours ago, CallumWK said:

 

Can you explain why not in an Australian court, since that actually would increase their chances on a fair ruling.

 

Go ahead and sue in an Australian court.  But don't be surprised if a Qatari citizen sues some Aussie company in a Qatari court for some slight that happened to them in Aus.  Under whatever strange laws the Qataris see fit.  Can you see where that's a Pandora's box?

 

Just spitballing here, but what if a bunch of Qatari women decided to sue for $100 million because they were subjected to lifting their veil and compromising their modesty going through security in an Aus Airport?  In a Qatari court, they may win...

 

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, TedG said:
1 hour ago, pacovl46 said:

How the hell is a strip-search gonna help to identify the mother?! 

Arab logic. 

 

More like basic biology.  A woman who has just given birth has some tells.

 

Just now, impulse said:

Go ahead and sue in an Australian court.  But don't be surprised if a Qatari citizen sues some Aussie company in a Qatari court for some slight that happened to them in Aus.  Under whatever strange laws the Qataris see fit.  Can you see where that's a Pandora's box?

 

A so called "opening of a Pandora's box" has nothing to do with this if it is a legitimate case!

If it is legitimate then go ahead and to hell with any  so called whataboutism!

1 hour ago, pacovl46 said:

How the hell is a strip-search gonna help to identify the mother?! 

 

I would think that a doctor can see if a lady recently has given birth, and without knowing the details, I presume that ladies involved were pregnant.

5 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Some women desperately trying to cash in again for a big payday. 

 

Always the same.

 

#metoo

22 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

More like basic biology.  A woman who has just given birth has some tells.

 

The article didn’t say newborn. It could be several months old already.

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, impulse said:

 

They were deeply wronged.  By Qatari authorities and personnel, in Qatar.

 

They deserve their day in a Qatari court.  Not an Aussie court.  But good luck with that.

 

I'd like to see them get a buttload of money in a settlement.  But not in Australia.

 

 

I'd love to see them all get a huge payout.  I wish them all good luck!

20 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

I would think that a doctor can see if a lady recently has given birth, and without knowing the details, I presume that ladies involved were pregnant.

Yes, but the article doesn’t state the age of the baby. It could be several months old already. Also, a DNA test would be much more accurate, depending on how long ago birth took place. 

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, pacovl46 said:

Yes, but the article doesn’t state the age of the baby. It could be several months old already.

 

 

6 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

This was triggered by the discovery of a newborn baby abandoned in a bathroom,

 

And the karens rejoiced!

Doubt we have got the whole story or even half of it.  But I believe they were detained and searched by the DOHA Authorities (Police) in DOHA and they are suing in a DOHA Court (in absentia) - good luck with that. 

6 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Qatar Airways like to think there the Worlds top Airline but go against them and you find out how they deal with people who say things about them. Ask Josh Cahill ( Airline Vlogger )  he has been banned from flying Qatar Airways because he posted bad service on a flight.

 

Terrible airline, tried their Q business class a couple of years ago. Paid for reserved seat was cancelled, no refund, dispute went on for weeks. Seat did not work properly, one toilet out of order and no special meal, despite being ordered weeks before. Food they did have was some of the worst I have ever been offered, Never again.

The plantiff's will should get their win and receive a lot of compensatory damages.   That's what I wish for, anything to cause pain for QR or Doha Intl airport.  They have plenty of money, after all, they paid to get selected as top airline and top airport.  Both suck and QR can keep all those avios of mine...you won't see me anymore.

I understand they sue Matar, the operator of Hamad International Airport, But I don't understand why they sue Quatar Airways. Could anybody explain

  • Popular Post
3 hours ago, sungod said:

 

#metoo

 

Let's follow your logic.  It is a criminal offence to engage in homosexual acts in Qatar. Aggressive sodomy with either another man or an object can result in rectal bleeding and irritation to the rectum. This manifests itself with some blood and mucous discharge. There can also be loose stools.  In the event that bloody discharge and mucous drippings are discovered on a toilet in the economy lav on a Qatar flight, then it is reasonable to require all male passengers to submit to a rectal search to determine if they  had recently been engaging in anal intercourse. Certainly you would not object to a strip search and having some arab man insert his fingers in your rectum to determine if you were penetrated? You would have no objections would you?

  • Popular Post
5 hours ago, pacovl46 said:

How the hell is a strip-search gonna help to identify the mother?! 

 

   Seeing if any of them had just given birth 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.