Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Maxwell Clears Trump: DOJ Considers Releasing Interview

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Virginia Giuffre was most certainly a common whore, and one year before she met Ghislaine Maxwell she was already working as a prostitute:

 

"Prince Andrew's chief accuser was a prostitute who lied about her age and was paid "half a million" by the disgraced paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, new court papers allege."

 

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, 37, who claims to have had sex with the prince three times when she was 17, was "on the game for about a year" before she met Ghislaine Maxwell, who is accused of sex trafficking her and a number of other young women in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

 

Allegations contained in newly-filed legal documents claim Ms Roberts Giuffre was 16, not 15, when she first met Ms Maxwell in Florida. She is also accused of changing her story about meeting Donald Trump at the last minute and of confusing one of the men she claimed to have been sex trafficked to with another Harvard professor. 

It is also alleged that she may have doctored an email and was using legal action as a form of "blackmail".

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/04/exclusive-prince-andrews-accuser-prostitute-paid-jeffrey-epstein/

She was a minor trafficked to adults for sex.

 

You have already established your lack of scruples in the matter.


I’m increasingly less surprised, but nevertheless disgusted, that you are eager to blame the child victim of sex abuse, while defending the pedos who abused her.

 

 

 

  • Replies 336
  • Views 10.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Quell surprise 😲 did anyone think for a moment a prisoner at the mercy of trump who holds the key to get herself freedom would say otherwise lmao 😂 I think most folks know better.

  • Good to hear it clarified once and for all.   I always knew Trump wasn't involved.   

  • In fairness, when she was around him, his umh, interests and enthusiasms, were probably directed elsewhere!

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Innocent until proven guilty Chomps.

Not in the court of public opinion where such judicial process has no meaning.

 

12 hours ago, webfact said:

image.jpeg

video screenshot

 

Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly informed Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that President Donald Trump never acted inappropriately towards her. During a nine-hour-long interview, Maxwell stated Trump’s actions were never concerning, as per sources familiar with the discussions.

 

The Trump administration is contemplating making these interview transcripts public. Multiple insiders informed us that the decision could be made this week. The interview took place over two days, and there is an audio recording of the sessions, though it remains uncertain if the transcriptions will also be released.

 

Maxwell, a key associate of the late Jeffrey Epstein, was convicted on charges related to sex trafficking and received a 20-year sentence in 2022. She recently moved to a less restrictive federal prison in Texas and is appealing her conviction at the U.S. Supreme Court. Sources suggest that Maxwell initiated the interview with the DOJ.

 

Reports indicate that she is also pursuing a pardon from Trump. David Markus, Maxwell's lawyer, publicly stated that she "would welcome any relief" and did not withhold any information when questioned about her connections.

 

Responding to queries, Trump stated that he was not aware of Maxwell's prison transfer until he read about it. He assured that the conversations between Blanche and Maxwell were "completely ethical" and upheld transparency. Trump’s comments about potentially releasing the transcripts suggest he desires openness, although he expressed concerns regarding possible unintended harm, as reported by ABC News.

 

Blanche tweeted after meeting Maxwell, stating that the DOJ would provide further insights “at the appropriate time.” CNN originally reported the possible release of these discussions.

 

Maxwell's interactions with the DOJ, along with her appeal process, keep her in the public eye. While Trump has not ruled out the possibility of pardoning Maxwell, details of the interview are still kept confidential for now. While decisions about public disclosure remain pending, the situation continues to unfold.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from ABC News 2025-08-07

 

image.png

I'm not sure that her claim that Trump never acted inappropriate to her clears him. It just indicates he never made advances to her. There are several women that have already stated in testimony the opposite but since they were not part if this inquiry they don't count do they ? We also don't know what the questions asked were 

  • Popular Post
9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

She was a minor trafficked to adults fir sex.

 

You have already established your lack of scruples in the matter.


I’m increasingly less surprised, but nevertheless disgusted, that you are eager to blame the child victim of sex abuse, while defending the pedos who abused her.

 

 

 

 

I'm disgusted that you're trying to persist in the delusion that Virginia Giuffre was anything else but a prostitute, when it is documented she worked as a prostitute one whole year before she even met  Epstein.

 

Everyone was a minor. Once. Virginia Giuffre happened to be a minor and a well worn prostitute one whole year before she even met Epstein. in addition Giuffre was a documented liar, who tampered with and falsified emails, falsified her age, and made up stories and delighted in obtaining millions of dollars from extortion based on her lies. You may want to hang  your Lancelot shield on a more worthy cause, Chomps.

 

Clearly facts mean nothing to you. I'm also a bit surprised you keep clamoring for the Epstein files to be released when you haven't even read all the files the FBI has already released. Here, go and do some light reading:

 

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

 

 

"Prince Andrew's chief accuser was a prostitute who lied about her age and was paid "half a million" by the disgraced paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, new court papers allege."

 

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, 37, who claims to have had sex with the prince three times when she was 17, was "on the game for about a year" before she met Ghislaine Maxwell, who is accused of sex trafficking her and a number of other young women in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

 

Allegations contained in newly-filed legal documents claim Ms Roberts Giuffre was 16, not 15, when she first met Ms Maxwell in Florida. She is also accused of changing her story about meeting Donald Trump at the last minute and of confusing one of the men she claimed to have been sex trafficked to with another Harvard professor. 

It is also alleged that she may have doctored an email and was using legal action as a form of "blackmail".

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/04/exclusive-prince-andrews-accuser-prostitute-paid-jeffrey-epstein/

46 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

It's freakin' public knowledge, go ahead and educate yourself:

 

"It was reported that she had come from a "troubled home" and, from the age of seven, was molested by a close family friend. She lived on the streets at age 14, Later she was abused by a sex trafficker, Ron Eppinger, in Miami. Giuffre lived with Eppinger for approximately 6 months. Eppinger reportedly ran a front business for international sex trafficking known as the modeling agency "Perfect 10". He was raided by the FBI and later pleaded guilty to charges of alien smuggling for prostitution, interstate travel for prostitution, and money laundering."

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Giuffre

 

She was a whore before she even met Epstein.

 

 

You show 1. class of emphasis for women in general, especially for those who had no chances in life to make it as normal people do. 

 

Amazing how some are stuck in their own emotions, 

All that means is either Epstein kept her out of the loop with regard to Trump, or she wasn't Trump's type. 

 

Trump is as guilty as sin, he was as perverted as they come, and we know that he liked them young because he told us so. And let us not forget he and his buddy Jeff were very close friends for nearly 20 years. 

 

Trump, his supporters and his sycophantic circle of goons in the White House are doing everything they can to deny, to distort and to suppress.

 

But, many of us know what really happened. 

 

 

IMG-20250721-WA0001.jpg

  • Popular Post
15 minutes ago, Hummin said:

 

 

You show 1. class of emphasis for women in general, especially for those who had no chances in life to make it as normal people do. 

 

 

 

I have superhuman empathy.  But don't worry! It's not required for Virginia GIuffre. She had a net worth between 3 million and 12 million pounds when she died. By how many multiples has she done better in life than you have?

 

In fact she killed herself because she feared that the bulk of her money would be lost in yet another legal action, because an artist was suing her for defamation for 7 million pounds for calling her a giirlfriend of Epstein. That appears to have been the reason of her distress, losing her money. Not losing her husband.

 

"Virginia Giuffre was 'extremely distressed' in the lead up to her death and feared she would lose millions in a court battle with another victim of Jeffrey Epstein.

Ms Giuffre was being sued by artist Rina Oh for falsely describing her as a girlfriend of Epstein and one of the convicted sex offender's recruiters.

The £7.5million lawsuit will now pass on to Ms Giuffre's estate following her death by suicide on April 25."

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14701985/Virginia-Giuffre-distressed-millions-Prince-Andrew-payout-two-weeks-suicide.html

 

Of course some might see this as yet another cat fight over the Epstein millions.

 

Honi soit qui mal y pense.

  • Popular Post
38 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I'm disgusted that you're trying to persist in the delusion that Virginia Giuffre was anything else but a prostitute, when it is documented she worked as a prostitute one whole year before she even met  Epstein.

 

Everyone was a minor. Once. Virginia Giuffre happened to be a minor and a well worn prostitute one whole year before she even met Epstein. in addition Giuffre was a documented liar, who tampered with and falsified emails, falsified her age, and made up stories and delighted in obtaining millions of dollars from extortion based on her lies. You may want to hang  your Lancelot shield on a more worthy cause, Chomps.

 

Clearly facts mean nothing to you. I'm also a bit surprised you keep clamoring for the Epstein files to be released when you haven't even read all the files the FBI has already released. Here, go and do some light reading:

 

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

 

 

"Prince Andrew's chief accuser was a prostitute who lied about her age and was paid "half a million" by the disgraced paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, new court papers allege."

 

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, 37, who claims to have had sex with the prince three times when she was 17, was "on the game for about a year" before she met Ghislaine Maxwell, who is accused of sex trafficking her and a number of other young women in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

 

Allegations contained in newly-filed legal documents claim Ms Roberts Giuffre was 16, not 15, when she first met Ms Maxwell in Florida. She is also accused of changing her story about meeting Donald Trump at the last minute and of confusing one of the men she claimed to have been sex trafficked to with another Harvard professor. 

It is also alleged that she may have doctored an email and was using legal action as a form of "blackmail".

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/04/exclusive-prince-andrews-accuser-prostitute-paid-jeffrey-epstein/

I’m not really concerned about the faux disgust of anyone defending pedos.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not really concerned about the faux disgust of anyone defending pedos.

 

Great, so we feel the same way!

8 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I have superhuman empathy.  But don't worry! It's not required for Virginia GIuffre. She had a net worth between 3 million and 12 million pounds when she died. By how many multiples has she done better in life than you have?

 

In fact she killed herself because she feared that the bulk of her money would be lost in yet another legal action, because an artist was suing her for defamation for 7 million pounds for calling her a giirlfriend of Epstein. That appears to have been the reason of her distress, losing her money. Not losing her husband.

 

"Virginia Giuffre was 'extremely distressed' in the lead up to her death and feared she would lose millions in a court battle with another victim of Jeffrey Epstein.

Ms Giuffre was being sued by artist Rina Oh for falsely describing her as a girlfriend of Epstein and one of the convicted sex offender's recruiters.

The £7.5million lawsuit will now pass on to Ms Giuffre's estate following her death by suicide on April 25."

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14701985/Virginia-Giuffre-distressed-millions-Prince-Andrew-payout-two-weeks-suicide.html

 

Of course some might see this as yet another cat fight over the Epstein millions.

 

Honi soit qui mal y pense.


 

Again, you prove my point very well. Thank you 

17 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Great, so we feel the same way!

Fortunately, I don't think anyone on this forum feels the way you do. You're damaged beyond repair.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

Virginia Giuffre was most certainly a common whore, and one year before she met Ghislaine Maxwell she was already working as a prostitute:

 

"Prince Andrew's chief accuser was a prostitute who lied about her age and was paid "half a million" by the disgraced paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, new court papers allege."

 

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, 37, who claims to have had sex with the prince three times when she was 17, was "on the game for about a year" before she met Ghislaine Maxwell, who is accused of sex trafficking her and a number of other young women in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

 

Allegations contained in newly-filed legal documents claim Ms Roberts Giuffre was 16, not 15, when she first met Ms Maxwell in Florida. She is also accused of changing her story about meeting Donald Trump at the last minute and of confusing one of the men she claimed to have been sex trafficked to with another Harvard professor. 

It is also alleged that she may have doctored an email and was using legal action as a form of "blackmail".

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/04/exclusive-prince-andrews-accuser-prostitute-paid-jeff

You are either, intellectually challenged, a mindless bot, or a contrary ass for the fun of it. Which one?

12 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

"During her nine hours speaking with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump, telling Blanche that Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said."

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-administration-considers-releasing-transcripts-doj-interview-ghislaine/story?id=124383957

really???? who's going to believe her... but/if that's the case why is Trump and his cronies doing anything and everything to avoid releasing the files including the DAG interview, how convenient it is to just say so without back up

11 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

It's a toss-up to say who's a bigger liar, her or 47.

in my rating they both came at first place

6 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Show me the proof.... all I'm hearing are the rantings of weak dem individuals.

Trump campaigned on that he would be releasing the files, why did he back up or did a U turn

18 minutes ago, DarthChuckler said:

You are either, intellectually challenged, a mindless bot, or a contrary ass for the fun of it. Which one?

All of them IMO!

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

Maxwell never "forced" anyone to have sex with Epstein. All they had to do was to promise money and other material enticements and all the girls consented with almost no exceptions. Physical force was never used.

 

There is no "client" list, because Epstein didn't have "clients", he wasn't running a sex trafficking operation for others, but for himself alone. Much like Diddy's freak-offs were for him alone, and his parties were totally different affairs. There is no evidence Epstein ever used extortion on anyone, which would have been non-sensical to start with as he had millions of dollars amassed already.

 

The rumour that Epstein filmed sexual encounters to blackmail people was started by Sara Ransome, who later admited that she just made it up.

 

 

 

Oh goodie, yet another MAGA cult member trying to defend the indefensible. What a shocker. Sigh.

 

Okay, let's delve into this, shall we?

 

"Maxwell never "forced" anyone to have sex with Epstein."

 

Maybe you should brush up on your reading skills, because that's not what I said. I said that the girls were forced to have sex with clients of Maxwell and Epstein.

 

"Maxwell never "forced" anyone to have sex with Epstein. All they had to do was to promise money and other material enticements and all the girls consented with almost no exceptions. Physical force was never used."

 

That's a rather bold claim, to say the least. How exactly do you know that (physical) force was never used? Do you have any proof/evidence for that claim? If so, please share it with us. Or were you there? Were you present just before or during every single sexual encounter that Maxwell and/or Epstein facilitated, and you personally witnessed that no force was used?

 

"All they had to do was to promise money and other material enticements and all the girls consented with almost no exceptions."

 

So it's all A-okay if underage girls are promised money or other enticements and then consent to have sex with (much) older guys, is it? That's strange, because last time I checked it's still illegal to have sex with underage girls, even if they do 'consent'. I believe it's called statutory rape.

 

And given your weird definition of consent, you'd be totally okay with your 14-15-16-year-old daughter having sex with a 50-year-old guy in exchange for money or whatever, right? 

 

Not to put too fine a point on it, but do you think it's a fair and level playing field if some rich and powerful older guy offers a 14-15-year-old girl money or promises her whatever? You don't see anything wrong with that? 

 

"There is no "client" list, because Epstein didn't have "clients", he wasn't running a sex trafficking operation for others, but for himself alone."

 

Wow, if you really believe that, you must also still believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. So all those rich guys went to Epstein's island (some of them many times) just to get a good tan and play some cards? What did the underage girls do on the island when those rich guys were there? They probably just serve drinks, right?

 

And if there is no client list, why did Pam Bondi say in February that it was right in front of her, on her desk?

 

Epstein was a clever guy. He probably knew very well that what he was doing was not only wrong, but also illegal, and that it could land him in jail. So of course he made sure he had 'the goods' on everyone who used his 'services', as insurance, just in case someone later started to feel remorse and was tempted to go to the police.

 

By the way, Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted (among many other things) of sex trafficking. That usually involves some kind of coersion, pressure or force. So the very concept of consent goes out the window right away when sex trafficking is involved.

 

What I see on your part is a pathetic attempt to defend and protect your dear leader, at all cost. Just like all those other despicable MAGA zealots who had been screaming for years for the release of the Epstein files and the client list, but have now done a complete 180 because Trump is (or may be) implicated. Typical cult behavior, no matter how you slice it.

 

 

 

 

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

I said that the girls were forced to have sex with clients of Maxwell and Epstein.

 

Just one tiny problem with that theory....Epstein didn't have "clients".

 

I mean try to engage your brain for two seconds, this man was not a two-bit pimp trafficking prostitutes like Ron Eppinger, the man Virginia Giuffre slept with at age 15 prior to meeting Epstein. This was a man worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The last thing he needed was clients for his prostitutes, he wanted to use them for himself.

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

hat's a rather bold claim, to say the least. How exactly do you know that (physical) force was never used? Do you have any proof/evidence for that claim? If so, please share it with us.

 

Well, when all the "survivors" accounts converge in this regard, it's kind of public knowledge. Epstein entered, removed his robe, asked for a massage and they let him have sex. There was no physical violence whatsoever, not one "survivor" alleges it. And you only have to engage your brain, do you think if they had all been beaten with a stick to have sex they would have remained for years and taken Epstein's money in exchange for sex? Virginia Giuffre made half a million Dollars by letting Epstein have sex with her.

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

So it's all A-okay if underage girls are promised money or other enticements and then consent to have sex with (much) older guys, is it? That's strange, because last time I checked it's still illegal to have sex with underage girls, even if they do 'consent'. I believe it's called statutory rape.

 

I'm not opining on whether it's "A-okay" or not, I'm merely stating what actually happened, as opposed to spouting claims the girls were "forced". They weren't. They were persuaded. Not that former prostitutes like Giuffre needed persuasion. 

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

So all those rich guys went to Epstein's island (some of them many times) just to get a good tan and play some cards?

 

Well, we'll have to wait for Ghislaine's Maxwell testimony on what happened there, unless you have inside information or evidence? In the absence of such, one shouldn't make accusations. Rich people fly to private islands. Johnny Depp has a private islands, and he no doubt brought friends there. Doesn't mean they had orgies.

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

And if there is no client list, why did Pam Bondi say in February that it was right in front of her, on her desk?

 

She didn't. You're doing with her what you're doing with me, putting words in my mouth. Pam Bondi was saying the Epstein file was on her desk. That's what she meant anyway, she clarified it publicly.

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

So of course he made sure he had 'the goods' on everyone who used his 'services', as insurance, just in case someone later started to feel remorse and was tempted to go to the police.

 

Again, an entertaining fantasy, sadly you have provided zero evidence for this fantasy.

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

By the way, Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted (among many other things) of sex trafficking. That usually involves some kind of coersion, pressure or force. So the very concept of consent goes out the window right away when sex trafficking is involved.

 

You're clearly not au fait with the law. Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking because her activities involved commercial activity with a minor, which means it's not just consent that's irrelevant, but also force, fraud or coercion. Those don't apply if the victim was a minor, ie they are not required. Had they been required Maxwell most likely would not have been convicted, because she used neither force, nor fraud nor coercion.

 

46 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

What I see on your part is a pathetic attempt to defend and protect your dear leader, at all cost. Just like all those other despicable MAGA zealots who had been screaming for years for the release of the Epstein files and the client list, but have now done a complete 180 because Trump is (or may be) implicated. Typical cult behavior, no matter how you slice it.

 

Lol, you loony leftiers can bang your Trump-so pedophile drum as much as you want, nobody believes your nonsense, apart from your fellow leftie lunatics. The fact is the main witness has just totally exonerated Donald Trump and confirmed he always acted with utmost propriety in her presence.

 

I know this will be a great disappointment and you'll continue spouting the lies you've been spinning about Trump for years, but sad to say, the evidence in the real world does not support your fairytales.

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings, or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

20 hours ago, webfact said:

Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly informed Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that President Donald Trump never acted inappropriately towards her.

 

Good answer. Pardon granted. 

It's not the DOJ Department of Justice anymore.

It's the department of DOJ donald JOHN trump.

Banana republic city.

The greatest con man who's ever lived has dragged the USA to the lowest depths.

Americans will paying for the mistake of bringing him back to power forever.

On 8/7/2025 at 6:19 AM, Tug said:

Quell surprise 😲 did anyone think for a moment a prisoner at the mercy of trump who holds the key to get herself freedom would say otherwise lmao 😂 I think most folks know better.

So in your eyes, even though she testifies Trump was not doing bad like other men. You still twist it into something bad for Trump. Let's wait and see if the facts come out about Obama and his visits on the island to be with little boys. Or that Prince in the EU who has been trying to get his name silenced in reports as well. It would not surprise me if other top government democrats had their fun on Epsteins island as well. 

 

Don't know much about her but she seems like a decent woman.

  • Popular Post
21 minutes ago, thesetat said:

So in your eyes, even though she testifies Trump was not doing bad like other men. You still twist it into something bad for Trump.

Per the ABCNews report linked page 1:

 

During her nine hours speaking with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump, telling Blanche that Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said.

 

(my emphasis)

 

 

40 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Per the ABCNews report linked page 1:

 

During her nine hours speaking with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump, telling Blanche that Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said.

 

(my emphasis)

 

 

Given what she has done in the past, I doubt sex abuse of children would cause her any concern.  A truly appalling woman - evil.  This is why she is in prison

59 minutes ago, Woke to Sounds said:

Don't know much about her but she seems like a decent woman.

The record of her crimes and trial is available, you should look it up.

1 hour ago, thesetat said:

So in your eyes, even though she testifies Trump was not doing bad like other men

That's not what she said.

 

The rest of your post are the usual deflections.

So Trump is exonerated by key witness and lefties squirm and squirm in their unsubstantiated slimey stew of allegations without evidence.

 

Enjoy.

REDUX:

 

Posted yesterday at 08:29 AM

JerryMahoney

 

Seems to me both attorneys Blanche and Markus have chosen their words very carefully.

4 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

REDUX:

 

Posted yesterday at 08:29 AM

JerryMahoney

 

Seems to me both attorneys Blanche and Markus have chosen their words very carefully.

 

Attorneys always do of course. But what people then choose to interpret into the words needs to have a semblance of real world evidence to back it up.

 

For instance if Ghislaine Maxwell says "he never did anything  in my presence that would cause me concern" and you jump and say "Ah but this proves he took little kids behind closed doors and had his wicked way with them", then really you need to have real world evidence to substantiate that claim.

 

Otherwise you're just in a vacuum of hot air, much like people who claim Hitler is still alive drinking hot chocolate in Buenos Aires.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.