September 14, 2025Sep 14 100 Epstein emails may ‘destroy’ Prince Andrew Prince Andrew faces renewed scrutiny as US investigators review a cache of more than 100 secret emails between the Duke of York and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. According to senior sources, the correspondence—part of hundreds of thousands of documents now under Congressional examination—could prove “embarrassing and incriminating,” with one insider warning: “He could be destroyed.” The revelations come just days after the release of damning Epstein emails forced the resignation of Lord Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to Washington. Mandelson, who referred to Epstein as “Petie” in messages, appeared to encourage him to contest his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor. Now, attention has shifted squarely to Andrew. David Boies, the lawyer who represented Virginia Giuffre—who accused the prince of sexual abuse while under Epstein’s control—has said the material may justify a criminal investigation. Andrew has always denied Giuffre’s claims. In 2022, he paid a reported £12 million to settle her lawsuit without admitting liability. Giuffre died earlier this year in what authorities ruled a suicide. Some of Andrew’s past correspondence with Epstein has already surfaced in legal filings, including a 2011 email in which the prince allegedly wrote: “Keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon!!” That message appeared in documents connected to a case against Jes Staley, Epstein’s former banker. With the pending release of these new emails, pressure is mounting on the Duke of York. Allies fear the fallout could be far worse than previous scandals, raising questions about his future role within the royal family and whether investigators will pursue further legal action. Key Takeaways: Over 100 Epstein emails involving Prince Andrew could soon be made public. Lawyers suggest the cache may support a criminal investigation. Andrew has denied all allegations but settled Giuffre’s civil suit in 2022. Source: Daily Mail
Create an account or sign in to comment