Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

“We Need Greenland”: Trump Renews Annexation Threat

Featured Replies

screenshot_3541.jpg

video screenshot

Donald Trump has reignited his proposal to annex Greenland, drawing firm opposition from Danish leaders. Speaking to the press, Trump asserted the US "needs Greenland from a national security standpoint," highlighting its strategic location and mineral resources. Mette Frederiksen, Denmark's Prime Minister, firmly dismissed the idea, calling it a "fantasy" and emphasising that NATO's security guarantee protects Greenland.

Greenland, a semiautonomous Danish territory, has been at the centre of Trump's remarks, which have previously caused diplomatic tensions. The situation escalated after a social media post by Katie Miller, wife of former Trump aide Stephen Miller, showed Greenland overlaid with the American flag, captioned “SOON.” This event prompted a swift rebuke from Danish officials, who stressed the importance of respecting territorial integrity.

In recent developments, the US's actions in Venezuela, where its forces ousted President Nicolás Maduro, have heightened concerns about Trump's intentions in Greenland. The appointment of a special envoy to Greenland by the Trump administration has further strained relations with Denmark, wary of potential US influence in the region.

Experts warn that annexation would disrupt international law and diplomatic relations. Greenland's population of 57,000, which enjoys self-governance, shows strong opposition to becoming part of the US. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer reiterated that decisions about Greenland's future rest solely with Denmark and Greenland itself.

Looking forward, tensions are likely to persist, with both Denmark and the EU rejecting Trump's claims that European nations desire US control over Greenland. Paula Pinho, the spokesperson for the European Commission, confirmed that there were no planned discussions with the US on the issue, highlighting the EU's non-involvement in this matter.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump repeats his call to annex Greenland, citing security and resources.

  • Denmark and Greenland leaders reject the proposal as unrealistic.

  • The EU and UK leadership affirm that territorial decisions lie with Denmark and Greenland.

Related Stories:

Hands Off Greenland! Danish PM Blasts Trump Threats

US “Has to Have” Greenland for National Protection, Trump Says

image.png  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2026-01-06

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Replies 61
  • Views 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • DonniePeverley
    DonniePeverley

    Then what if China needs Taiwan? What if Russia then needs Turkmenistan and Uzebekistan all other old soviet states? What if North Korea wants South Korea? What if China wants Japan and Australia ?

  • JBChiangRai
    JBChiangRai

    America didn't need Greenland under Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter or Ford. It doesn't need Greenland now.

  • JBChiangRai
    JBChiangRai

    Economic Security. With Trump it's always about money. He is not averse to stealing it. If he annexes Greenland by force, it will be horrendous.

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

Then what if China needs Taiwan?

What if Russia then needs Turkmenistan and Uzebekistan all other old soviet states?

What if North Korea wants South Korea?

What if China wants Japan and Australia ?

What if India wants Bangladesh, and Nepal ?

You simply have no moral control anymore. A true idiot.

  • Popular Post

America didn't need Greenland under Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter or Ford.

It doesn't need Greenland now.

  • Popular Post

Security from whom?? Surely not his Russian lover...

  • Popular Post
14 minutes ago, JohnOFphon said:

Security from whom?? Surely not his Russian lover...

Economic Security.

With Trump it's always about money. He is not averse to stealing it.

If he annexes Greenland by force, it will be horrendous.

3 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

Then what if China needs Taiwan?

What if Russia then needs Turkmenistan and Uzebekistan all other old soviet states?

What if North Korea wants South Korea?

What if China wants Japan and Australia ?

What if India wants Bangladesh, and Nepal ?

You simply have no moral control anymore. A true idiot.

Yep, it greenlights the axis to do their thing. But I reckon Trump will go ahead anyway. It is not so much fantasy as the Danish PM thinks. He doesn’t care and wants those minerals. It is there for the taking.

  • Popular Post

What Trump needs is a good solid smackdown from an adult.

  • Popular Post
15 hours ago, daveAustin said:

Yep, it greenlights the axis to do their thing. But I reckon Trump will go ahead anyway. It is not so much fantasy as the Danish PM thinks. He doesn’t care and wants those minerals. It is there for the taking.

If he takes Greenland, then he has no moral authority to stop Russia or China taking over territories they want.

Infact it would be a free for all at this point.

Surely that is not lost on him ?

  • Popular Post
15 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

Economic Security.

With Trump it's always about money. He is not averse to stealing it.

If he annexes Greenland by force, it will be horrendous.

How does Greenland provide security ?

  • Popular Post
11 hours ago, Emdog said:

What Trump needs is a good solid smackdown from an adult.

Smacking children is illegal in most countries

Denmark will defend Greenland against the US with help of its Nato allies. Wait a minute, that doesn't compute.

Let's see then, how about a security alliance with Russia? Russian S-500 AA missiles to defend the skies and nuclear submarines to keep US gun boats at bay. Dang, that won't work either. Because Denmark is a vassal state and the US won't allow a defensive alliance with Russia.

So Denmark is f*****, Greenland is gone. But what will really be funny is watching Europeans twist into pretzels spinning the takeover as legal and helpful and welcoming the US as a friend who has actually come closer to Europe in nautical miles. But the real enemy, Russia.

7 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

How does Greenland provide security ?

23 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

Economic Security.

I said Economic Security...

Key Natural Resources in Greenland

  • Rare Earth Elements (REEs): Greenland is estimated to hold 36.1 billion tonnes of rare earths, vital for high‑tech industries (wind turbines, electric cars, drones, fighter jets, electronics).

  • Minerals: Deposits include iron ore, zinc, lead, gold, uranium, and gemstones. These are of growing interest as global demand rises.

  • Hydrocarbons: Offshore areas are believed to contain oil and gas reserves, though exploration has been limited and global interest has cooled due to high costs and climate concerns.

  • Freshwater: Greenland’s ice sheet represents one of the world’s largest freshwater reserves, increasingly seen as a strategic resource.

  • Renewable Energy Potential: Abundant hydropower opportunities exist thanks to glacial meltwater and rivers, offering clean energy prospects.

14 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

I said Economic Security...

Key Natural Resources in Greenland

  • Rare Earth Elements (REEs): Greenland is estimated to hold 36.1 billion tonnes of rare earths, vital for high‑tech industries (wind turbines, electric cars, drones, fighter jets, electronics).

  • Minerals: Deposits include iron ore, zinc, lead, gold, uranium, and gemstones. These are of growing interest as global demand rises.

  • Hydrocarbons: Offshore areas are believed to contain oil and gas reserves, though exploration has been limited and global interest has cooled due to high costs and climate concerns.

  • Freshwater: Greenland’s ice sheet represents one of the world’s largest freshwater reserves, increasingly seen as a strategic resource.

  • Renewable Energy Potential: Abundant hydropower opportunities exist thanks to glacial meltwater and rivers, offering clean energy prospects.

So then trade ?

America needs oil ... and it's installed regimes around the world to make sure they get their resources. What's the deal with 'invasion' ?

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, DonniePeverley said:

So then trade ?

America needs oil ... and it's installed regimes around the world to make sure they get their resources. What's the deal with 'invasion' ?

Trump believes might is right. IMHO he lacks a moral compass and believes the end justifies the means. If he wants something and can overpower the owner, then he will do that.

The issue for Americans is whether they want to live in a world where America repeats what Nazi Germany did and invade and take over other countries?

  • Popular Post
7 hours ago, Autocan said:

Denmark will defend Greenland against the US with help of its Nato allies. Wait a minute, that doesn't compute.

Let's see then, how about a security alliance with Russia? Russian S-500 AA missiles to defend the skies and nuclear submarines to keep US gun boats at bay. Dang, that won't work either. Because Denmark is a vassal state and the US won't allow a defensive alliance with Russia.

So Denmark is fu*ked, Greenland is gone. But what will really be funny is watching Europeans twist into pretzels spinning the takeover as legal and helpful and welcoming the US as a friend who has actually come closer to Europe in nautical miles. But the real enemy, Russia.

Denmark is a member of Nato. It's no different to the US keeping Alaska as their territory when it makes little geographical sense as it's a seperate state crossed by Canada.

If Greenland is gone then so is Nato, and the natural world order that in most accounts has kept the world free of war.

What is the point of that ? You will then see countries like Germany, Japan, and many more all have to heavily armour up, knowing they cannot rely on Nato or the Americans anymore.

It will embolden Russia to smash up Ukraine and take more Soviet States.

Germany and Japan will have to go full capacity to get nuclear weapons.

  • Popular Post
8 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

If he takes Greenland, then he has no moral authority to stop Russia or China taking over territories they want

He lost that moral authority already.

  • Popular Post

Just more posturing to distract from the "Epstein problem".

1 minute ago, JBChiangRai said:

3 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

Trump believes might is right. IMHO he lacks a moral compass and believes the end justifies the means. If he wants something and can overpower the owner, then he will do that.

The issue for Americans is whether they want to live in a world where America repeats what Nazi Germany did and invade and take over other countries?

But this is not a real estate. It doesn't matter how much power you have there are major powers with Nuclear weapons that can pretty much cause mutual destruction- what would be the point of that>?

  • Popular Post
2 minutes ago, Mutt Daeng said:

Just more posturing to distract from the "Epstein problem".

Most likely.

  • Popular Post

As JD Vance would say, "I came, I saw, I ran back to mommy."

The Greenlanders completely snubbed him the last time he went. That's their answer.

We here in Oz are going send in Kevin 07 to kidnap trumpy and keep the us for ourselves.

1 minute ago, DonniePeverley said:

But they can't do what Nazi Germany did ... with nuclear weapons around if they push too much then you have mutual destruction.

Greenland may seem like a small miniscule issue, but the US has lost all moral authority now.

But this is not a real estate. It doesn't matter how much power you have there are major powers with Nuclear weapons that can pretty much cause mutual destruction- what would be the point of that>?

Territory

Spheres of influence

  • Trump over Latin America

  • Xi over Asia

  • Putin over Europe

Nobody is going to use Nuclear Weapons, Putin won't attempt to take Europe, he will just bully knowing Trump will give him a pass and Europe will negotiate with Putin whilst arming itself to the teeth. Europe without NATO won't stop Putin taking back Soviet states.

The real question is whether Americans will allow this to happen?

1 world, 3 dictators of superpowers.

4 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

Territory

  • Trump gets Canada & Greenland (NATO is gone)

  • Putin gets Ukraine and its former Soviet countries (agreed swap for Venzuela) Vladimir Putin’s secret bargain to trade Ukraine for Venezuela

  • Xi gets Taiwan

Spheres of influence

  • Trump over Latin America

  • Xi over Asia

  • Putin over Europe

Nobody is going to use Nuclear Weapons, Putin won't attempt to take Europe, he will just bully knowing Trump will give him a pass and Europe will negotiate with Putin whilst arming itself to the teeth. Europe without NATO won't stop Putin taking back Soviet states.

The real question is whether Americans will allow this to happen?

1 world, 3 dictators of superpowers.

Scary but realistic.

Does Mexico need the USA, and/or reclaim the land that the USA stole from Mexico?

I doubt if anyone in Canada wants the USA, apart from Alaska possible.

1 minute ago, JimHuaHin said:

Does Mexico need the USA, and/or reclaim the land that the USA stole from Mexico?

I doubt if anyone in Canada wants the USA, apart from Alaska possible.

Trump will influence Mexico (it's a polite word for bully)

Trump doesn't care what anyone in Canada or Greenland thinks, this is a landgrab for the natural resources and to go from superpower to megapower.

European leaders will not stop fighting for Greenland amid threats from Trump a European spokesman said.

War is caused by leaders making mistakes.

The UK has a history of picking fights when it's morally outraged.

U.S. Security Cooperation with Denmark - United States Department of State

The security of Greenland, a part of Denmark, is already covered by agreements dating back to 1950. Within that cooperation and under the auspices of NATO the US can build bases and station troops. The very existence of these agreements shows that the claim Greenland is necessary for US security is false, no surprise there then.

However, it is quite clear that Greenland may be necessary for the 'financial' security of the US.........or its oligarchs.

10 hours ago, still kicking said:

Smacking children is illegal in most countries

at age 79, Trump would qualify as an adult, regardless of how infantile he acts

  • Popular Post

I dont know if americans understand how umpopular present administration has made them and their country in the rest of "democratic world". Witch is quite an achievement taking time into consideration. I remember the vietnam period, but this is worse, deeper.

Guess its because we finally see so many americans have proved a total absense of care for morals, etics, law and dignity by electing this draftdogding, corrupt, cheating thief and liar as their " best man"...

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.