Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

US “Has to Have” Greenland for National Protection, Trump Says

Featured Replies

image.jpeg

Nuuk, Greenland. Picture courtesy of Wikipedia

 

US President Donald Trump has reignited tensions with Denmark by appointing Jeff Landry as the special envoy to Greenland, a move that suggests continued interest in annexing the Arctic territory. Landry, the Republican governor of Louisiana, expressed that his role would help make Greenland part of the US. Both Denmark and Greenland have responded negatively to this decision, prompting Denmark to summon the US ambassador for clarification.

 

Trump's renewed focus on Greenland, citing its strategic and mineral significance, has sparked this development. While Greenland is semi-autonomous, it remains part of Denmark, retaining control over defence and foreign policy. The idea of US annexation has encountered fierce resistance, with Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen asserting the island’s right to self-determination, stating, “Greenland belongs to Greenlanders, and territorial integrity must be respected.”

 

Asked by the BBC about the appointment of Jeff Landry, the Republican governor of Louisiana, Trump said the US needed Greenland for “national protection,” adding that “we have to have it.” He said Landry would “lead the charge” in his new role as special envoy to Greenland, a semi-autonomous region within the Kingdom of Denmark.

 

The appointment stirred reactions on both sides of the Atlantic. Denmark's Foreign Minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, denounced the move as troubling and urged respect for their constitutional sovereignty. Meanwhile, the EU has expressed support for Denmark and Greenland, highlighting the island’s autonomy. Despite this, Trump insists that Greenland is crucial for US security interests, continuing his administration's previous ambitions to exert influence over the region.

 

Looking forward, the US administration seems poised to maintain its assertive stance on Greenland, despite international concerns. Greenland's strategic position in the Arctic makes it pivotal to US and NATO interests, which could further escalate diplomatic tensions. This situation mirrors Trump's previous attempts to buy Greenland in 2019, which both Denmark and Greenland firmly rejected.

 

Landry, a seasoned politician and military veteran, previously expressed his enthusiasm for Greenland joining the US, reinforcing Trump’s aspirations. However, experts argue that this unconventional diplomatic move may further strain US-Danish relations, as Greenland remains steadfast in its pursuit of independence.

 

 

Key Takeaways:

  • Trump appoints Landry as special envoy, intending to influence Greenland.
  • Denmark and Greenland strongly oppose US moves, defending sovereignty.
  • US views Greenland as central to strategic interests in the Arctic.

 

Related stories:

Trump's call with Danish PM sparks alarm & International Tension

Trump at Congress Revives Greenland Purchase, Promises Wealth and Security

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-12-23

 

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Replies 55
  • Views 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • A typical and farcical move from the idiot President.   What a pain Trump is ! The sooner the USA can legally rid the Nation of the curse of Trump, the better for the whole World.  

  • cjinchiangrai
    cjinchiangrai

    Trump is trying to share territory with Russia, Putin gets Ukraine and Trump gets Greenland, Putin gets Poland and Trump gets Venezuela. The rightful citizens are not a consideration for these two pre

  • "Envoy" has no practical diplomatic meaning. If Landry is not in Greenland, he can't do any influencing. But apparently the Governor thinks he can continue to be the Governor of Louisiana, which I bel

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

"Envoy" has no practical diplomatic meaning. If Landry is not in Greenland, he can't do any influencing. But apparently the Governor thinks he can continue to be the Governor of Louisiana, which I believe is facing significant criminality, health issues and social deprivation, and conduct some sort of job at the same time in the Arctic Circles.

 

The Louisiana Purchase is about 828,000 sq miles and Greenland is 836,000 sq miles. An equitable settlement would be a land swap; Greenlanders can move to the former US territories of Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, South Dakota (there are some other states that are partially Louisiana Purchase). Residents of those former US states can take over the abandoned whaling factories, uranium processing facilities and igloos of US Greenland.

  • Popular Post

A typical and farcical move from the idiot President.

 

What a pain Trump is ! The sooner the USA can legally rid the Nation of the curse of Trump, the better for the whole World.

 

Farcical !

Depends who has better social security I guess 

Apparently you can get the old age pension at 62 in America vs Denmark at 67

  • Popular Post

The Danes sold the Virgin Islands to America in 1917, formerly called the Danish West Indies.

 

Denmark got shrunken in the 1860's when the Prussians nicked half their territory, later becoming part of modern Germany. I believe that about this time they offered Greenland to the US but they declined. In fact the whole story of the German unification process involved so many land deals, it makes Trump look like an amateur.

 

Florida was acquired as debt relief to Spain. Louisiana was bought from France, Alaska from the Russians.

 

Throughout history, land and countries have been bought sold and traded between many Crowns and governments. It's just that in our living memory it has never been done, so it sounds kinda strange. The closest thing to a land deal that we all understand is the relinquishment of Hong Kong back to China - an example of how not to negotiate a lease agreement and Maggie's biggest mistake.

 

The <removed> effect tends to decide on which side of the debate you favour. Historically. Greenland acquisition has come up for discussion at least three times. I wonder how crazy an idea it would be if Barry Obama had suggested it. :coffee1:

 

 

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, georgegeorgia said:

Depends who has better social security I guess 

Apparently you can get the old age pension at 62 in America vs Denmark at 67

Why are there people still working in their 80's in the USA?

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, Gsxrnz said:

The Danes sold the Virgin Islands to America in 1917, formerly called the Danish West Indies.

 

Denmark got shrunken in the 1860's when the Prussians nicked half their territory, later becoming part of modern Germany. I believe that about this time they offered Greenland to the US but they declined. In fact the whole story of the German unification process involved so many land deals, it makes Trump look like an amateur.

 

Florida was acquired as debt relief to Spain. Louisiana was bought from France, Alaska from the Russians.

 

Throughout history, land and countries have been bought sold and traded between many Crowns and governments. It's just that in our living memory it has never been done, so it sounds kinda strange. The closest thing to a land deal that we all understand is the relinquishment of Hong Kong back to China - an example of how not to negotiate a lease agreement and Maggie's biggest mistake.

 

The Totally Dissolved Solids syndrome effect tends to decide on which side of the debate you favour. Historically. Greenland acquisition has come up for discussion at least three times. I wonder how crazy an idea it would be if Barry Obama had suggested it. :coffee1:

 

 

Trump is trying to share territory with Russia, Putin gets Ukraine and Trump gets Greenland, Putin gets Poland and Trump gets Venezuela. The rightful citizens are not a consideration for these two predators..

  • Popular Post

They should do a Trump and slap 1000% tariffs on the USA.

  • Popular Post

And here's the Greenland BS again... :coffee1:

  • Popular Post

If Trump succeeds in annexing Greenland by cutting a deal with Denmark, he will go down in history as a super-POTUS.

There is nothing my fellow Americans love more than a land-grabber on a grand scale.

  • Popular Post

Trump doing Greenland a favor they can be a new state like Hawaii

 

 

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Why are there people still working in their 80's in the USA?

Probably because you can live on the State Pension in Denmark and Greenland, and receive healthcare, whereas in the USA...

  • Popular Post
7 hours ago, Gsxrnz said:

The Danes sold the Virgin Islands to America in 1917, formerly called the Danish West Indies.

 

Denmark got shrunken in the 1860's when the Prussians nicked half their territory, later becoming part of modern Germany. I believe that about this time they offered Greenland to the US but they declined. In fact the whole story of the German unification process involved so many land deals, it makes Trump look like an amateur.

 

Florida was acquired as debt relief to Spain. Louisiana was bought from France, Alaska from the Russians.

 

Throughout history, land and countries have been bought sold and traded between many Crowns and governments. It's just that in our living memory it has never been done, so it sounds kinda strange. The closest thing to a land deal that we all understand is the relinquishment of Hong Kong back to China - an example of how not to negotiate a lease agreement and Maggie's biggest mistake.

 

The <removed> effect tends to decide on which side of the debate you favour. Historically. Greenland acquisition has come up for discussion at least three times. I wonder how crazy an idea it would be if Barry Obama had suggested it. :coffee1:

 

 

As diversions go, that's got to be some of the lamest drivel I've read in ages. Congrats!:thumbsup:

  • Popular Post

Facts matter.

 

 

 

 

  • Popular Post
12 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Facts matter.

 

 

 

 

Trump making himself ridiculous again! :laugh:

  • Popular Post

More “pearl clutching” by the usual suspects.

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, EastBayRay said:

Trump doing Greenland a favor they can be a new state like Hawaii

 

 

So true.

All they need is palm trees... and Trump will probably supply those soon enough.

It's not totally inconceivable that he will annex Greenland.

The audacity of this man is mind-boggling.

  • Popular Post
45 minutes ago, CMHomeboy78 said:

So true.

All they need is palm trees... and Trump will probably supply those soon enough.

It's not totally inconceivable that he will annex Greenland.

The audacity of this man is mind-boggling.

Anything and everything to distract from the Epstein files falllout. I wouldn't be surprised that he will soon pull out another stunt about invading Panama. We are dealing with a demented man who has no control over thinking logically. 

  • Popular Post

 This. 👇

 

 

image.png.2bfa6e31148db19da6de4bbc7c7bead5.png

  • Popular Post

It is obvious Trump wants out of Nato, therefor he needs Greenland. If he intended to stay in Nato, no need to annex Greenland, because we already allies who trust each other. 

 

So this means war against Europe

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, Hummin said:

It is obvious Trump wants out of Nato, therefor he needs Greenland. If he intended to stay in Nato, no need to annex Greenland, because we already allies who trust each other. 

 

So this means war against Europe

He wants to kill Nato too.

Just like Putin.

28 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

He wants to kill Nato too.

Just like Putin.

It guess for Trump and maga it makes more sense to be allied with North Korea, Russia and China. But my best guess, all of them despise Trump as well. 

45 minutes ago, Hummin said:

It guess for Trump and maga it makes more sense to be allied with North Korea, Russia and China. But my best guess, all of them despise Trump as well. 

They "like" him when he caves to them. 

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

They "like" him when he caves to them. 

Off course, and he want to be like them, absolute power

7 hours ago, EastBayRay said:

Trump doing Greenland a favor they can be a new state like Hawaii

 

 

Except if you went sun bathing on the beach in Greenland this time of year, you'd be there until the Summer thaw.

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

He wants to kill Nato too.

Just like Putin.


If they pay their share, it’s all good.

  • Popular Post

As ever - follow the money.

 

The US is in financial trouble, the national debt is now colossal, domestic taxation cannot service the debt and provide the level of spending that they want and need. Tariffs are a busted flush. Cutting back, particularly on defence is politically unthinkable. Infrastructure is in trouble and more and more money is needed.

 

Greenland has huge potential mineral wealth - new technologies will both increase demand for those resources, and make it more practical to exploit them. Canada also has these resources, along with timber, energy and water - there is a growing problem of shortage of water for agriculture in the U.S. States adjacent to western Canada. Venezuela has massive oil and gas resources. All three countries are nearby. All three countries are unable to compete, in conventional military terms with the USA.

 

These resources, control and exploitation of them, will go a long way towards financing and paying down that debt; and of course make those enterprises exploiting them very profitable. Taking and exploiting those resources is a medium term fix to the financial state that the US finds itself in.

 

Now I doubt that Trump himself thought that up - but the potential for personal aggrandisement - the President who created the new American Empire - would be enough to get him onside. The people, institutions and corporations who influence/advise are likely behind it. Traditional alliances, Europe and NATO are of no matter and can be discarded.

 

Welcome to the brave new world of the American Western Hemisphere, a transactional empire like no other, backed by a massive military; follow the money!

On 12/23/2025 at 6:42 AM, Gsxrnz said:

The Danes sold the Virgin Islands to America in 1917, formerly called the Danish West Indies.

 

Denmark got shrunken in the 1860's when the Prussians nicked half their territory, later becoming part of modern Germany. I believe that about this time they offered Greenland to the US but they declined. In fact the whole story of the German unification process involved so many land deals, it makes Trump look like an amateur.

 

Florida was acquired as debt relief to Spain. Louisiana was bought from France, Alaska from the Russians.

 

Throughout history, land and countries have been bought sold and traded between many Crowns and governments. It's just that in our living memory it has never been done, so it sounds kinda strange. The closest thing to a land deal that we all understand is the relinquishment of Hong Kong back to China - an example of how not to negotiate a lease agreement and Maggie's biggest mistake.

 

The <removed> effect tends to decide on which side of the debate you favour. Historically. Greenland acquisition has come up for discussion at least three times. I wonder how crazy an idea it would be if Barry Obama had suggested it. :coffee1:

 

 

Its not about the great u s of a, its about what the Greenlanders want that matters, durghhh!

On 12/23/2025 at 6:01 AM, georgegeorgia said:

Depends who has better social security I guess 

Apparently you can get the old age pension at 62 in America vs Denmark at 67

I bet social security is much better in Denmark than anything the u s of a can concoct.

On 12/23/2025 at 6:42 AM, Gsxrnz said:

Throughout history, land and countries have been bought sold and traded between many Crowns and governments. It's just that in our living memory it has never been done, so it sounds kinda strange. The closest thing to a land deal that we all understand is the relinquishment of Hong Kong back to China - an example of how not to negotiate a lease agreement and Maggie's biggest mistake.

The HK example is quite strange as the only lease in existence relating to this was the New Territories 99 year lease which covered land to the north of Boundary Street in 1898.  The Kowloon Peninsula was permanently ceded to Britain in 1860 under the Convention of Peking after the 2nd Opium War.  Hong Kong Island was ceded in perpetuity in the Treaty of Nanking of 1842 where the Qing Government agreed for it to become a Crown Colony; this was after the British Victory in the First Opium War.

None of the three 'entities' could survive the loss of one other and, as the land owner decided not to renew the lease, there was little Maggie could do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.