We seem to agree that a stronger punishment is more of a deterrent than a weaker punishment, is that correct? And if that is correct, the only question is whether or not death is a stronger punishment than prison, is this also correct? Because if a stronger punishment is more of a deterrent than a weaker punishment, and if death is a stronger punishment than prison, then it follows that death is a stronger deterrent than prison, is this not correct as well? Virtually everyone on death row is fighting to stay alive in prison. In the United States: Almost half of murders are not prosecuted Less than 1% of convicted murderers receive the death penalty Less than 1 out of 5 convicted murderers that death penalty is actually executed So, if my math is correct, if you murder someone in the US, you have less than a 1 in 1,000 chance of being executed for it. How will any "study" show this to be effective? In any event, as I have said all along, I am against the death penalty, but the idea that it is not a deterrent is ridiculous.