Dear Folks,

Have you heard the news?

I am a follower of Sam Altman (alias Sammy Boy), and I have recently been reading about how Sam Altman will save his company, OpenAI, using his new AI Glasses, which can turn plain wives into Living Dolls, similar to Marylynn Monroe, and even Twiggy, if one prefers the skinny ones.

So, my question is:

1. How much would you pay for Sam’s AI Glasses?

2. Would you ever take them off, while puttering around your house?

3. Would you use these glasses for other purposes, such as changing your wife from one color to another?

Some say that OpenAI will never make money. But they are completely wrong, if Sam’s new invention is true, and if he can bring his invention to market at a reasonable cost.

Some billionaires will not need these glasses, simply because they can go out and buy the real thing.

But, for most of us, being able to associate with stunning Living Dolls is only a dream which we cannot afford.

Therefore, if Sam can market his new AI Glasses for a reasonable price, perhaps about USD20,000 per pair, then would you buy them?

And, also, would you ever take them off?

As for me, since I no longer have a wife, I might just use them to turn my refrigerator or microwave  into a Marylynn Monroe.

Some guys like to date a new girl every few hours.

And, Sam’s glasses could make this possible, too.

What do you think?

Do you still think that OpenAI will soon go completely bankrupt?

Best regards,

Gamma

Important Societal Note:  Do you agree that Altman’s new AI Glasses will provide increased stability to society by lowering divorce rates in North America…???

After discussion with my favorite AI, I think Gemini finally understands the Human Perspective:

There will soon be no need for divorce.

Thank you, Altman....!!!!

You will cure Cancer and Divorce.

Altman will be our savior in our brave new world.

9 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Altman will be our savior in our brave new world.

I don't care who you think that may be as long as YOU do not think that it is going to be YOU!

1 minute ago, scottiejohn said:

I don't care who you think that may be as long as YOU do not think that it is going to be YOU!

You are such a loser and don't even know it. Hint - people avoid you because they find you repulsive.

Constantly screaming at everyone does that make you feel good?

2 minutes ago, atpeace said:

You are such a loser and don't even know it. Hint - people avoid you because they find you repulsive.

Constantly screaming at everyone does that make you feel good?

Given that wording/phrasing I wonder which other user names you have used in the very recent past?

PS; I am sure you are well loved too, when you look in the mirror!

1 minute ago, scottiejohn said:

Given that wording/phrasing I wonder which other user names you have used in the very recent past?

PS; I am sure you are well loved too, when you look in the mirror!

Been using this name since 2014 :) Do you get pleasure out of hurting others?

You have some major issues and you need to figure out why you are so unhappy or seek professional help.

2 minutes ago, atpeace said:

Been using this name since 2014 :) Do you get pleasure out of hurting others?

You have some major issues and you need to figure out why you are so unhappy or seek professional help.

His input/output is merely based on Irony....seemingly....

2 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

His input/output is merely based on Irony....seemingly....

That is a compassionate way of looking at it but I don't think "irony" is the term I would use. He is the type of person that is so unhappy with his existence and foolishly seeks pleasure in hurting others.

9 minutes ago, atpeace said:

Been using this name since 2014 :) Do you get pleasure out of hurting others?

You have some major issues and you need to figure out why you are so unhappy or seek professional help.

I do not know what has caused you to start attacking me but since you are the one who started the first attack on me I would suggest that you go and figure out your need for professional help!

Please do not respond to this post!

28 minutes ago, atpeace said:

That is a compassionate way of looking at it but I don't think "irony" is the term I would use. He is the type of person that is so unhappy with his existence and foolishly seeks pleasure in hurting others.

Or, Biblically Speaking....

It is also possible that he is one who....

Sees through the Glass....

Darkly

Perhaps, and I am not saying it might be true....

He is just one of those who should invest in a pair of Altman Glasses.....

Note: Far be it for me to say....one way or another....of course.

15 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

He is just one of those who should invest in a pair of Altman Glasses.....

Are these supplied by Trust In TRUMP Syndicates (TITS) Inc?

Remember Gamma, the wives could use the same glasses, as it's usually the men who think they're more attractive than they are, and women who underestimate their own attractiveness.

5 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Remember Gamma, the wives could use the same glasses, as it's usually the men who think they're more attractive than they are, and women who underestimate their own attractiveness.

I am sure that Altman has already considered this possiblity.

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

Remember Gamma, the wives could use the same glasses, as it's usually the men who think they're more attractive than they are, and women who underestimate their own attractiveness.

In today's world, many women tend to overestimate their attractiveness.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329327914_Almost_every_woman_thinks_she's_hotter_than_the_average_Differences_in_self-assessments_of_physical_attractiveness_between_women_and_men

Better than average" (BTA) effect is a tendency of people to evaluate themselves more positively than they evaluate others. The goal of this study was to examine if women and men show differences in BTA effect when self-assessing their own physical attractiveness (PA), compared to other hypothetical people as a standard. A sample of 444 participants (52.5% women), of the mean age of 26.85 years, rated their own PA on a 10-point scale using a hypothetical average person of the same gender and age as a reference point. Compared to a theoretical mean of 5.5, both genders rated themselves significantly higher than the average. Thus, both women and men exhibit BTA when self-assessing their own PA. In other words, they (arguably) overrate it, but the effect is stronger for women. A random woman, compared to a random man, is 63% more likely to rate her looks higher and will consider herself as being more attractive compared to a (hypothetical) average woman in 94% of cases (compared to a probability of 78% for men). This gender difference in BTA effect can only partially be explained by higher levels of satisfaction with life, physical activity, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience.

3 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

In today's world, many women tend to overestimate their attractiveness.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329327914_Almost_every_woman_thinks_she's_hotter_than_the_average_Differences_in_self-assessments_of_physical_attractiveness_between_women_and_men

Better than average" (BTA) effect is a tendency of people to evaluate themselves more positively than they evaluate others. The goal of this study was to examine if women and men show differences in BTA effect when self-assessing their own physical attractiveness (PA), compared to other hypothetical people as a standard. A sample of 444 participants (52.5% women), of the mean age of 26.85 years, rated their own PA on a 10-point scale using a hypothetical average person of the same gender and age as a reference point. Compared to a theoretical mean of 5.5, both genders rated themselves significantly higher than the average. Thus, both women and men exhibit BTA when self-assessing their own PA. In other words, they (arguably) overrate it, but the effect is stronger for women. A random woman, compared to a random man, is 63% more likely to rate her looks higher and will consider herself as being more attractive compared to a (hypothetical) average woman in 94% of cases (compared to a probability of 78% for men). This gender difference in BTA effect can only partially be explained by higher levels of satisfaction with life, physical activity, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience.

I've seen studies for both sides of thinking, with more on the men's side, but again, it is still both sides that under and over estimate, as the link shows, and this linkhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12382781/ delves deeper into a closely related area..............https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/201507/when-men-arent-good-looking-they-think

8 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

In today's world, many women tend to overestimate their attractiveness.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329327914_Almost_every_woman_thinks_she's_hotter_than_the_average_Differences_in_self-assessments_of_physical_attractiveness_between_women_and_men

Better than average" (BTA) effect is a tendency of people to evaluate themselves more positively than they evaluate others. The goal of this study was to examine if women and men show differences in BTA effect when self-assessing their own physical attractiveness (PA), compared to other hypothetical people as a standard. A sample of 444 participants (52.5% women), of the mean age of 26.85 years, rated their own PA on a 10-point scale using a hypothetical average person of the same gender and age as a reference point. Compared to a theoretical mean of 5.5, both genders rated themselves significantly higher than the average. Thus, both women and men exhibit BTA when self-assessing their own PA. In other words, they (arguably) overrate it, but the effect is stronger for women. A random woman, compared to a random man, is 63% more likely to rate her looks higher and will consider herself as being more attractive compared to a (hypothetical) average woman in 94% of cases (compared to a probability of 78% for men). This gender difference in BTA effect can only partially be explained by higher levels of satisfaction with life, physical activity, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience.

White women are mostly ugly and annoying. Bodies like men. Post 25yo they go downhill fast.

1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

I've seen studies for both sides of thinking, with more on the men's side, but again, it is still both sides that under and over estimate.

I feel you're stuck in SIMP mode and the past. Social media has made many women narcissistic.

2 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

White women are mostly ugly and annoying. Bodies like men. Post 25yo they go downhill fast.

The corn-fed diet has not been beneficial for women or men.

1 minute ago, Effective altruism said:

I feel you're stuck in SIMP mode and the past. Social media has made many women narcissistic.

Actually, simp mode is one place I've never been, but I'm used to some here assuming things. My ex wife is a covert narcissist, the hardest to see through, and I've researched about narcissists for decades, knowing it's always been more men than women.

1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

Actually, simp mode is one place I've never been, but I'm used to some here assuming things. My ex wife is a covert narcissist, the hardest to see through, and I've researched about narcissists for decades, knowing it's always been more men than women.

Post some relevant research.

1 minute ago, Effective altruism said:

The corn-fed diet has not been beneficial for women or men.

Corn is fine. Sugar, wheat, lack of exercise.

2 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Actually, simp mode is one place I've never been, but I'm used to some here assuming things. My ex wife is a covert narcissist, the hardest to see through, and I've researched about narcissists for decades, knowing it's always been more men than women.

You studied narcs for decades but could not spot one? A covert narc might be hard to spot if you see them once a month but not if daily.

2 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

Post some relevant research.

Very easy to look up, but this is AI ..................Research shows that men are more likely to be narcissists than women, with studies indicating men score higher on narcissistic personality traits and are more frequently diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). Studies suggest up to 75% of those diagnosed with NPD are men, driven largely by higher levels of entitlement and desire for leadership/authority. ....................This matches all of the studies and countless books and podcasts I've read and listened to the last 3 decades. Here's one found in a few seconds. There are many more.......https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/close-encounters/202306/how-narcissism-rates-differ-depending-on-age-and-sex.

1 minute ago, Rockyroad said:

You studied narcs for decades but could not spot one? A covert narc might be hard to spot if you see them once a month but not if daily.

Research how they work and you'll understand more how they get through to millions of people every day.

6 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

I feel you're stuck in SIMP mode and the past. Social media has made many women narcissistic.

Women often don't age well mentally or physically. A lot of women are very stupid. They care more about the opinions of other women than using common sense.

3 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Very easy to look up, but this is AI ..................Research shows that men are more likely to be narcissists than women, with studies indicating men score higher on narcissistic personality traits and are more frequently diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). Studies suggest up to 75% of those diagnosed with NPD are men, driven largely by higher levels of entitlement and desire for leadership/authority. ....................This matches all of the studies and countless books and podcasts I've read and listened to the last 3 decades.

Link?

2 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Research how they work and you'll understand more how they get through to millions of people every day.

They fool dumb men not smart ones. A lot of men are clueless about women.

1 minute ago, Rockyroad said:

They fool dumb men not smart ones. A lot of men are clueless about women.

1 minute ago, Rockyroad said:

No, they fool empaths. as they're most likely to trust. It has nothing to do with intelligence. Like I said, research more.

5 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

Corn is fine. Sugar, wheat, lack of exercise.

You’re not getting it. High-fructose corn syrup in processed foods is making people obese in the USA.

3 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

Link?

One of many. if you read into it, it isn't as cut and dried as there are differences in how narcissists act in women and men................https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_narcissism.

1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

No, they fool empaths. as they're most likely to trust. It has nothing to do with intelligence. Like I said, research more.

They fool dumb men who think with their dick. You can tell a lot about a person simply by looking at what they spend money on. This goes both ways. A woman call work out a man quickly too by watching his spending habits. What you spend money on directly reflects your priorities in life.