Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Virginia voters approve Democrats' redistricting plan

Featured Replies

  • Author
12 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Not a fan, but there really is no room to complain at the Democrats ruthlessly exercising power. It actually is one of those "both sides do it" situations.

There must be some way to use, I dunno, computers? or AI? to arrange districts that are fair and also make sense geographically. Creating districts that look like a lobster or a dragon is almost insulting to the voters.

Actually a few States like Arizona and California had such a system. They were instituted by referenda.

And at least in California and Virginia, voters actually got to decide about how to apportion districts. In Texas, Florida and North Carolina it was the legislature that decided. And since the legislatures are controlled by Republicans, the outcome was obvious.

  • Replies 57
  • Views 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • The party of democracy is working to disenfranchise half the state.

  • Alan Zweibel
    Alan Zweibel

    The Virginia Democrats are responsible for their own actions. They are fighting against the Republicans who started this battle. Ignoring the context, which is what you are doing, is obviously disinge

  • Alan Zweibel
    Alan Zweibel

    Yes. What they're doing is wrong. Of course, this didn't start with the Democrats, did it. In fact, it started with the Republicans long before Trump called for redrawing congressional districts to be

Posted Images

This is a good thing, the morally bent Republican leaders started this incredibly corrupt practice of redistricting and the Democrats have had no choice other than to follow through with their own version.

Many of us are fantasizing about the Dems taking both the house and the Senate and leaving the big circus clown doubly impotent. Impeachment proceedings can then start, along with the criminal investigation into his sons for massive corruption, and war crime investigations against Tiny Pete.

If all that happens it's likely Trump will either resign in 2027 or give himself an aneurysm.

This is a good thing, the morally bent Republican leaders started this incredibly corrupt practice of redistricting and the Democrats have had no choice other than to follow through with their own version.

Many of us are fantasizing about the Dems taking both the house and the Senate and leaving the big circus clown doubly impotent. Impeachment proceedings can then start, along with the criminal investigation into his sons for massive corruption, and war crime investigations against Tiny Pete.

If all that happens it's likely Trump will either resign in 2027 or give himself an aneurysm.

Fantasizing is the operative word.


Perhaps it would be better, if the Democrats gain control of Congress to, I dunno... propose legislation to help the citizens? Reduce the deficit? Ensure national security? Provide for the general good?

Nah, another political witch hunt! Exactly what the country wants...

36 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Fantasizing is the operative word.


Perhaps it would be better, if the Democrats gain control of Congress to, I dunno... propose legislation to help the citizens? Reduce the deficit? Ensure national security? Provide for the general good?

Nah, another political witch hunt! Exactly what the country wants...

How soon you forget, but over the last four decades most Democratic administrations have produced a significantly lower deficit than Republic Administrations, and most democratic administrations have had significantly better numbers in terms of job creation and the overall economy. Somehow the current destruction of the economy seems to be passing by a lot of his followers at this moment.

  • Author
1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

Fantasizing is the operative word.


Perhaps it would be better, if the Democrats gain control of Congress to, I dunno... propose legislation to help the citizens? Reduce the deficit? Ensure national security? Provide for the general good?

Nah, another political witch hunt! Exactly what the country wants...

I make it a point on principle disagree with you. But in this case I'm going to have to make an exception. I don't see what good an impeachment would do. Even if Trump were to be impeached, he'd never be convicted in the Senate. So what's the point? Better for the Democrats to propose programs that certainly won't pass in the form proposed, but at least it will establish a template for President Beshear to follow.

Aww, this is just so sad to see.

Som nam naa, they say where I live.thumbsup

I make it a point on principle disagree with you. But in this case I'm going to have to make an exception. I don't see what good an impeachment would do. Even if Trump were to be impeached, he'd never be convicted in the Senate. So what's the point? Better for the Democrats to propose programs that certainly won't pass in the form proposed, but at least it will establish a template for President Beshear to follow.

I would prefer a President Shapiro if the Democrats were to win, but they will never nominate a Jew. Their base would stay home.

MAGA is against the Virginia redistricting vote because there was consent involved.

On 4/22/2026 at 2:14 AM, candide said:

Moreover, Republicans voted against HR 1, a law banning gerrymandering and establishing independent redistricting.

And now now they are bitten in the ass! 😃

HR1 was an anti gerrymandering bill. There was a lot more to the bill. Which is why it died in the Senate.

  • 2 weeks later...

The VA Supreme Court struck down the Democrats' map.

https://www.wtvr.com/news/virginia-politics/supreme-court-virginia-redistricting-ruling-may-8-2026

RICHMOND, Va. — The Supreme Court of Virginia struck down a redistricting referendum Friday that voters narrowly approved in a special election, ruling that Democratic lawmakers violated procedural rules when they referred a constitutional amendment to the ballot to create Virginia's new congressional map.

3 hours ago, TedG said:

The VA Supreme Court struck down the Democrats' map.

https://www.wtvr.com/news/virginia-politics/supreme-court-virginia-redistricting-ruling-may-8-2026

RICHMOND, Va. — The Supreme Court of Virginia struck down a redistricting referendum Friday that voters narrowly approved in a special election, ruling that Democratic lawmakers violated procedural rules when they referred a constitutional amendment to the ballot to create Virginia's new congressional map.

Ouch LOL.

This one isnt againg well. I wonder when the OP will be here under his new name to spin.

On 4/23/2026 at 3:04 AM, spidermike007 said:

How soon you forget, but over the last four decades most Democratic administrations have produced a significantly lower deficit than Republic Administrations,

This is like saying a 500-pound man lost 7 pounds under the Democrats compared to 5 pounds under the Republicans. The fact is that the Democrats have created an unsustainable federal government.

In 2018, North Carolina held an election using congressional maps that had already been ruled unconstitutional. The winners were seated anyway. In 2022, Ohio did the same thing. Georgia and Alabama moved forward with racist maps in 2022 that violated the Voting Rights Act. The winners of those elections were seated anyway. When it’s Republicans disenfranchising Black voters and Democrats, illegal maps are suddenly good enough to keep in place during the election. None of those states even put their maps up for approval by the public like Virginia did. Virginia should proceed with their election under the map their voters just enacted. Anything less would establish an unfair precedent.

MAGA is scared, and on the run. Time to make them squeel!thumbsup

8 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

In 2018, North Carolina held an election using congressional maps that had already been ruled unconstitutional.

There is more to the story than this.

A three-judge federal panel ruled in August 2018 that the map violated the U.S. Constitution because Republican lawmakers had drawn districts to entrench partisan advantage. However, the court did not order new maps in time for the 2018 midterm elections, partly because the election process was already underway and because the U.S. Supreme Court had not yet issued a final nationwide standard on partisan gerrymandering.

10 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Georgia and Alabama moved forward with racist maps in 2022 that violated the Voting Rights Act. The winners of those elections were seated anyway. When it’s Republicans disenfranchising Black voters and Democrats, illegal maps are suddenly good enough to keep in place during the election.

In Alabama:

  • The state’s congressional map was challenged in Allen v. Milligan.

  • Lower courts found the map likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because it created only one majority-Black district despite Alabama’s large Black population.

  • But the 2022 election still proceeded under the disputed map after the Supreme Court of the United States temporarily blocked the lower court order requiring a redraw. Republicans elected under that map were seated normally.

  • In 2023, the Supreme Court ultimately upheld the Voting Rights Act challenge and Alabama had to redraw its map.

12 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

illegal maps are suddenly good enough to keep in place during the election. None of those states even put their maps up for approval by the public like Virginia did. Virginia should proceed with their election under the map their voters just enacted. Anything less would establish an unfair precedent.

Guess what. The VA Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that the Democrats didn't follow the proper process to hold a vote on a Constitutional amendment. The Democrats were warned about this before the process started.

  1. Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares: The Attorney General publicly warned that Democrats were "ignoring clear state law" by failing to post the required 90-day public notice at courthouses and by attempting to bypass the constitutional requirement for two separate legislative sessions with an intervening election.

  2. Judicial Rulings: In January 2026, Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. ruled the resolution illegal. He warned that lawmakers had failed to follow their own rules for special sessions and had not published the amendment three months before the election as required.

On 4/21/2026 at 11:10 PM, marin said:

Silly comment, as look what the public said on Tuesday April 21st in the state of Virginia.

rs

Seems to me like 2.5 million members of the public voted fairly. 50.7% chose to vote for the measure, while 49.3% did not favor the measure. This is exactly what democracy is all about. Wake up to that fact.

Silly comment. It seems the court ruled the Democrats didn't allow the law.

On 4/21/2026 at 11:05 PM, Tug said:

We Americans are in a fight to save our democracy…..a war started by the felon in chief we shall prevail.we are forced to use any means to protect our constitution from project 2025.understand that.

I understand you feel strongly about protecting democracy and the Constitution, but talking about “war” and “any means necessary” is exactly the kind of language that keeps dividing Americans.

We can disagree about policies, elections and Project 2025 without treating fellow citizens as enemies.

If you truly want to preserve democracy, the answer is persuasion, voting, debate, and the rule of law!

Not fear or political extremism from either side.

34 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

When it’s Republicans disenfranchising Black voters and Democrats

The left managed to distort Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Here is the text

SEC. 2. No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.

Creating districts based on race is not in line with the 14th Amendment.

AMENDMENT XIV

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

16 hours ago, TedG said:

The left managed to distort Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Here is the text

SEC. 2. No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.

Creating districts based on race is not in line with the 14th Amendment.

AMENDMENT XIV

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

"Creating districts based on race is not in line with the 14th Amendment."

Congress has twice voted on making gerrymandering illegal, and both times almost all GOP reps voted against it.

Do you agree with what they did?

4 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Congress has twice voted on making gerrymandering illegal, and both times almost all GOP reps voted against it.

Do you agree with what they did?

The left and their propaganda are something else. There was no bill in Congress for the specific goal of ending garrermaning. There was HR1, which was an all-encompassing bill to take control of the national election apparatus. HR1 is 800 pages long. I'm amazed at how the left keeps repeating the same boring talking points all over the internet.

1 hour ago, TedG said:

The left and their propaganda are something else. There was no bill in Congress for the specific goal of ending garrermaning. There was HR1, which was an all-encompassing bill to take control of the national election apparatus. HR1 is 800 pages long. I'm amazed at how the left keeps repeating the same boring talking points all over the internet.

And I'm not amazed at your lame attempts at blowing smoke at all. I never said the bills covered gerrymandering only.

But I do recognize your effort in avoiding answering my question.thumbsup

Grok (AI):

image.png

  • Popular Post

Two Bullet Jay Jones, the new AG, filed an appeal over the court decision that put a stay on certifying the attempt at gerrymandering. He spelled Virginia and Senator incorrectly. This is the type of unqualified government officials you get by "Voting Blue No Matter Who".

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4562122/virginia-democrats-spelling-mistakes-redistricting-documents/

698607280_1547473206937659_2928272780069766904_n.jpg

  • Popular Post
2 minutes ago, TedG said:

Two Bullet Jay Jones, the new AG, filed an appeal over the court decision that put a stay on certifying the attempt at gerrymandering. He spelled Virginia and Senator incorrectly. This is the type of unqualified government officials you get by "Voting Blue No Matter Who".

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4562122/virginia-democrats-spelling-mistakes-redistricting-documents/

698607280_1547473206937659_2928272780069766904_n.jpg

Isn't this the leftist that "...sent a text to a colleague describing a scenario where, given two bullets to shoot either Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, or then-Republican House Speaker Todd Gilbert, he stated "Gilbert gets two bullets to the head". And then "In the same message exchange, Jones reportedly wished that the children of his political rivals would "die in their mother's arms".

Just another hi IQ leftist doing what he can to unite the country and stop the hate.

22 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Isn't this the leftist that "...sent a text to a colleague describing a scenario where, given two bullets to shoot either Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, or then-Republican House Speaker Todd Gilbert, he stated "Gilbert gets two bullets to the head". And then "In the same message exchange, Jones reportedly wished that the children of his political rivals would "die in their mother's arms".

Just another hi IQ leftist doing what he can to unite the country and stop the hate.

Check out this one.

Screenshot 2026-05-12 at 10.29.41 AM.png

3 minutes ago, TedG said:

Check out this one.

Screenshot 2026-05-12 at 10.29.41 AM.png

Because their the smart ones, don't 'cha know.

1 hour ago, TedG said:

Check out this one.

Screenshot 2026-05-12 at 10.29.41 AM.png

Oh my god what an embarassment

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Oh my god what an embarassment

They ae not embarrassed, they are shameless.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.