On 5/3/2026 at 8:35 PM, Chomper Higgot said:

Iran will get a nuclear weapon and thereafter will not be subjected to illegal wars of aggression .

What nuclear weapons do is not so much deterrance, but enablement. They enable nations to do things they would not otherwise be able to get away with. Allows countries to act with near impunity.

On 5/3/2026 at 1:54 AM, 3NUMBAS said:

Like gibing a monkey a automatic rifle to play with

Yes, I remember that a few years back on u-tube.

Edited May 5May 5 by rocketboy2

Honestly I think that would be the best, since it almost guarantees nobody will use them

Your assumption is that religious zealots are reasonable people.

They're not. They're fine martyring their entire country for Allah.

To underscore this point, Hasting’s article in The Times quoted the former Israeli Deputy National Security Advisor Chuck Freilich: “Iran has the requisite knowledge today to reconstitute the program, even after a completely successful attack. Military action is thus no longer an option for eliminating the program, only for gaining time.”

The only way that there will ever be peace in the Middle East is for the Mullahs to be swapped out for reasonable Iranians. I think that's referred to as "Regime Change". (Or for Israel to be wiped off the map. But that would just be a temporary reprieve. Then the Mullahs will be fighting some other enemy. Nobody in the region seems to like them, and the feeling is mutual...)

On 5/3/2026 at 12:17 AM, Yagoda said:

Look an American dude that hates Trump so much he's willing to have his entire country decimated.

The sickness is real

If the stories are true about Trump being kicked out of the room by General Cain because he wanted to get his hands on the nuclear codes, the sickness is far worse than anyone could imagine.

Just now, phetphet said:

If the stories are true about Trump being kicked out of the room by General Cain because he wanted to get his hands on the nuclear codes, the sickness is far worse than anyone could imagine.

False story .

Cain doesn't have the authority to block Trump .

Cain cannot stop Trump from getting the codes

Love the title. It reads. Maybe it's okey for our son to be gay (after years of denial)

Edited May 5May 5 by Foroitalico

On 5/3/2026 at 1:53 AM, mfd101 said:

Let's all have one. Or quite a few.

Seems to me that Trump is not the person / organization who has the right to set the policy on this issue. In fact I suggest it should not be one indiviual who has the right to set the policy on this issue.

Seems to me it should be a multi lateral dicussion with all countries entitled to / strongly encouraged to discuss and eventually decide a global policy. Perhaps that means a UN discussion and the UN deciding a policy. And if trump doesn't like the UN that's another matter.

Surely the reality is that Trump has zero entitlement (let alone capability) to make such policy.

Just now, scorecard said:

Seems to me that Trump is not the person / organization who has the right to set the policy on this issue. In fact I suggest it should not be one indiviual who has the right to set the policy on this issue.

Seems to me it should be a multi lateral dicussion with all countries entitled to / strongly encouraged to discuss and eventually decide a global policy. Perhaps that means a UN discussion and the UN deciding a policy. And if trump doesn't like the UN that's another matter.

Surely the reality is that Trump has zero entitlement (let alone capability) to make such policy.

Just now, scorecard said:

Seems to me that Trump is not the person / organization who has the right to set the policy on this issue. In fact I suggest it should not be one indiviual who has the right to set the policy on this issue.

Seems to me it should be a multi lateral dicussion with all countries entitled to / strongly encouraged to discuss and eventually decide a global policy. Perhaps that means a UN discussion and the UN deciding a policy. And if trump doesn't like the UN that's another matter.

Surely the reality is that Trump has zero entitlement (let alone capability) to make such policy.

Just now, scorecard said:

IMHO Trump is not the person / organization who has the right to set the policy on this issue. Further I suggest it should not be one indiviual who has the right to set the policy on this issue.

Seems to me it should be a multi lateral dicussion with all countries entitled to / strongly encouraged to discuss and eventually decide a global policy. Perhaps that means a UN discussion and the UN deciding a policy. And if trump doesn't like the UN that's another matter.

Surely the reality is that Trump has zero entitlement (let alone capability) to personally make such policy.

Maybe its better to have a Nuclear deterent, it tends to give you a bigger baseball bat if someone hits you with a stick.

Just now, Roadsternut said:

What nuclear weapons do is not so much deterrance, but enablement. They enable nations to do things they would not otherwise be able to get away with. Allows countries to act with near impunity.

Is that why China and North Korea have been starting so many wars lately, unlike America?

Assuming America gets hands on the uranium from Iran, does anyobody really believe that it will prevent Iran from starting all over again ? The solution may be only through proper diplomacy and to get back to the basics. Get Pakistan out of the equation and start having the talks in the UN in Geneva/Switzerland, where peace summits have always lead to success.

Just now, phetphet said:

If the stories are true about Trump being kicked out of the room by General Cain because he wanted to get his hands on the nuclear codes, the sickness is far worse than anyone could imagine.

Im afraid its just another grabbing the beasts steering wheel democrat BS fairytale. Like running into a group arachnophobia workshop screaming that giant spiders are eating everyone outside. See! Told you they were scary!😅🤣

The left will never pause on their deranged anti Trump/anti America/anti freedom hoaxes.

Just now, phetphet said:

If the stories are true about Trump being kicked out of the room by General Cain because he wanted to get his hands on the nuclear codes, the sickness is far worse than anyone could imagine.

They arent. The fact that you would believe that is sick.

Just now, SunnyinBangrak said:

Im afraid its just another grabbing the beasts steering wheel democrat BS fairytale. Like running into a group arachnophobia workshop screaming that giant spiders are eating everyone outside. See! Told you they were scary!😅🤣

The left will never pause on their deranged anti Trump/anti America/anti freedom hoaxes.

Yeah, right. Do you agree that Trump taking these "IQ tests" repeatedly is a good sign, Sunny?🤣

Just now, BLMFem said:

Yeah, right. Do you agree that Trump taking these "IQ tests" repeatedly is a good sign, Sunny?🤣

No. He just needs to fall over every day, shake hands with ghosts, get lost on stage, mangle his teleprompter speaches while whispeeing and shouting, and crap his pants in front of queen Camilla. Then the left will know without doubt that he is mentally A OK.

Listening to team delulu say he needs an IQ test and actually do it is quite silly. Just tell them to pound sand and get on with saving the world from leftism.

On 5/3/2026 at 12:17 AM, Yagoda said:

Look an American dude that hates Trump so much he's willing to have his entire country decimated.

The sickness is real

Indeed its quite astonishingly unreal .

The U.S. government officially designates the Iranian regime as the "world's leading state sponsor of terrorism." This is a long-standing official classification that has been reaffirmed by multiple U.S. administrations, including in 2026.

Its not just the USA saying this, there are 43 other countries that think the same.

Military experts agree that a nuclear-armed Iran would fundamentally change the rules of engagement:

Currently, the U.S. and Israel have been able to launch massive strikes against Iranian "hardware" (missile sites and nuclear infrastructure) precisely because Iran cannot escalate to a nuclear level.

If Iran had nukes, they could potentially close the Strait with more confidence, knowing that a full-scale U.S. invasion or "regime change" operation would risk a nuclear exchange.

A nuclear Iran would likely force rivals like Saudi Arabia to pursue their own nuclear programs, creating a "tripwire" environment where any small skirmish in the Strait could spiral into a global catastrophe.

Hard to imagine anyone would want that, but hey it looks like they do?

Get them Iranian nukes up and running, then stick them along the Israeli and American borders.

Might rein in the terrorists and calm them down a bit. 🙂

Just now, BarraMarra said:

Maybe its better to have a Nuclear deterent, it tends to give you a bigger baseball bat if someone hits you with a stick.

Well, the primary school full of young girls that were blown to smithereens would probably be standing. If Palestine had some, 50,000 women and children wouldn't have been butchered with bullets and bombs. Nukes as anti-terrorist devices. Very useful, and everyone that American and/or Israel talks smack about should have them.🙂

Iran already has nukes.

Iran chooses the wise option to NOT DECLARE they have them.

Iran is a nucler weapon state, already.

The CIA knows.

But, please don't ask me how I know.

Just now, Packer said:

Well, the primary school full of young girls that were blown to smithereens would probably be standing. If Palestine had some, 50,000 women and children wouldn't have been butchered with bullets and bombs. Nukes as anti-terrorist devices. Very useful, and everyone that American and/or Israel talks smack about should have them.🙂

Are you suggesting Palestine ( hamas) should have had a nuclear capability ?

Obama's plan all along was a nuclear Iran as an ally in the region, ergo, the JCPOA.

Just now, SunnyinBangrak said:

No. He just needs to fall over every day, shake hands with ghosts, get lost on stage, mangle his teleprompter speaches while whispeeing and shouting, and crap his pants in front of queen Camilla. Then the left will know without doubt that he is mentally A OK.

Listening to team delulu say he needs an IQ test and actually do it is quite silly. Just tell them to pound sand and get on with saving the world from leftism.

Just now, SunnyinBangrak said:

No. He just needs to fall over every day, shake hands with ghosts, get lost on stage, mangle his teleprompter speaches while whispeeing and shouting, and crap his pants in front of queen Camilla. Then the left will know without doubt that he is mentally A OK.

Listening to team delulu say he needs an IQ test and actually do it is quite silly. Just tell them to pound sand and get on with saving the world from leftism.

But who says the world needs to be saved from leftism?

And that of course bring the question of a definition of leftism. First thoughts it means sharing...

Just now, scorecard said:

But who says the world needs to be saved from leftism?

And that of course bring the question of a definition of leftism. First thoughts it means sharing...

Yes, they want to share the earnings of those that work, with those that don't.

Take $100 from a man and give $20 to four other men and you lose one vote, gain four votes, and get to keep $20.

Just keep doing it.

Just now, scorecard said:

But who says the world needs to be saved from leftism?

And that of course bring the question of a definition of leftism. First thoughts it means sharing...

For me it conjures up images of morons shouting "river to the sea", wanting open borders but only in successful nations inhabitted by caucasoids, wanting to confiscate $$ from productive citizens to pay for iphones and free houses for young foreign thugs, censorship and persecution for anyone that states basic fact about how dangerous these imports are making our country, cancelling biology and science, wanting big bearded dudes in our daughters changing rooms and battering female sportswomen, forced experimental jabs. And on and on..

Nothing leftist about "sharing".

Edited May 5May 5 by SunnyinBangrak

This is the way yes of course Iran needs a nuke so Isarel/US stop their illegal agression once and for all and let the world breathe. The US is running scared they know they can't defeat Iran with their rubber boats and missiles without toppling the global economy and making Joe Blow pay $5 gas. Check mate. The West is weak. Too much fat for far too long so the barbarians win - them's the rules of human history. Joe Blow wants what Joe Blow gets.

Israel has 90 nuclear weapons; why not Iran?

Just now, still kicking said:

Israel has 90 nuclear weapons; why not Iran?

Because Israel is a civilized country. Iran isnt

Just now, still kicking said:

Israel has 90 nuclear weapons; why not Iran?

Israel is a one bomb and done country - might have been a mistake to have put all the eggs in one basket. But God does what (s)he does.

Edited May 6May 6 by beautifulthailand99

Just now, Yagoda said:

Because Israel is a civilized country. Iran isnt

Bless - what a joke.

Just now, beautifulthailand99 said:

Bless - what a joke.

As opposed to the guy advocated nuking a country LOL. Got it.