11 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

No-one can be asymptomatic. Nature does not work like that.

You didn't get the memo?

Robert Koch eventually realized that asymptomatic carriers exist and spread diseases.

While formulating his famous postulates in the late 19th century, he originally stated that a disease-causing microbe must be present in all suffering organisms but absent in healthy ones. However, as his work progressed, he discovered this strict rule did not hold true.

He observed that healthy individuals could act as carriers and spread diseases like cholera and typhoid fever without ever showing symptoms themselves. Because this discovery fundamentally contradicted his own initial guidelines, Koch abandoned the universal exclusivity requirement of his first postulate.

See what happens when you don't keep up? You end up looking very foolish.

Most of AN is not so easily fooled. You haven't been successful in foisting your stories on here. Everybody reading your old Issan thread knew your French friend was in reality YOU! And everybody knows your original name on AN was owl sees all. Apparently it's your nature to be deceitful and your Nature does rule you.

Return to posting about Issan life. Why bother with all this nonsense? That very long thread was very interesting. What has led you to this silly obsession?

Edited May 25May 25 by gamb00ler

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

There is no such thing as contagion. No-one can be asymptomatic. Nature does not work like that.

Yes, Robert Koch eventually acknowledged that his first postulate was not always true. However, the nature of this acknowledgement is nuanced.

Here is how the historical record breaks down:

While working with diseases like cholera and typhoid fever, Koch made a groundbreaking discovery: some healthy individuals carried the pathogen Vibrio cholerae without ever showing symptoms of the illness.

Because these healthy people were "harboring" the bacteria, they directly violated the rule that a pathogen must be absent in healthy subjects.

Historically, Koch was known as an empirical scientist who focused heavily on investigative techniques rather than writing theoretical treatises on methodology.

• No Formal Correction: Koch never published a formal, revised list of his postulates formally striking out the exclusivity clause of his first rule.

• Pragmatic Abandonment: He explicitly acknowledged and accepted the reality of asymptomatic carriers, essentially abandoning the absolute requirement of the first postulate in practice.

Edited May 25May 25 by gamb00ler

2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

Why bother with all this nonsense? That very long thread was very interesting. What has led you to this silly obsession?

Why bother?

Well Sir, you are way beyond any help. But, if I can save babes and toddlers from being injected with filthy junk in a syringe, with the dumb white-coat doctor muttering 'safe n effective'. then all will have been worth it.

Nature rules OK. Even in Isaan.

Edited May 25May 25 by Stiddle Mump

55 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

But, if I can save babes and toddlers from being injected with filthy junk in a syringe

and...... what does this have to do with asymptomatic carriers which your long dead idol had to admit are real? Once again you're confused.

58 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Nature rules OK. Even in Isaan.

Nature is not complete without the truth.... which it seems you find very elusive.

On 5/18/2026 at 11:02 PM, rattlesnake said:

They were pushing it really hard in the French media for a few days – same terminology, same "health" political representatives in press conferences, same 24/7 coverage, same stories of people rushing to buy masks… it was very similar to what happened in the early days of Covid. There was one notable difference, though: nobody believes a word they say anymore, and the coverage is already subsiding. There was a lot of pushback on social media and that is where the opinion is (the intelligence services know that and monitor them). A story can only have relevance if people lend it credence.

Covid is not going to happen again, especially since Trump withdrew from the WHO. This model (supranational bodies governing all the countries of the world in coordination) is over… Globalism is over. And poor Tedros is there spouting his BS as if this was 2020, like a washed-up has-been churning out his old hits to a two-thirds empty room…

Yes and no. The USA is still participating in the Ebola sxxx, despite the fact that it is no longer a WHO member.

4 hours ago, highrider said:

Yes and no. The USA is still participating in the Ebola sxxx, despite the fact that it is no longer a WHO member.

Leaving the WHO is merely one item of a long list to check in order to reach sovereignty.

On 5/25/2026 at 8:12 AM, gamb00ler said:

Most of AN is not so easily fooled. You haven't been successful in foisting your stories on here. Everybody reading your old Issan thread knew your French friend was in reality YOU! And everybody knows your original name on AN was owl sees all. Apparently it's your nature to be deceitful and your Nature does rule you.

I guess you are referring to Monsieur Vous there Gamby.

You are just jealous 'cause he was slick with the French ladies.

I am starting another of my conspiracy theory updates .........

moons, viruses, wars, food shortages, big harma ongoing mafia tactics, political corruption (no. 1 again this week ) ...... nothing much really to write home about (in my opinion, of course) .

The Main Show on Planet earth (which is the real reason for the Big Takeover that has been boiling the frogs ( not just the French) for the last ten years or so ...... is ..............

on my new post .....

4 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

guess you are referring to Monsieur Vous there Gamby.

You are just jealous 'cause he was slick with the French ladies.

Your bizarre machinations to retain access to AN are probably reflective of a wide obsessive streak in your personality. Your post is just more evidence of that.