4 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Absolute nonsense. Anyone can say that.

Say what you like, it's fine. Hate speech and racism is not ok. What you just posted as a hypothetical scenario would be fine.

If you happen to be in the vicinity of the next Islamist terror attack, do you think you'll be spared because you sympathise with them? You won't I'm afraid.

3 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

In this case, whoever set the fire. In general, antisemites are attacking Jews.

All the recent attacks have been carried out by Muslims

Just now, save the frogs said:

Maybe it's been debunked by people who are afraid the truth comes out.

No, the Khazar theory has been debunked by professionals who have a real grasp of history and genetics.

Just now, save the frogs said:

Anyway, I don't have time to do a Phd in the history of the Jews.

But neither will I devote 42% of my waking life defending them when the facts are murky.

All the best.

You don't need a Ph.D in any subject to separate fact from whacko theories. The facts aren't murky; they are crystal clear.

Just because an individual proposes a wild theory doesn't mean it's worthy of consideration. David Icke claimed the British Royal Family was descended from alien lizards, Does that make the ancestry of the current monarch "murky?"

Just now, Evil Penevil said:

Does that make the ancestry of the current monarch "murky?"

Even without needing to entertain wild theories, the facts and who is entitled to what are still murky.

They were exiled 1000 years ago and decided to come back to reclaim their land?

But there were people that were living there (and never left?).

Do you think if a group is exiled and comes back to the land 1000 years later, it gives them the right to kick out existing inhabitants who have nothing to do with the group that exiled them?

It might make more sense if they were kicked out by the same group living there, and then got their army together and came back later to get revenge on that same group of people. But that's not the case.

26 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

There has been an attack against a former synagogue.

Suspected arson attack at former synagogue in east London

So, a building then.

Wow, they really do clutch at bizarre things to scream about, don't they . It's almost as if they're trying to find antisemitism anywhere and everywhere and are now just coming up with absurdities . 🙂

What's next, there's a car crash involving a vehicle that was previously owned by a Jew and 'Car ramming incident against former Jew mobile highlights rising hate crimes against Jews!' ? 🙂

35 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

There has been an attack against a former synagogue.

Suspected arson attack at former synagogue in east London

Counter-terrorism police are investigating the incident after a number of attacks on Jewish sites.

Counter-terrorism police are investigating a suspected arson attack at a former synagogue.

Jewish security charity Shomrim said that fire crews were called out to the building in Nelson Street, Whitechapel, east London, in the early hours of Tuesday.

The incident is being investigated alongside a number of apparent attacks on Jewish sites in London since late March.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jewish-shomrim-whitechapel-keir-starmer-tower-hamlets-b2970636.html

"minor damage had been caused to a set of gates and a lock at the front of the building."

"has not been operational as a synagogue for some years"

Watch out for Himmler and Hitler reincarnated guys, it's getting like 1930's Bavaria out there! 😂

Just now, Packer said:

Wow, they really do clutch at bizarre things to scream about, don't they . It's almost as if they're trying to find antisemitism anywhere and everywhere and are now just coming up with absurdities .

Arson is a serious crime under any circumstances, while attacking a Jewish site has always been considered antisemitism. Arson has the potential to cause major property damage as well as kill people and is never taken lightly by police. The fire could spread to other buildings.

Just now, Evil Penevil said:

Arson is a serious crime under any circumstances, while attacking a Jewish site has always been considered antisemitism. Arson has the potential to cause major property damage as well as kill people and is never taken lightly by police. The fire could spread to other buildings.

"minor damage had been caused to a set of gates and a lock at the front of the building."

"has not been operational as a synagogue for some years"

It's as if many are overcome with psychopathic paranoia.

Quite worrying for humanity when paired with a Never is Now! Kill them before they kill you! mindset. 🙂

9 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

Arson is a serious crime under any circumstances

Including when Israeli 'settlers' set fire to the homes of Palestinians in Palestine (the West Bank)?

A gate on a building that isn't a synagogue is a bit minor, isn't it? 🙂

1 hour ago, Packer said:

"minor damage had been caused to a set of gates and a lock at the front of the building."

"has not been operational as a synagogue for some years"

It's as if many are overcome with psychopathic paranoia.

Quite worrying for humanity when paired with a Never is Now! Kill them before they kill you! mindset. 🙂

This wasn't a one off random attack , its was part of numerous attacks on Jewish connected places .

Had this been the only attack, then its antisemitic intent could be questionable .

But as this was a series of attacks, its antisemitic intend is clear .

It does seem to be a genuine anti semitic attack, rather than paranoia .

4 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

If you happen to be in the vicinity of the next Islamist terror attack, do you think you'll be spared because you sympathise with them? You won't I'm afraid.

What's the got to do with the price of fish?

I was replying to someone who said you can't say,"Muslim women are more likely to be told to cover up from head to toe than any other religion".

Of course you can say it.

8 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

In this case, whoever set the fire. In general, antisemites are attacking Jews.

And these antisemites are of which origin ?

4 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

All the recent attacks have been carried out by Muslims

Exactly. And that includes so called poor immigrants coming over in dinghies.

25 minutes ago, geisha said:

And these antisemites are of which origin ?

In the U.K., many antisemites are of Muslim ancestry, but others are plain-vanilla Brits. In general, antisemites can be of any origin, but most are Christians or Muslims.

This is excellent news. It strikes home the seriousness of crimes motivated by antisemitism as well as their connection to attempts by some national governments to eliminate Israel.

Proxies carrying out antisemitic attacks in UK could face 14 years in prison

Plans to be included in king’s speech will allow tougher action against proxies for foreign powers such as Iran

Offenders who commit antisemitic attacks backed by foreign powers such as Iran will face 14 years in prison under legislation to be included in the king’s speech next week.

Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, will be given the power under the National Security Act to designate proxy groups, such as those thought to be behind the recent attacks on the Jewish community, as a foreign intelligence service.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/may/06/proxies-carrying-out-antisemitic-attacks-in-uk-could-face-14-years-in-prison

3 hours ago, Packer said:

It's as if many are overcome with psychopathic paranoia.

Quite worrying for humanity when paired with a Never is Now! Kill them before they kill you! mindset. 🙂

Roughly 40% of the world's Jews were murdered between 1939 and 1945. That's a significant reason for Jews to take steps to guarantee their survival and has nothing to do with paranoia. If there's one group that haters have been out to get, it's the Jews.

Never Again is Now! is only worrying for antisemites planning a second Holocaust, not humanity.

3 hours ago, Packer said:

Including when Israeli 'settlers' set fire to the homes of Palestinians in Palestine (the West Bank)?

Yes, that would be serious if it happens. Jewish lives and property could be threatened if the fire got out of control. But that is only a hypothetical example.

3 hours ago, Packer said:

A gate on a building that isn't a synagogue is a bit minor, isn't it? 🙂

The fact the fire didn't catch and cause more damage or endanger lives doesn't make it any less an attempt at arson, which is always serious.

11 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Absolute nonsense. Anyone can say that.

Say what you like, it's fine. Hate speech and racism is not ok. What you just posted as a hypothetical scenario would be fine.

Do you drive a taxi? This is what you sound like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkCBhKs4faI

I don't watch youtube nonsense, only fools use youtube as verified evidence.

I never mentioned hate speech, you introduced that, I just mentioned non-muslims can not say anything at all negative in public about muslims in the UK even though it is true as it is immediately deemed racist.

Yous state "Absolute nonsense", Ok so give me the names of the terms used for Buddhists, Christians etc which are quoted as a phobia if they exist, I am always willing to learn, you could make one up I suppose as the other Islamaphobia words have been made up.

My comment in no way states I am pro-hate-speech, you have made a link where there is no link at all.

Where did the idiotic taxi driver comment come from, are you against taxi drivers, do you find them to be lower somehow?

Are you a chimney sweeper? 😃

But keep up the good work as I like to spend ten minute breaks a couple of times a day on this noddy blog while taking a break from my software engineering business as it makes quite a contrast to my real life.

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

What's the got to do with the price of fish?

I was replying to someone who said you can't say,"Muslim women are more likely to be told to cover up from head to toe than any other religion".

Of course you can say it.

Go and give it a try in public face to face with a muslim.

It is indeed encouraging the U.K. is reacting to the surge in antisemitism with strong countermeasures. This is the best possible use of the British taxpayers' money as it goes to protect a minority group from unprovoked attacks motivated by hatred.

Metropolitan Police announce 100 extra officers to protect London’s Jewish community from hate crimes

The Metropolitan Police has announced the formation of a new community protection team comprising 100 additional officers to safeguard London’s Jewish community.

This initiative comes despite the force’s chief previously saying that 300 more officers were needed to tackle the rise in antisemitism across the capital.

The force confirmed that in its initial phase, the new team will be “primarily focused on protecting the Jewish community, which faces some of the highest levels of hate crime alongside significant terrorist and hostile state threats”.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/golders-green-met-police-antisemitism-100-b2971182.html

Funding boost to help councils tackle antisemitism

Jewish communities across England will receive a further £1 million of government funding to tackle antisemitism and strengthen community cohesion in those places facing the greatest risk.

An immediate £500,000 will also be allocated to Barnet Council, reflecting recent serious antisemitic incidents in the borough and the large number of Jewish residents there.

There has been an alarming rise in antisemitism both in this country and across much of the globe, including the horrific antisemitic terrorist attacks in Heaton Park and Bondi Beach last year, and an appalling spate of antisemitic attacks in North West London in recent weeks.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/funding-boost-to-help-councils-tackle-antisemitism

Hate crime prosecutions to be fast-tracked after antisemitic attacks

Hate crime prosecutions are to be fasttracked following a spate of recent antisemitic incidents, the head of the Crown Prosecution Service has said.

Director of public prosecutions Stephen Parkinson has told prosecutors in England and Wales to bring charges more quickly, in order to clamp down on "daily incidents affecting the Jewish community, involving threats and abuse designed to cause fear and distress".

He told BBC News it "is important law enforcement steps up and recognises we are in a period of crisis for the Jewish community".

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz72eye5zzeo

2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

This wasn't a one off random attack , its was part of numerous attacks on Jewish connected places .

Had this been the only attack, then its antisemitic intent could be questionable .

But as this was a series of attacks, its antisemitic intend is clear .

It does seem to be a genuine anti semitic attack, rather than paranoia .

Let's attack a synagogue!

No, no. Let's cause minor damage the gates of a building that used to be a synagogue years and years ago! But isn't a synagogue now! and hasn't been for years!

Poor poor angry Jews, see antisemitism everywhere they look. 🙂

49 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

Yes, that would be serious if it happens. Jewish lives and property could be threatened if the fire got out of control.

And the lives and property of the Palestinian's which were (and are) set on fire by Israelis?

Or as a Jew you care not about arson against Palestinians? 🙂

Jewish arsonists:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/22/israeli-settlers-carry-out-series-of-west-bank-attacks-as-security-forces-stand-by

The gate of a building, possibly just a random building, that used to be in front of a synagogue, but isn't in front of a synagogue anymore, is fire damaged and Jews go crazy. 🙂

46 minutes ago, Packer said:

⅚⁵

Let's attack a synagogue!

No, no. Let's cause minor damage the gates of a building that used to be a synagogue years and years ago! But isn't a synagogue now! and hasn't been for years!

Poor poor angry Jews, see antisemitism everywhere they look. 🙂

Spot on

If ever an incident had the appearance if a false-flag op, this is it.

57 minutes ago, Packer said:

Let's attack a synagogue!

No, no. Let's cause minor damage the gates of a building that used to be a synagogue years and years ago! But isn't a synagogue now! and hasn't been for years!

Poor poor angry Jews, see antisemitism everywhere they look. 🙂

As said previously , which you failed to comprehend , it was part of numerous attacks on Jewish related people /buildings

27 minutes ago, Packer said:

And the lives and property of the Palestinian's which were (and are) set on fire by Israelis?

Or as a Jew you care not about arson against Palestinians? 🙂

It is very bad when Israeli settlers set fire to Palestinian homes. The Israeli settlers responsible should be punished under Israeli law.

However, it can get complicated. The house burning in the video you posted was a response to the murder of an 18-year-old settler in a terrorist attack by a local Palestinian.

3 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

it was part of numerous attacks on Jewish related people /buildings

Why do you lie so much?

Police are investigating whether this incident is linked to a series of arson attacks and attempted attacks targeting Jewish Londoners

Do you understand the word investigating, or it's beyond your level of comprehension? 🙂

The building is currently being purchased by the Ashaadibi Education and Cultural Centre

It's currently being bough by Muslims to be an Islamic education center, but it's an attack on Jews! JEWS!!

😅

This is the gate after the so called arson attack. That is in front of a place that hasn't any current relationship with Jewry.

Please, think of the Jews in this time of horror!

4 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

The house burning in the video you posted was a response to the murder of an 18-year-old settler in a terrorist attack by a local Palestinian.

So, the house burning in the video is a war crime and crime against humanity if done during a war.

Collective punishment is strictly prohibited under international humanitarian law, particularly the 1949 Geneva Conventions, and is considered a war crime. It involves punishing individuals or groups for actions they did not personally commit, often used as deterrence. While often a war crime, systemic collective punishment can also be considered a crime against humanity when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population

The murderer should be arrested, charged, and if found guilty in a court of law, sentenced accordingly..... Anything other than that is.......?

Chief Rabbi Warns ‘Visibly Jewish’ People Not Safe in Britain

What is a "Visibly Jewish" person. Is the Chief Rabbi warning British followers of Judaism who believe that they "fit" a really messed up stereotype that perhaps they should move to American? Very odd to see Jewish religious leaders actually encouraging stereotyping. Sort of sad as well.

“The walls and ceiling of the room were perfectly black with age and dirt. There was a deal table before the fire: upon which were a candle stuck in a ginger-beer bottle, two or three pewter pots, a loaf and butter, and a plate. In a frying-pan, which was on the fire, and which was secured to the mantelshelf by a string, some sausages were cooking; and standing over them, with a toasting-fork in his hand, was a very old shrivelled Jew…”

Charles Dickens - 'Oliver'

18 minutes ago, Packer said:

Why do you lie so much?

OK , can you show that this wasn't an attack on Jewish related premises ?

If you can show that I was wrong then I will retract my claim

23 minutes ago, Packer said:

.

Please, think of the Jews in this time of horror!

You didn't show the full picture .

Building with Star of David is adjacent .

Which shows this was an anti semitic attack