Saturday at 06:12 AM4 days Sir Keir Starmer has said his decision to step down as prime minister was an "intensely personal" one made with his family, while warning that his likely successor, Andy Burnham, will face the same international pressures that dominated his own time in office.Get today's headlines by email In his first interview since announcing his resignation, Starmer rejected suggestions that a future prime minister could devote significantly more attention to domestic issues. He argued that global instability and challenges at home are closely connected and cannot be separated.Family Discussions Behind ResignationStarmer resigned within days of Burnham's victory in the Makerfield by-election, despite previously insisting he intended to remain in office and contest any leadership challenge.He told the BBC that the final decision came after spending a weekend at Chequers with his wife, Victoria, and their teenage children.Describing the choice as "really, really tough", Starmer said he consulted colleagues, advisers, trade unions and parliamentary allies before concluding that the decision ultimately rested with his family.He said accepting that his political career was over was an intensely personal moment and one he wanted to share privately with his wife.Warning for Andy BurnhamAlthough Starmer referred several times to "whoever my successor is", he acknowledged Burnham is widely expected to replace him.Responding to criticism that he spent too much time on international affairs during his premiership, Starmer said no prime minister could realistically reduce their diplomatic commitments.He said the world remains more dangerous and volatile than at any point during most of his lifetime, adding that the next prime minister would face the same international conflicts alongside continuing domestic challenges.Supporters of Burnham have expressed hope that he would place greater emphasis on issues such as the cost of living and public services.Reflecting on His LegacyStarmer said he had never held any personal animosity towards Burnham and pledged to do everything possible to support the next Labour government. He also confirmed he intends to remain an MP until at least the next general election but said he would avoid publicly advising his successor.Looking back on his leadership, Starmer said rebuilding Labour after becoming leader was central to his legacy. He described the party as politically, financially and morally bankrupt when he took over, saying restoring it had been "hard and bloody work".He argued that Labour's electoral success under his leadership should be considered alongside Clement Attlee's 1945 victory and Tony Blair's 1997 landslide, adding that he had helped save the party.However, Starmer acknowledged he ultimately lost the support of Labour MPs, who no longer believed he was the right person to lead the party into the next general election.Join the discussion? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 July 2026 View full article
Sunday at 12:31 AM3 days 9 minutes ago, Jim Blue said:Confused ....last week he was up for......another 10 years !until the 400 back stabbers decided otherwise,Kemi's words.....
Monday at 04:31 AM2 days No - you left because the country despised you and your fascist regime.Perhaps Burnham will learn from this and not try to subjugate the indigenous population via racist 2 tier policies and "justice".Good riddance you tyrant.
Monday at 06:43 AM2 days 2 hours ago, JonnyF said:No - you left because the country despised you and your fascist regime.Perhaps Burnham will learn from this and not try to subjugate the indigenous population via racist 2 tier policies and "justice".Good riddance you tyrant.Very unlikely Burnham will be any better. Given his track record it is likely he will be even worse.
Monday at 08:25 AM2 days 3 hours ago, JonnyF said:No - you left because the country despised you and your fascist regime.Perhaps Burnham will learn from this and not try to subjugate the indigenous population via racist 2 tier policies and "justice".Good riddance you tyrant.They walk amongst us - or they do in Thailand under the shadow of a quasi military dictatorship - because ....cheap or at least it was and ain't that the gospel truth.
Monday at 11:32 AM2 days I thought it was his backstabbing nodding dog front bench. Who by the way couldn't even find anyone to stand as PM instead of Backhander Burnham
Monday at 01:16 PM2 days He was despised by the pensioners, the farmers, the armed forces etc. He was brought in to lead the Nation and failed everyone. Then it finally dawned on him that his own party wanted shot of him as well
Create an account or sign in to comment