Three major nightclub fires in Thailand over the past years have highlighted recurring concerns over fire safety standards, following the latest blaze at a pub in Bangkok that left 27 people dead.

Get today's headlines by email

The most recent tragedy occurred at Na Lat Phrao Beer Hall near Lat Phrao Soi 1 on the night of 12 July 2026. According to preliminary information, the fire spread rapidly across the ceiling while the venue was crowded with customers

Investigators reported that many victims were found near the toilets and inside the toilet area. Initial findings suggest that when the power failed and thick smoke filled the building, some people were unable to locate the main exit and instead fled into the toilets, where they became trapped by smoke and flames.

The latest fire compares with two previous nightclub disasters that claimed dozens of lives. On 1 January 2009, a fire at Santika Pub in Bangkok began after stage pyrotechnics ignited the ceiling inside the enclosed venue. The blaze spread rapidly through flammable decorative materials, producing toxic smoke that resulted in 67 deaths and more than 100 injuries, with many victims caught at a narrow main exit.

More than 13 years later, on 5 August 2022, Mountain B nightclub in Sattahip caught fire after an electrical fault near the roof. The flames spread quickly because the building was lined with highly flammable acoustic foam, while a locked rear fire exit forced people to escape through a single front entrance. The disaster claimed 26 lives.

The comparison identifies three common factors across the major fires. The first is the continued use of flammable interior materials, including inexpensive acoustic foam and decorations that produce dense toxic smoke within minutes of ignition.

The second recurring issue is emergency exits that exist to satisfy building regulations but are reportedly locked or blocked, preventing evacuation during an emergency. The third is the repeated discovery of victims inside toilets, where people sought refuge after losing visibility in smoke-filled buildings or being unable to find emergency exits.

Daily News reported that Thailand’s building regulations already require fire safety measures, but stresses that effective enforcement by the relevant authorities and greater responsibility from venue operators are essential if similar disasters are to be prevented. It also urges the public to consider the safety standards of entertainment venues before visiting.

Pictures courtesy of Daily News

Related story

Fire-kills-at-least-27-in-Bangkok-pub

View full article

Venues are being built or opened and nobody cares about safety anymore. There should be an institution, independent, that checks all venues regularly for dangerous materials and blocked fire exits and of course sprinkler or hoses

The tragic cost of corruption.

3 minutes ago, Kinnock said:

The tragic cost of corruption.

Is this an act of corruption or a failure of effective governance? Safety is optional in Thailand.

They purchase the cheapest possible soundproofing material on the market

This is the reason why these things happen.

Noise complaints lead to renovations using the cheapest of materials which does indeed work to keep the sound out but it also works as a great firelighter / accelerant when the cheapest option is used.

So - how many more 1000s of venues across the country use this stuff to keep the noise in ?

23 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

Venues are being built or opened and nobody cares about safety anymore

Anymore ? When did they ever care.

3 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

Venues are being built or opened and nobody cares about safety anymore.

Eeeeh? Anymore???? Please go back in time, and tell me when they cared about safety in Thailand?

Hopefully the owners and management will spend time in prison for killing customers.

I guess many of them are rich enough to pay off the police though.

1 hour ago, Purdey said:

Hopefully the owners and management will spend time in prison for killing customers.

I guess many of them are rich enough to pay off the police though.

No doubt, it's the gardener who is responsible.

There will be the usual running around , checking out safety protocols and fire exits in clubs up and down the country.

The usual political statements about crackdowns and safety permits etc

Then , a few months down the line , the dust will settle and everything will be back to normal until the next time.

Rinse and repeat.

This should be easy to sort. Send in a single agent to every venue/pub/disco etc with a small blowtorch. Try to ignite the insulation on the roof/walls in a few different spots. If it catches fire, huge fine, shut the venue down, and only allow them to open if they replace the material (and it passes the blowtorch test).

4 hours ago, Purdey said:

Hopefully the owners and management will spend time in prison for killing customers.

I guess many of them are rich enough to pay off the police though.

The goverment "officals" that inspect and approve these places should also be doin a bit of time behind bars too.

A truly horrible way to go, poor souls. RIP.

1 hour ago, Ralf001 said:

The goverment "officals" that inspect and approve these places should also be doin a bit of time behind bars too.

Unfortunately the only time they are doing/going to do behind bars during inspections is to see how much free alcohol they can guzzle as possible!

Edited July 13Jul 13 by scottiejohn

I went into Lucifer on Walking St for the 1st and last time in 2003/04. It was a disaster waiting to happen.

Don't know if it still open or closed, or whether it was ever brought up to some acceptable level of safety.

15 hours ago, Ralf001 said:

The goverment "officals" that inspect and approve these places should also be doin a bit of time behind bars too.

Do they even have suitably qualified people to do the checks, or simply a guy turns up, takes the envelope and gives a nod. Regular fire regulation compliance checks, or unscheduled ones, should not be a difficult thing to arrange. Most bars etc have a wall full of certificates and licenses,

Edited July 13Jul 13 by jacko45k

3 minutes ago, jacko45k said:

Do they even have suitably qualified people to do the checks

Ive no personally checked their credentials.