10 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

I was watching Jeremy Vine the other morning (don't ask me why), and apparently the least popular boys name in England this year is Andrew.

Proof, if proof was ever needed, that in little England, the sheep gene is as strong as the bigoted one.

Would you give your Child the same name as the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten ?

BTW, as you seem to enjoy giving out verbal abuse , maybe you would

19 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

I am no fan of Burnham and dislike the man, but you are presenting the extreme end of an estimate that says he could be worth anywhere from £1 million to 2.5 million . He spent 25 years working with most years as a cabinet member or mayor. He saved his income. An explanation is found here. https://londonlovesbusiness.com/how-rich-is-andy-burnham-the-former-mayors-fortune-revealed/

They will try anything to throw shade on people without doing any research whatsoever.

His income is explainable and completely transparent with easy to find insights such as https://maialafortezza.com/andy-burnham-net-worth/

'The bulk of Burnham’s wealth comes from predictable, transparent sources. There are no investment portfolios, offshore holdings, or corporate board fees in the picture. His declarations to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority show no shares, trusts, or directorships.'

But lets not Let the facts get in the way of tryng to undermine honest politicians because their own choices are so very obviously corrupt.

24 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

The good news is that Rupert Lowe and his team have drafted a very comprehensive deportation, which if put into practice would see a significant reduction in the number of illegals plaguing the UK and a consequential reduction of those attempting to enter illegally as a result

Which has nothing to do with the survey methodology.

If Restore gain power and if they can reduce the number of illegal migrants trying to enter the country, then that would be good news.

40 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

sending them back from whence they came is a very constructive solution. no research required

The UK has throughout its' history relied on immigrants to supplement its' native labour force.

But hey, why let economic necessity get in the way of a bit of good, old-fashioned racism and xenophobia.

7 hours ago, Tidal wave said:

Rupert is the only one of the current crop of sniveling rancid detritus I would vote for the man is tirelessly keeping the rape gangs in the news.

Right now we need him as PM' and Tommy Robinson' as Home Secretary and Chomper' on the broom.

The broom would have to be left handed and never sweep right of course🤔

19 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Yep, and the odious toad Rupert Lowe posted this odious little slanted stat with an odious little commentary about "ending the Islamification of England."

Of course the stat does NOT mention that 90% of Muslim boys are usually called Mohammad / Muhammad as their first name and instead go by their middle name which is more of an unique name.

Ten children are born. Two are Muslim boys called Muhammad. The other eight are Christian children and are called Noah, James, Eric, Jonny etc.

The thing is most people with any intelligence can see through this odious grand standing. Sadly many of his followers don't.

If only all white families called their children Noah or Leo or Luca or Theo then Muhammad would be no where the most popular name.

Good post. Most Restore types who most the nonsense about Mohammed being "the most popular" name are not the brightest.

36 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Would you give your Child the same name as the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten ?

BTW, as you seem to enjoy giving out verbal abuse , maybe you would

Of course. So sorry. How careless of me.

My apologies if I offended any sheep.

BTW, my youngest lad is called Andrew. Of course that was given about 10 years ago before being easily offended and woke became a national passtime.

Having a broad mind is truly a blessing.

On 7/14/2026 at 10:07 AM, Bday Prang said:

They are all millionaires, even those that have never worked or run a business , Angela Rayner for god's sake where did her millions come from ? Child benefit?,

How much money has "Andy" amassed during his years of selfless public service? Blair has that much money nobody is able to count it , another one who has never worked

Champagne socialists every single one of them

You and your ilk, selectively attacking people for being wealthy, is more than a little bizarre,

“Champagne socialists”—love it! Pass the flute!

Of course, none of the fatcats on the public dole are in any way socialist.

The Low [sic intentional] report starts off sensibly and the testimonies are heartfelt and believable. But one-half or two-thirds in, he’s got out the pitchforks and torches for Pakistanis.

The only thing keeping him alive is hate and, of course, the deluded’s donations.

On 7/14/2026 at 10:35 AM, Keeenok Powell said:

Massive mistake by reform driven by Farage’s ego.

Without trying he was overtaking NF in popularity.I reckon it came to a head when Elon Musk stated that he thought RL would be a better leader.Shame they couldn’t work together.

Right. And what does African-American Leon have to do with anything in the UK???

On 7/14/2026 at 10:53 AM, save the frogs said:

To win battles.

No "winners" around here, Froggy. Just friendly, adult dialogue.

26 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Good post. Most Restore types who most the nonsense about Mohammed being "the most popular" name are not the brightest.

What a bizarre post Mohammed' not for the first year is the most popular boy's name that was on BBC news last week proving the Islamification of the UK is well under way ,

and even more bizarrely you must be claiming more luminance than a Restore type and that's an outright lie.

On 7/14/2026 at 11:45 AM, JonnyF said:

Lowe has you rattled.

That's why you've posted so many times on this thread already.

Not rattled. I actually read his racist report on 'rape gangs', blaming all Pakistanis for the crimes of a few.

5 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

No "winners" around here, Froggy. Just friendly, adult dialogue.

You're late to the party.

2 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Not rattled. I actually read his racist report on 'rape gangs', blaming all Pakistanis for the crimes of a few.

That's not what I understood at all.

I think you are misrepresenting him.

Most of the rape gang perpetrators were from the same town (or village or area) in Pakistan. And Lowe thought it might be a good idea to try to understand why these people from this specific area are behaving like that, etc ...

I don't think your comment is accurate at all.

And this "racist" card is probably not much different than Israel constantly playing the anti-semitism card to shut everyone up.

He is addressing an issue that most other politicians swept under the carpet, to the detriment of the victims and their families, yet you choose to oversimplify it by calling him a racist.

That's stupid.

Edited July 15Jul 15 by save the frogs

9 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Yeah, no sorry I'm not on board with that.

Which part do you dispute?:

That almost ALL modern inventions came from people who originated from western Europe (whites)?
Maybe you could use g-AI to find some exceptions that prove the rule?

It's well known that people from colder countries are higher IQ than those from hot countries
It's a FACT.
TBF White people's brains also seem to turn to <deleted> when they live in hot countries for a while too (not saying youre' gf or wife isn't 'different' tho ;-)

Also noted that Israel is the only country allowed to be a (jew only) ethnic state.
....is too obvious to question

42 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Of course. So sorry. How careless of me.

My apologies if I offended any sheep.

BTW, my youngest lad is called Andrew. Of course that was given about 10 years ago before being easily offended and woke became a national passtime.

Having a broad mind is truly a blessing.

You are absolutely amazing .

Not a sheeple and open minded .

You are truly blessed and much better than everyone else

3 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Which part do you dispute?:

IQ is not the issue.

Society needs all sorts of workers, from doctors to nuclear physicists to janitors.

If everyone is a doctor, who will do the janitor jobs?

And I don't delude myself that many folks all over the world are smarter than me, more ambitious, harder working ....

4 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Which part do you dispute?:

That almost ALL modern inventions came from people who originated from western Europe (whites)?

ChatGPT: That claim is false. While Western Europe and its diasporas (e.g., the United States) played a major role in industrialization and modern science, key inventions and foundational technologies come from many regions: for example, paper, printing, gunpowder, and the compass from China; algebra and advances in optics from the medieval Islamic world (e.g., Ibn al-Haytham); zero and major mathematical concepts from India; as well as important contributions from Africa, the Americas, and East Asia in medicine, agriculture, and engineering. Modern innovation is cumulative and global, not the product of any single race or region.

Abraham Lincoln said it's better to keep your mouth shut and everyone thinks you're an idiot than to open it and show everyone they're right.

You just showed everyone didn't ya

😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣😭

Edited July 15Jul 15 by SiSePuede419
Showbiz

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Not a sheeple and open minded .

If you need to broaden your mind, we're here for you man .

7 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Which part do you dispute?:

Lebanon had a highly educated workforce once upon a time.

But then the economy crashed.

Economies need to be strong, governments need to be progressive.

It's not about lower IQ.

Edited July 15Jul 15 by save the frogs

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

You are absolutely amazing .

Not a sheeple and open minded .

You are truly blessed and much better than everyone else

Thanks for the affirmation Nick, appreciated but not really necessary.

4 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

IQ is not the issue.

Society needs all sorts of workers, from doctors to nuclear physicists to janitors.

If everyone is a doctor, who will do the janitor jobs?

And I don't delude myself that many folks all over the world are smarter than me, more ambitious, harder working ....

Try again.

Which part do you dispute?:

That almost ALL modern inventions came from people who originated from western Europe (whites)?
Maybe you could use g-AI to find some exceptions that prove the rule?

It's well known that people from colder countries are higher IQ than those from hot countries
It's a FACT.
TBF White people's brains also seem to turn to <deleted> when they live in hot countries for a while too (not saying youre' gf or wife isn't 'different' tho ;-)

Also noted that Israel is the only country allowed to be a (jew only) ethnic state.
....is too obvious to question

21 hours ago, Tourist2 said:

Reform will win the next election but it'll be more of the same (unfortunately).

Everything is STILL a publicity stunt for reform

MIRI AF

JUL 07, 2026

‘Everything is a publicity stunt for Reform‘ was the title of one of my September 2025 articles, in which I referred to the fact that a large number of high-profile news items at the current time are, effectively, nothing more than confected publicity stunts for Reform, the UK political party tipped to win the next General Election.

I’ve covered at length the link between the Lucy Connolly state psyop, and Reform (Connolly being the guest of honour at Reform’s last party conference), and have also outlined how the threat of Digital ID (DiD) is being amplified and exaggerated in order to galvanise support for the anti-DiD Reform.

In September 2025, I wrote:

“[W]hen Starmer is finally ousted from power and a snap General Election is called (which will happen in 2026, according to eerily accurate predictive programming vehicle, Years and Years), the promoted, amplified “truthers” will all say:

“Look, I don’t like him any more than you do, but we have to vote for Farage to keep out digital ID! Nothing else matters, life as we know it will be over for good if this evil scheme comes in, so we must put our differences aside and all unite behind Nigel!”

---

That has become an even more likely eventuality since Starmer has now been ousted from power to be replaced by Andy Burnham, and it has been circulating recently that “Andy Burnham is quietly preparing to enforce strict new VPN restrictions to stop teenagers bypassing his under-16 social media ban... To enforce this, the state will be forced to ban, monitor, or require a mandatory Digital ID check for every single VPN user in the United Kingdom. They are literally building a state-controlled internet firewall, copying the exact digital prison models used by China and North Korea.”.

This, of course, creates a golden opportunity for Farage to ride in as the saviour, promising that, if he is Prime Minister, he will protect our rights to internet privacy, and such a promise will enormously inflate his electoral chances, for obvious reasons.

As of today, Farage has just staged yet another contrived publicity stunt to further promote Reform and boost his electoral chances - as well as making a snap General Election (GE) even more likely - by announcing that he intends to stand down as Clacton MP, in order to trigger a by-election, in which he will re-stand.

(Note the two Union Jacks behind him, not just one, as he makes this statement denoting a “double-cross” - wink, wink, nudge, nudge, etc.)

A sane person might be tempted to think, “eh? He’s standing down in order to re-stand? Isn’t that a bit risky?”

The point is that it isn’t.

Farage won by an enormous margin in the last GE, taking nearly half of all votes, and beating his closest rival (the Conservative candidate) by more than 8,000 votes. Meanwhile, the Liberal Democrat and Green candidates did so badly, they didn’t even get their deposits back.

Farage is untouchable in Clacton, and he knows it. Hence, the purpose of calling a by-election is to draw huge national (and likely international) attention to the fact that he is so popular, that he can resign and re-stand and still win his seat back (potentially with an even more staggering majority than before), because that is just how much the people love him.

He is cleverly framing this as a contest of “the people versus the establishment“, playing on the idea he has relentlessly exploited, that he, the privately educated, multi-millionaire, ex-financier, is anti-establishment, and that “they” are threatened by him.

Needless to say, this is all - as Heritage party leader, David Kurten, put it - “clown show theatre”.

It’s Punch ‘n’ Judy politics (all high-level, high-profile politics is). A staged show-fight between Farage and his club buddies to propel him to even more popularity and power, so he can win the next GE, which is the desired result for “them”, for reasons I’ve explored before: https://miriaf.co.uk/after-years-and-years-of-panto-politics/.

Politics

In this latest stunt, the top PR gurus behind Farage have very cleverly underlined his credentials as a protective family man, by promoting the idea that his daughter’s privacy has been threatened by the evil establishment, and that this is the last straw for man of the people, Nige:

“I will not tolerate intimidation of my family,” he fumed.

The idea that he’s risking it all by triggering a by-election out of protective paternal ire will play very well with voters, and help to ensure his roaring success.

So will his comments - especially for conservative Clacton - about the importance of competence in business, and the ability to create wealth and employment.

If Farage therefore comfortably wins this election, and it’s highly likely he will, it will put even more pressure on Labour to call a General Election and put Andy Burnham formally to the test.

Burnham has already been busy making himself unpopular, as discussed earlier, and there is plenty of fear mongering about all the terrible things he would do as Prime Minister, so I believe he would have no chance against Farage. This would be especially so if there were a few convenient and high-profile “Muslim terror attacks”, or other examples of immigrant crime, in the run-up to the election.

The whole thing is a confected soap opera, replete with plenty of plot twists and edge-of-your-seat moments - Farage intentionally teased audiences with strong hints he was going to step down from public life entirely... before clarifying he was actually going to do the exact opposite. It’s to keep us hooked on the action - and to manufacture our consent for the impending Reform government.

The establishment knows that faith and trust in it is at an all-time low following the covid fiasco, so, in order to re-engage apathetic and distrustful voters, and gain their consent for the next desired administration (Reform), that administration has to be styled as “anti-establishment”. It’s the same playbook as Donald Trump, so we can expect the same onslaught of staged fakery to surround Farage as we saw with Trump, as we get closer and closer to the elections (Clacton and then the GE).

David Kurten called it clown show theatre, and Plato made a similar pronouncement, roughly 2,500 years ago.

In his Allegory of the Cave, Plato illustrated how human perception is often limited to mere illusions - puppets and shadows on the cave walls - and that true knowledge and wisdom requires questioning what we perceive as reality, and accepting that it is, in many cases, not real, but just a manipulated show.

To see the truth, he advised, we must unshackle ourselves from the chains keeping us trapped in the cave, disengage from the distracting theatre, and go outside into the real world.

On Restore/Lowe:

To reiterate, Restore is not actually a political party (it's limited company with one shareholder (Lowe), and may never be one, but such is the limited public understanding of how political and electoral processes actually work (and this understanding is kept limited on purpose), few of Restore's members seem to know or care.

Politics

What they care about is that they feel part of a movement that speaks to them and reflects their concerns, because - just as Years and Years appears to have been scripted by a cultural Marxist PR agency - Lowe's Restore is deftly designed to appeal to every concern and prejudice the hard right (as distinct from the centre right, or just 'right') possesses.

Most of the right-wing has spent many years demonstrating that they are not in fact evil unreconstructed racists who want to send everyone who is not 100% white British back "home", but Restore is emboldening a small but very vocal group of people who do.

Whilst "extreme" ideas as reflected by Restore may gather a lot of traction on Twitter, they have little appeal in the real world or, crucially, at the ballot box. As such, a "hard right" party such as Restore (if indeed it ever does become a party) would never be elected.

The purpose of Restore, therefore, seems to be two-fold - one, to neutralise Advance UK, a genuine right-wing party with sensible policies on immigration and culture, by replacing it with a grotesque caricature of a "right-wing" party that will never gain meaningful mass appeal in the way that Advance could have (and that completely lacks the proper structure and democratic accountability that Advance possesses).

This is not a formal "endorsement" of Advance, by the way. I'm not a member of the party and don't agree with them on everything. Yet I can recognise a properly structured political party when I see one, and it's important to highlight that's what it is: a real, functioning political party, capable of standing candidates and doing all the other things political parties are formulated to do.

Restore, by sharp comparison, is not, and may not ever be, even if it gains Electoral Commission registration.

Secondly, the purpose of Restore clearly appears to be to make Reform look far more moderate (and thus far more electable), by hoovering up all its "fringe extremists" who so damage its credibility to the wider voter base. The last thing Nigel Farage wants to be seen as is the poster-boy for "far-right extremists", as that's the death knell to political credibility, and he made that clear in a recent speech.

Farage needs to present as moderate to get into power. As and when he achieves that, then all his "far-right extremism" can emerge, as depicted in Years and Years. It's the predictable political pantomime of presenting one way to get votes, then revealing one's true colours once in power.

This will then be used to "prove" that all right-wingers are the same. Whether they overtly present as "hard right", like Rupert Lowe and Restore, or pretend to be more moderate, like Farage and Reform, once they're in power, they all behave the same way - as virulent racist, misogynist, transphobic mass murderers.

We saw it in The Handmaid's Tale (a seemingly moderate, populist right-wing faction mutate into monsters once they have power).

We saw it in Years and Years ("people's politician" Viv Rook, who even dances along to pop songs in her election campaign, reveals herself as the vicious crook she really is once in power).

We will see it in our own culture, once Reform is elected to government (and likely in the US, too, under Vance).

It's all being deftly directed from behind the scenes in exactly the same way TV productions are, and we can discern the scripted soap opera nature of all this posturing political theatre by the fact that we have so many recurring characters.

Who's now publicly championing Rupert Lowe? Oh look, it's Lucy Connolly, the high-profile "political martyr" who wanted to burn immigrants to death.

Which journalist is eagerly promoting Restore? Why, it's Dan Wootton, the same hack who was one of only two reporters Connolly agreed to speak to in her immediate "release" from prison.

Who submitted a petition to parliament concerning Connolly and took her and husband Ray into Westminster to pose for pics? Oh, no kidding, it's Rupert Lowe!

See what I mean? It's just one big - or quite small, actually - contrived club, where the same names come up again and again, all playing pantomime characters and delivering scripted soap opera responses to keep the audience hooked - and crucially, neutralised in the real world.

High-profile current events and well-known people aren't "real", they're actors playing parts and reading from scripts, controlled by an intricate network of hidden hands.

Restore and Rupert Lowe aren't ultimately any more "real" than Vivienne Rook and her Four Star Party (so named because of her relatable everywoman tendency to swear) in Years and Years. They're there for the same reasons: To manage the mass mind. To engage in predictive programming. That's what soap operas do.

Yet in recognising this, there is no reason to feel hopeless. On the contrary: just as we can distinguish between Years and Years and real life, we should be able to distinguish between high-profile pantomime "political movements" and real ones, too.

T

here are real, authentic people trying to make a difference in politics, often on the local level, so they get little or no mainstream press attention, and typically have a smattering of followers on social media.

I've written about my own forays into local politics before, having stood both as an independent candidate, and for the anti-lockdown Freedom Alliance party, in local (council) elections, several times from 2021. I didn't come close to getting elected, but it was a worthwhile experience, in terms of learning how the political and electoral processes work - since, as I alluded to earlier, most people don't know, and politicians ruthlessly play on this - as well as in platforming an anti-lockdown, pro-freedom message to a wider, real-world audience.

As has been decried about the freedom movement many times, it mainly exists online, and this is probably its fatal flaw, as "they" completely control the digital space (more so than ever since the advent of the deeply Orwellian Online Safety Act, and its equivalents around the world).

The real world is our domain - that's why they're so desperate to keep us out of it, by having us all working from home, socialising online, and - if they get their way - fully surrendering our 'reality privilege', existing merely as avatars in the metaverse.

They want us all bickering online, drawn in by the endless dopamine-spiking drama of the digital panto: the addictive, fully interactive social media soap opera that is high-profile politics.

'Restore', therefore, is a digital project for a digital age (see how sharply Rupert Lowe's behaviour as an MP in parliament contrasts with his performative persona online), which - even if it does achieve full registration with the EC - will never really exist in the real world in a meaningful way.

You, however, can. We all can. Of course, there are many ways to do this, but one option worth currently considering is engaging in the local elections, coming up in May. Local elections are usually largely ignored, with typical turnouts hovering around 30% - or much lower in some areas - and they generally generate little press attention, but this year's are likely to attract significantly higher engagement, because Keir Starmer tried to cancel them. A lot of eyes will therefore be on them, and that presents a vital opportunity to get a message out. I don't merely mean voting in them, but standing yourself.

To stand in the local elections, you don't need any special qualifications, money, or to be a member of a political party. You just need to live, work, or own property in the borough in which you wish to stand. Then, you download a form from the council website, fill it in, hand it in at the council offices, and voila, you're on the ballot paper. That's it, that's all there is to it.

Whether you then canvass and campaign - or even vote - is entirely up to you, but if you do decide to campaign, it's a very useful way of engaging local people in the real world on issues you might not otherwise have found a way to discuss with them.

When you tell people you're "standing for the council" they will often open to you about issues they might otherwise not have disclosed, perhaps including family experience with vaccine injury, or issues of local corruption.

You can also disseminate leaflets saying, more or less, whatever you like, which are given extra gravitas in many people's eyes when the sentiments are accredited to a political candidate, rather than a random person on the internet (which, indeed, is precisely why Rupert Lowe is presenting his opinions as coming from a political party rather than simply a "movement" - because he knows this imbues his statements with much more power).

You can either stand as an independent, not affiliated with any party, or you can join one of the many legitimate smaller pro-freedom parties, of which there are several (Heritage, Freedom Alliance, and ADF, to name but a few). Joining a party may be preferable for first-time candidates, as parties can give you vital extra support in guiding you through the process and helping you to campaign. If you find a party that interests you, just contact them and let them know you'd like to know more: they will invariably be thrilled to hear from you, as smaller parties inevitably don't attract a fraction of the support the "big boys" do.

Now, I know there are vast swathes of the freedom movement who believe voting is rigged and/or pointless and that "you can't vote your way out of tyranny", with which I agree. I suggest political engagement, at the local level particularly, not because it will make a difference to any Grand Plans the overlords may have on the national and international level (it won't, even if you get elected, which you almost certainly won't).

Rather, I suggest it because it is a real-world way of platforming pro-freedom ideas that many in your local community may not have heard before; because it breaks the digital stranglehold on alternative ideas by getting them off the internet and into reality; and because it does actually really rattle the establishment.

The uni-party considers local politics, like national politics, to be a closed shop that they control, which is why they intentionally don't educate the masses about how local politics works, and everyone leaves their government school after fourteen years completely clueless about how to get directly politically active themselves - as in, actually standing as a candidate, not just voting for one. People are left with the impression that only special, qualified people can be candidates, and that it's difficult or impossible for ordinary people to get involved.

The reality is that pretty much anybody can enter politics and put themselves down as a candidate - and when "anybodies" do do this, when ordinary people infiltrate the establishment's little (uni) party - they are absolutely furious. This is because they know there's a chance - and it may often be small, but it's there - that one of these impertinent outsiders could actually oust them from their position (even if not by getting directly elected, an unanticipated outsider can certainly change the outcome of an election by taking votes away from a leading candidate).

I've been to several electoral counts now, where votes are totted up after the polling booths have closed (candidates are invited to supervise these counts to ensure no skulduggery goes on), and the open air of brazen hostility towards independent or small party candidates from the Tories, Labour, Lib Dems and Greens is palpable.

So, the takeaway from all this is, don't mistake soap operas for reality, whether they're presented via the TV or Twitter, but also, don't lose hope: remember that, just because soap operas are fake, doesn't mean everything is. The real world is just that, and that's the one environment "they" can't control with their algorithms, bot farms, and shadow bans.

You missed adding ‘Thank you for your attention to this matter’

6 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

ChatGPT: That claim is false. While Western Europe and its diasporas (e.g., the United States) played a major role in industrialization and modern science, key inventions and foundational technologies come from many regions: for example, paper, printing, gunpowder, and the compass from China; algebra and advances in optics from the medieval Islamic world (e.g., Ibn al-Haytham); zero and major mathematical concepts from India; as well as important contributions from Africa, the Americas, and East Asia in medicine, agriculture, and engineering. Modern innovation is cumulative and global, not the product of any single race or region.

Abraham Lincoln said it's better to keep your mouth shut and everyone thinks you're an idiot than to open it and show everyone they're right.

You just showed everyone didn't ya

😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣😭

Why are India, Africa, the Middle East etc., still <deleted>hole countries? 

3 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Chinese are close to white and get a pass cos they tend to be smart and don';t cause trouble or rape natives etc.

So would it be racist to give preferential treatment to certain ethnicities for immigration based on a history of committing fewer crimes, integrating more into society, not having religious beliefs which may conflict with the native country?

it's a trick question. don't answer it.

Why are India, Africa, the Middle East etc., still <deleted>hole countries? 

Another snot snosed KGB agent cutting and pasting script firehouse propaganda it's really quite dumb and juvenile they're flippant talking ❌

Edited July 15Jul 15 by SiSePuede419
Kgb dumb

1 minute ago, Mr Awesome said:

Why are India, Africa, the Middle East etc., still <deleted>hole countries? 

For one thing, Western countries meddle in their affairs and interfere with their progress.

What started out as "trade" between England and India degenerated into looting their resources.

3 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

So would it be racist to give preferential treatment to certain ethnicities for immigration based on a history of committing fewer crimes, integrating more into society, not having religious beliefs which may conflict with the native country?

it's a trick question. don't answer it.

Immigration should benefit the country. The West is absorbing too many immigrants who provide little to no value to countries they invade, other than giving the left something to virtual signal about.

1 minute ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Another snot snosed KGB agent cutting and pasting script firehouse propaganda it's really quite dumb and juvenile they're flippant talking ❌

Are the counties listed considered first-world countries? Did I overlook anything?

2 minutes ago, Mr Awesome said:

Immigration should benefit the country. The West is absorbing too many immigrants who provide little to no value to countries they invade, other than giving the left something to virtual signal about.

ChatGPT: Immigrants broadly contribute labor, entrepreneurship, and taxes; most evidence shows net economic benefits, with outcomes shaped by policy, integration, and labor market needs—not blanket “no value” claims.

Liar 😀