The US House of Representatives has approved a resolution seeking to halt President Donald Trump's military action against Iran unless Congress authorizes it, marking the latest congressional rebuke of the administration's handling of the conflict.

The measure passed by 214 votes to 208, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support. Republican Representatives Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett and Warren Davidson crossed party lines to back the resolution, which was introduced by Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal.

Although the vote represents a significant political setback for the White House, the resolution would not legally force the administration to end military operations. As a concurrent resolution, it is not sent to the president for approval or veto and does not carry the force of law.

Senate Rejects Similar Measure

Later on Thursday, the Senate voted on a separate effort to limit Trump's war powers in Iran, but the proposal failed by 47 votes to 49.

Republican Senator Susan Collins joined Democrats in supporting the measure, while Democratic Senator John Fetterman voted with Republicans to reject it.

The votes came after fighting resumed following the collapse of a recent ceasefire and the breakdown of a memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran.

Growing Republican Unease

The House vote marked the second time lawmakers have attempted to limit Trump's authority to continue military action against Iran, but it was the first since diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran collapsed.

Democrats have repeatedly forced votes in both chambers to restrict the president's war powers. While those efforts have largely failed, they have attracted increasing Republican backing, reflecting growing unease within the party over the prolonged conflict.

The debate has intensified following the return to the United States on Wednesday of the flag-draped bodies of four American service members killed during the war.

Some Democrats argue that congressional war powers resolutions remain legally binding despite questions over their enforceability, noting that courts have not definitively ruled on the issue.

Democrats Highlight Political Message

House Democrats said the repeated votes also reflect public opposition to another prolonged US military conflict as the midterm elections approach.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said many Americans were tired of the United States entering wars without sufficient justification and spending vast sums on overseas conflicts.

She said passing the resolution before lawmakers left for the August recess sent a message opposing the war, warning that it had harmed the global economy while diverting attention from the concerns of working-class Americans.

Jayapal said she believed some Republicans who did not participate in the vote wanted to avoid explaining to constituents why they opposed ending what she described as an illegal war.

Trump has previously criticised Republicans who backed earlier efforts to curb his war powers, calling them "losers" in posts on Truth Social and telling party members in private meetings that their actions had made his job more difficult.

In June, during the ceasefire, the Senate approved a resolution aimed at removing US military forces from Iran. However, lawmakers reversed course a day later after failing to advance a similar war powers measure.

Join the discussion?

24 July 2026

View full article

The resolution means little since the Senate will not pass the House Bill. However, now that the House sentiment is known, it will disrupt attempts to secure funding for ongoing financial support of the conflict.

4 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

The resolution means little since the Senate will not pass the House Bill. However, now that the House sentiment is known, it will disrupt attempts to secure funding for ongoing financial support of the conflict.

Well, Trump is obviously under pressure to get a good settlement/deal before the midterms. If not, he will be swept away.

I'm not sure Iran might have their nuclear bomb ready before.

Most Americans disagree with him and how he’s not with it upstairs but we can’t do a damn thing about it. Can someone please help? He is destroying this world as we know it and in over his fat head. He has become a complete disgrace to America and the world.

.

50 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

I'm not sure Iran might have their nuclear bomb ready before.

Ironically Saudi Arabia may have thanks to Trump's support.

5 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Well, Trump is obviously under pressure to get a good settlement/deal before the midterms. If not, he will be swept away.

I'm not sure Iran might have their nuclear bomb ready before.

He should get “swept away”, preferably permanently, either way regardless of what he does until November! He’s a disaster!

5 hours ago, jcmj said:

Most Americans disagree with him and how he’s not with it upstairs but we can’t do a damn thing about it. Can someone please help? He is destroying this world as we know it and in over his fat head. He has become a complete disgrace to America and the world.

You're missing the point of what is actually happening in the US.

It's not about 'him'. It's about those who back him to the hilt who are very rich and very powerful. As well as the 77 million who knowingly and voluntarily put him in the White House even though all his vile proclivities had been recorded and judged over decades.

That is why the rest of the world is turning away and why we even prefer dealing with China nowadays. 'He' is at best but a symptom of a far more sinister, widespread and deeper malignant malaise.

10 hours ago, webfact said:

increasing Republican backing, reflecting growing unease within the party over the prolonged conflict.

'Gowing unease'? Is that all they've got? 'Growing unease'?

On 7/24/2026 at 8:55 AM, newbee2022 said:

Well, Trump is obviously under pressure to get a good settlement/deal before the midterms. If not, he will be swept away.

I'm not sure Iran might have their nuclear bomb ready before.

And be no more dangerous than the prime aggressor in the Middle East: Israel.

On 7/24/2026 at 2:41 PM, BusyB said:

You're missing the point of what is actually happening in the US.

It's not about 'him'. It's about those who back him to the hilt who are very rich and very powerful. As well as the 77 million who knowingly and voluntarily put him in the White House even though all his vile proclivities had been recorded and judged over decades.

That is why the rest of the world is turning away and why we even prefer dealing with China nowadays. 'He' is at best but a symptom of a far more sinister, widespread and deeper malignant malaise.

I think a lot of those MAGAs have buyer remore. I mean, they can't be that stupid, can they? Don, Jr in 2028! /s

On 7/24/2026 at 9:41 AM, BusyB said:

You're missing the point of what is actually happening in the US.

It's not about 'him'. It's about those who back him to the hilt who are very rich and very powerful. As well as the 77 million who knowingly and voluntarily put him in the White House even though all his vile proclivities had been recorded and judged over decades.

That is why the rest of the world is turning away and why we even prefer dealing with China nowadays. 'He' is at best but a symptom of a far more sinister, widespread and deeper malignant malaise.

Republican Backlash Grows Against Hegseth Over Iran War

Republican support for Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is showing signs of strain as senior GOP senators question his leadership of the Iran conflict and criticise a string of high-profile military dismissals.

The growing discontent threatens to complicate the administration's push for more defence funding at a time when the war is becoming increasingly costly and politically contentious.

Thom Tillis

Confidence Crumbles in the Senate

North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis delivered the strongest rebuke yet, declaring he had "no confidence" in Hegseth's leadership.

Tillis accused the Defence Secretary of forcing out some of the Pentagon's most respected leaders, micromanaging the department and allowing internal power struggles to take hold. He suggested other Republicans were close to publicly breaking ranks, saying many were only "one decision" away from turning against him.

Military Firings Fuel Concern

Maine Senator Susan Collins also voiced alarm over the dismissal of General Christopher Donahue, the Army's top commander for Europe and Africa, describing the move as "deeply troubling".

The criticism comes amid wider concern that the removal of experienced military leaders could undermine confidence inside the armed forces at a critical moment in the conflict.

War Costs Raise Political Pressure

Hegseth's leadership has also come under scrutiny over the handling of the Iran war, which has reportedly cost the United States $37.5 billion. Several Republican senators warned that public patience is wearing thin as the conflict drags on with no clear end in sight.

West Virginia Senator Shelley Moore Capito and Iowa Senator Joni Ernst reportedly cautioned that Congress is increasingly uneasy about the financial burden and the level of transparency surrounding the campaign, including confusion over reported US casualties.

Defence Secretary Fights Back

Appearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Hegseth rejected claims that the operation had become a failure, accusing critics of undermining the sacrifices made by American troops.

He insisted the military campaign remained focused on preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and condemned descriptions of the conflict as a "quagmire".

Despite the criticism, Hegseth retains influential supporters. Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Roger Wicker urged the administration to intensify military pressure on Iran, while Senator John Cornyn argued the United States still possessed the military strength needed to force Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz without making major concessions.

With emergency defence funding still awaiting congressional approval, divisions within Republican ranks now threaten to become a significant political challenge for the Pentagon.

GOP loses faith in Hegseth over Iran war and military firings