Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Tourist fee survey for foreigners available only in Thai

Featured Replies

Thailand has opened an online public hearing on its proposed 450-baht tourism fee for foreign arrivals, but the 27-question survey is available only in Thai despite seeking views from overseas visitors.

The consultation, hosted on the Council of State's Digital Government Development Agency law website, (ข้อมูลการรับฟัง) remains open until 28 September. Respondents can submit answers as representatives of state agencies, private entities or members of the public.

Translation hurdle for foreign respondents

The webpage has a language option in its top-right corner, but it cannot be clicked. A Thai-language message instructs users to right-click and ask their browser to translate the page instead.

That may be manageable for users with browser translation tools enabled, but it requires visitors to identify the feature and ensure the translation is working before navigating what the Bangkok Post described as a dense and unintuitive form.

The central opening question asks whether respondents agree with collecting a fee from foreign tourists to support tourism management and development, including insurance provision while they travel in Thailand.

Other questions ask respondents to agree or disagree with legal definitions, including "foreign tourist", land and maritime checkpoints, and operators. The proposed definition of a foreign tourist is a non-Thai temporarily entering Thailand for travel without generating employment or compensation.

Questions on exemptions and payment

Question 10 allows multiple answers on whether the fee should apply to groups including diplomatic passport holders and work permit holders, although these groups would not ordinarily be classed as tourists.

The questionnaire also asks whether the chairman of the National Tourism Policy Committee should act as the authority under the proposed announcement. It does not offer a "don't know" or "no opinion" choice alongside agree and disagree.

Two questions have more immediate practical relevance for travellers. Question 14 asks whether visitors should receive a 30-day grace period when re-entering Thailand after paying on their first arrival, while question 17 asks which payment methods respondents prefer.

No implementation date for the proposed 450-baht levy was given in the consultation details.

Potentially billions for tourism fund

The Ministry of Tourism and Sports has said Thailand aims to restore tourism revenue to its pre-pandemic level of 3 trillion baht within four years. Reaching that target would require tourist numbers approaching pre-2020 levels of around 40 million annually.

Thailand recorded 33 million visitors last year. At 450 baht per arrival, that number would have raised 14.8 billion baht for the tourism fund had the levy been in force.

Weerasak Kowsurat, adviser to Deputy Prime Minister Suphajee Suthumpun and chairman of a visitor economy development working group, said: "We need to listen to as many perspectives as possible in order to implement the foreign tourism fee efficiently."


Related story

Thailand-seeks-foreign-views-on-450-baht-tourism-fee


Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

30 August 2026


View full article

  • Replies 41
  • Views 907
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • They most probably know that in the English version there would be overwhelming opposition to the fee.

  • Foreigners that don't read Thai should have no say or opinion on Thai policies. Most here on short terms visas, 12 month extensions of stays from agents as they don't have 400k baht, yet think they a

  • Hardy a shining example of welcome for it to be only in the one language it need not be in! Is it possible that answers from non-Thais are not welcome!

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

Hardy a shining example of welcome for it to be only in the one language it need not be in! Is it possible that answers from non-Thais are not welcome!

  • Popular Post

I commented on this already...... and that while Thailand is pretending to be a digital hub.

  • Popular Post

Only the cover page I could get to translate into English...

The questions I could not translate to English with a Chrome browser...

Farangs opinions not wanted...

  • Popular Post

They most probably know that in the English version there would be overwhelming opposition to the fee.

If this fee meant the end of dual pricing at attractions would the fee be less unattractive?

  • Popular Post

This is typical of the Thai style of doing things.

Yes, we surveyed people, but we really didn't survey them. 🙂

  • Popular Post

I viewed the questions through widget translation on Google. It's not for us anyway, the survey is designed for those working in the tourism industry. Q# 10 (on which groups to be excluded from the tax) they could have (should have) included a response for foreigners resident on LTRs and retirees who are resident more than 6 months of the year. But they don't.

They are truly smart! IQ cellar floor!

  • Popular Post

That's the kind of survey you put up if you really don't want to get any responses, so you can say "nobody cares" and do whatever you wanted to do anyway.

They are literally following a check list of things they need to show to be approved for OECD membership and the FTA with EU which they will not get anyway due to corruption, violating inter law, labour treatment and laws, pesticide usage (europe considers it cancer causing and unfit for human consumption)…..

While destroying more economy than they will gain back if approved in the process. Nobody with brains invests a dollar at this stage.

Anutin was slapped on his hands for the deportation law already and told to ASAP guarantee honoring international law in terms of deporting people without thai prison/jail standards.

Maybe trump can impose 1000% tarrifs to teach them.

Edited by sunrisecoconuts

Foreigners that don't read Thai should have no say or opinion on Thai policies.

Most here on short terms visas, 12 month extensions of stays from agents as they don't have 400k baht, yet think they are in the line of Chakri.

Learn the language. Become a resident, if you want to have a voice.

Edited by Packer

  • Popular Post
9 hours ago, ronnie50 said:

I viewed the questions through widget translation on Google. It's not for us anyway, the survey is designed for those working in the tourism industry. Q# 10 (on which groups to be excluded from the tax) they could have (should have) included a response for foreigners resident on LTRs and retirees who are resident more than 6 months of the year. But they don't.

Would be interesting to see the full details of the insurance coverage received by paying the 450Baht.

33 minutes ago, scorecard said:

Would be interesting to see the full details of the insurance coverage received by paying the 450Baht.

The insurance thing was dropped when they changed it from 300 baht to 450 baht, so I wouldn't count on insurance being part of this anymore.

  • Popular Post
6 hours ago, BrandonJT said:

The insurance thing was dropped when they changed it from 300 baht to 450 baht, so I wouldn't count on insurance being part of this anymore.

So, in effect, it seems to contradict one of the main reasons for imposing the charge - for underinsured foreigners who require state hospitalization.

Upon the suggestion by another poster, I opened the survey using Firefox, and everything, including all 27 questions, was translated into English.

On 8/30/2026 at 4:52 AM, jacko45k said:

Hardy a shining example of welcome for it to be only in the one language it need not be in! Is it possible that answers from non-Thais are not welcome!

Similar to the form we have to fill in to apply for a long-term visa. It's in Thai as well as English, even though no Thai ever completes it. Thai logic.

I was able to get my browser to translate it just fine. So I suppose it depends upon your browser and settings.

After reading so many sarcastic comments above, I think it’s worth congratulating and thanking the Thais for soliciting « customer input » for this kind of project. I’ve never seen such an effort for other matters in Thailand, or any other country. I just hope that they’ll take the time to really process any input, and take it into account.

  • Popular Post
8 hours ago, Packer said:

Foreigners that don't read Thai should have no say or opinion on Thai policies.

Most here on short terms visas, 12 month extensions of stays from agents as they don't have 400k baht, yet think they are in the line of Chakri.

Learn the language. Become a resident, if you want to have a voice.

The questionnaire does not give any foreigner a voice. So foreigners who can read Thai, still wouldn't be able to answer the questionnaire effectively - it's not meant for foreigners. Also, many of us are indeed long-term residents and many have LTRs, and many are pretty good at Thai language. We still don't have a voice. We will be paying the tourist levy each and every time we return to Thailand . We are not tourists - Thailand is the long-time home for many. They are basing the tax on the passport. What if you have PR?

Let's see if it's implemented as they seem to flip flop over raising the Tourists entry fee

Afraid it might upset the numbers coming to Thailand

Probably in truth a non starter

It is a fee for foreigners visiting Thailand; I cannot imagine that Thai people are against it. So the outcome is actually already known.

Not sure what this is all about, since the page automatically translates to English from the first to the last letter, using the Google translate addon in Firefox.

image.png

image.png

image.png

On 8/30/2026 at 6:06 AM, redwood1 said:

Only the cover page I could get to translate into English...

The questions I could not translate to English with a Chrome browser...

Farangs opinions not wanted...

No problem doing it today - browser translated page and all questions - Edge browser (Chrome version). BUT you must be quick and just click agree or disagree. Do not write comments - it times out very quickly and restarts, only after you click on images to prove you are human.

Atypical Thai IT expertise (formicated) and Thai xenophobia on full display. They have absolutely no self-awareness do they?

They plan to have random Somchais (not Immigration or Customs Officers) who work for the Tourism Agency, demanding foreign people arriving that they pay a fee. Given the situation in regards to Customs/Immigration rules, they will have to be be positioned somewhere after the initial Immigration checkpoint (not in Thailand yet) - and probably after the Customs checkpoint or it will be a massive problem with people and their bags. I predict that most people will not have the money readily available in Baht, and that many of them will be telling Somchai to urinate off - thinking it is a scam. Either way it is going to be a screw-up of epic proportions and a great laugh. But make sure you are not entering Thailand for a few months after the date it all starts 😉

Thailand Foreigners Arrival Fee.jpg

3 minutes ago, XRules said:

No problem doing it today - browser translated page and all questions - Edge browser (Chrome version). BUT you must be quick and just click agree or disagree. Do not write comments - it times out very quickly and restarts, only after you click on images to prove you are human.

Not so in Firefox.

image.png

1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

Not so in Firefox.

image.png

Chrome seems to have more issues than Firefox. Could be the browser or maybe OS - either way it is yet another example of the Thai IT system creators at work. I am still laughing about the PM having his ID Card available online for a few hundred Baht, and the investigation outcome (total incompetence at DLT).

10 hours ago, Packer said:

Foreigners that don't read Thai should have no say or opinion on Thai policies.

Most here on short terms visas, 12 month extensions of stays from agents as they don't have 400k baht, yet think they are in the line of Chakri.

Learn the language. Become a resident, if you want to have a voice.

Very true. But it's loads easier for those trapped and skint here to piss and moan about something that doesn't affect them, so they can carry on avoiding facing the results of their own poor life choices and lack of due diligence, just so they can feel better.

1 hour ago, ronnie50 said:

The questionnaire does not give any foreigner a voice. So foreigners who can read Thai, still wouldn't be able to answer the questionnaire effectively - it's not meant for foreigners. Also, many of us are indeed long-term residents and many have LTRs, and many are pretty good at Thai language. We still don't have a voice. We will be paying the tourist levy each and every time we return to Thailand . We are not tourists - Thailand is the long-time home for many. They are basing the tax on the passport. What if you have PR?

They'll probably gurn, just like the rest of you.

57 minutes ago, shackleton said:

Let's see if it's implemented as they seem to flip flop over raising the Tourists entry fee

Afraid it might upset the numbers coming to Thailand

Probably in truth a non starter

They never flip flopped over implementing the fee. They simply don't have a way to collect it. The airlines will not collect a fee that is only for some people, it's all or nothing. There was a shortlived proposal recently that Thais would pay it in their airfare and then get a rebate at the airport, but that proposal did not last long.

Now that the TDAC is a thing, it gives a potential avenue for the collection of the fee, so they're getting more serious about it. Realistically they should bring back the ETA idea they had for visa exempt people, and incorporate the fee into the ETA. They can also add it to the tourist visa fee for those applying at an embassy. As a bonus, this would create much less uncertainty about visa exempt entries, since the ETA would tell you if you're approved to enter or not, no more officer discretion. They can even tie it into the automate entry gates. You have an approved ETA and you paid the fee, you stroll in through the automated gates. Seems like a no-brainer.

Still don't care, petty change.

...To Give The Locals Their Jollies... (?)

...And Keep The Victims Tourists In The Dark... (?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.