Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Greenland - What's going on ?

Featured Replies

14 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Wow. Arent you just cutting me up with your rapier like toddler flames. 5555555

If you must post drivel at least, please make it worthwhile or possibly humorous!

PS; Please explain what a "rapier like toddler flames" means if you can!

  • Replies 49
  • Views 505
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Under the old agreement the US could station as many troops as they wanted in Greenland. Under the new agreement, to be signed at the United Nations General Assembly (I do hope that they have fixed t

  • How to say you have no idea what a search engine does without admitting you have no idea what a search engine does. 👍

  • Same old story. Trump claims he has made a better deal and it's just the same or worse than the existing one., NAFTA became CUSMA (best deal ever) which were essentially identical. CUSMA was no good s

Posted Images

  • Author
47 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

If you must post drivel at least, please make it worthwhile or possibly humorous!

PS; Please explain what a "rapier like toddler flames" means if you can!

wow. you are dumb LOL

  • Author
51 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Read the news and history!

There was an agreement in 1951 which has been replaced with this similar and lesser agreement which is a totally pointless new agreement as all it does is that it lets the TRUMPateer pretend it has gained something that he has actually lost! (as usual)

well how do the two agreements differ, with reference to clauses of course.

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

well how do the two agreements differ, with reference to clauses of course.

They don't differ, and that was explained to you multiple times already, but you still didn't got it. The existing clause from the existing agreement only got reworded to make an idiot happy.

There was one clause added, which defined that no enemy country can have a base in Greenland, which is something never gonna happen anyway. So it i a nothing burger clause

So please thel us again what you don't get.

  • Author
50 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

There was one clause added, which defined that no enemy country can have a base in Greenland, which is something never gonna happen anyway

without our permission LOL. We decide. That seems a win lol.

What about military bases? Foreign investment?

Who completely controls Greenlands foreign policy now?

20 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So whats happening with Greenland these days, I heard the Danes are ready to fight us off. Things have been quiet for a while. Trump blustering and lying and TACoing again?

Greenland’s Navy “Seals” are in training preparing to invade, probably via the Hudson River.

Denmark will assist by banning the export of Ozempic, timing the attack to coordinate with withdrawal symptoms and massive weight loss of the armed forces

Watch this space

27 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

without our permission LOL. We decide. That seems a win lol.

Uhm, Denmark was never gonna allow an enemey to have a bas on THEIR territory, so there would never be a request for permission. Only simple minds would think they won something with that clause.

30 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

What about military bases? Foreign investment?

Yeah no military bases from enemies, since you have to ask it twice, it is clear you didn't get it the first time.

And obviously you haven't read the agreement are out of your depth as usual.

image.png

37 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Who completely controls Greenlands foreign policy now?

For sure not the US, so again out of your depth. BNow waiting for your next silly got it reply

image.png

Heard a Danish foreign minister say nothing has changed, basically same agreement as before.

Just hot air from the orange Big Mac balloon so that he can claim he did something "no other human being in the history of the human race could ever do, but I did it because I am the greatest human in the history of the human race". Total blowhard.

  • Author
51 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Uhm, Denmark was never gonna allow an enemey to have a bas on THEIR territory, so there would never be a request for permission

really? but now they have no choice lol

53 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Uhm, Denmark was never gonna allow an enemey to have a bas on THEIR territory, so there would never be a request for permission. Only simple minds would think they won something with that clause.

Yeah no military bases from enemies, since you have to ask it twice, it is clear you didn't get it the first time.

And obviously you haven't read the agreement are out of your depth as usual.

image.png

For sure not the US, so again out of your depth. BNow waiting for your next silly got it reply

image.png

got it. you dont know lol. so china can buy up mines there now right? lol


51 minutes ago, Priorexpat said:

Heard a Danish foreign minister say nothing has changed, basically same agreement as before.

Just hot air from the orange Big Mac balloon so that he can claim he did something "no other human being in the history of the human race could ever do, but I did it because I am the greatest human in the history of the human race". Total blowhard.

total winner. again.

No idea. Few things are set in stone. One of my Air Force Room mates did a tour at Thule AFB back in the late 80s and I have worked on some of the radar systems there.

7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

really? but now they have no choice lol

got it. you dont know lol. so china can buy up mines there now right? lol


total winner. again.

Got it, you are just a fool who believes everything your cult master tells, as you are too dumb to think for yourself.

9 hours ago, Yagoda said:

without our permission LOL. We decide. That seems a win lol.

What about military bases? Foreign investment?

Who completely controls Greenlands foreign policy now?

Denmark/Greenland.

Greenland was not for sale. It remains not for sale.

That is why in the (unlikely) event that he retains control of the US government in the pending midterm elections, Trump will ignore the treaty and start demanding, threatening and whining again in a few months.

Denmark has possibly achieved three things: they have Trump's signature on a treaty - in itself of course meaningless -,but it will strengthen their case when he commences threats again, they have obtained some peace and quiet for a few months after the chaos and threats of the last 18 months, and they have affirmed the status quo, which will again stand them in good stead when/if the bullying starts again.

Edited by JAG

On 9/20/2026 at 1:33 AM, riclag said:

My Thai daughter's Danish boyfriend's head is exploding lol I imagine all the international left have similar feelings of, any agreement signed with Trump is like signing a contract with their boogiman.

Obviously neither you nor the Danish boyfriend read the agreement.

If he read it, he'd relax, knowing absolutely nothing has changed. Greenland and Denmark have the same relationship and status they had before. The US controls nothing, and has no rights to anything Greenland might have in the way of resources.

If you had read it, you'd do a Rosanne Rosannadanna: "Never mind".

This just reminds me...You CAN fool some of the Trumpers ALL of the time. Nigerian 419 scammers take note.

21 minutes ago, Wingate said:

This just reminds me...You CAN fool some of the Trumpers ALL of the time.

Sorry to point out such an obvious error on your part but you seem to have misstyped a word. The corrected version is below;

"This just reminds me...You CAN fool some ALL of the Trumpers ALL of the time."

  • Author
9 hours ago, JAG said:

Denmark/Greenland.

Greenland was not for sale. It remains not for sale.

That is why in the (unlikely) event that he retains control of the US government in the pending midterm elections, Trump will ignore the treaty and start demanding, threatening and whining again in a few months.

Denmark has possibly achieved three things: they have Trump's signature on a treaty - in itself of course meaningless -,but it will strengthen their case when he commences threats again, they have obtained some peace and quiet for a few months after the chaos and threats of the last 18 months, and they have affirmed the status quo, which will again stand them in good stead when/if the bullying starts again.

got it. You dont deny that we have complete control of the foreign policy of greenland now.

  • Author
10 hours ago, CallumWK said:

Got it, you are just a fool who believes everything your cult master tells, as you are too dumb to think for yourself.

Sure, I beleive in the reality that you dont.....

  • Author
2 hours ago, Wingate said:

The US controls nothing, and has no rights to anything Greenland might have in the way of resources

really? So if the Danes decide to let the chinese in we cany stop it. Got it.

2 hours ago, Wingate said:

Obviously neither you nor the Danish boyfriend read the agreement

Neither have you LOL.

The reason why Trump's argument that Russia or China could make strategic investment is BS! 😀

(BTW, there was already an EU regulation voted in 2019, and a subsequent Danish law in 2023.

What does the New EU FDI Regulation mean for Denmark? 

In Denmark, the existing FDI screening regime, set out in Act no. 1256 of 27 October 2023 on the screening of certain foreign direct investments etc. in Denmark (the "DISA"), will expectedly need to be revised to ensure alignment with the harmonized framework introduced by the New EU FDI Regulation. 

The DISA already covers a broad range of sectors, but the New EU FDI Regulation introduces a 'common minimum scope of foreign investments' that all Member States must screen. The sectors covered by this minimum scope are (i) Dual Use Items listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2021/821; (ii) Military Items listed in Annex to Directive 2009/43/EC; (iii) Critical technologies as defined in Annex I of the New EU FDI Regulation; (iv) Critical Infrastructure (including the transport, energy or digital infrastructure sectors and Electoral & Systemically Important Financial and Market‑Infrastructure Entities); and (v) Strategic raw materials listed in Section I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2024/1252.

https://kromannreumert.com/en/news/the-new-fdi-regulation-is-here-what-changes-denmark

Edited by candide

Greenland and Denmark are celebrating Trump signing a deal he already had.......5555

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

Greenland and Denmark are celebrating Trump signing a deal he already had.......5555

Yep. Hot off successfully replacing Ayatollah Khamenei with Ayatollah Khamenei, Trump has now successfully replaced the 1951 US-Denmark treaty with the 1951 US-Denmark treaty.

Elect Stupid, expect stupidity.🤣

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.