cdnmatt Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) I don't think so.They are suffering from a loss of nerve, but have an opportunity to recover. Abhisit just finished telling off the people who are truly in control of this country (the military). Wouldn't expect him to be in power too much longer, especially considering the military's actions today proved they're more than willing to switch sides at this point in time. Edited April 9, 2010 by cdnmatt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunderland Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) Imagine if Abhisit had either:a) Held elections right when he became PM, to legitimize his mandate. -or- Accepted Thaksin's proposal to "share power", a few months ago. He would have likely been able to serve out his full term. Instead, he chose to go "all in" with his chips. I think a bag of chips might last longer than Abhisit. FYI ... the Village People moustache man is back ... Closely followed by a woman from L.A. who unless I am mistaken is the same woman who chattered away in English the other day. She sounds OK in English, but as soon as she speaks Thai (like now) she sounds like a right old dragon. Wouldn't like to bump into her on a dark soi. She'd scare the hel_l out of most of us. Edited April 9, 2010 by Sunderland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyLew Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 [This could mean that a crackdown is on the cards and bloodshed will happen, then Abhisit steps down.. Army has already said they will not hurt thai people, so I don't think that will happen. There will be a coup very quickly or abhisit will try to hang on and draw it out.... but will eventually be TOLD to call elections. As what he is doing now is making a mockery out of the party and the military at the same time. It is not Abhisit making a mockery, he has done what he needs to be done ... the police and army do not follow orders, the police and army looking week derilliction (sp) comes to mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insight Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Let's review Abhisit's position tomorrow evening. If you think no lessons have been learnt today you're pretty misguided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyLew Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Imagine if Abhisit had either:a) Held elections right when he became PM, to legitimize his mandate. -or- Accepted Thaksin's proposal to "share power", a few months ago. He would have likely been able to serve out his full term. Instead, he chose to go "all in" with his chips. Sharing power with Tekki would be pretty stupid, share power with a crook Pretty much sums up most of your line of thought Like sharing power with a python Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunderland Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 God help us if this woman (the one from L.A.) is in line to be one of the next generation of leaders. I'll be sending a Facebook message to Abhisit to put her ahead of the other 24 people with arrest warrants against their names. If she were the main face of the reds, I would jump off the fence and run like mad. Bloody nutter!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainman Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Who is Tekki? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGTOE3 Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) It is not Abhisit making a mockery, he has done what needs to be done ... the police and army are not following HIS orders, the police and army are looking weak dereliction of duty comes to mind I agree Edited April 9, 2010 by BIGTOE3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
britmaveric Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) God help us if this woman (the one from L.A.) is in line to be one of the next generation of leaders. I'll be sending a Facebook message to Abhisit to put her ahead of the other 24 people with arrest warrants against their names. If she were the main face of the reds, I would jump off the fence and run like mad. Bloody nutter!!! Well she is entertaining in her own way. Edited April 9, 2010 by britmaveric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NADTATIDA1 Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 [This could mean that a crackdown is on the cards and bloodshed will happen, then Abhisit steps down.. Army has already said they will not hurt thai people, so I don't think that will happen. There will be a coup very quickly or abhisit will try to hang on and draw it out.... but will eventually be TOLD to call elections. As what he is doing now is making a mockery out of the party and the military at the same time. It is not Abhisit making a mockery, he has done what he needs to be done ... the police and army do not follow orders, the police and army looking week derilliction (sp) comes to mind Please correct me if i am wrong but isnt Abhisit a puppet for the military? I think through all of this which has been well documented by many,he has been able to do only so much and today he has castigated certain people in the military for not doing there job!! He is a pawn and of that there is no mistake,lets see how long he lasts after tonight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
britmaveric Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 ^He overstepped his bounds - seriously been better off dissolving parliament and resigning instead of the Emergency Decree. (looking like a major gaff presently) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spongeman Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) Having more elections in Thailand means nothing. Either side does not respect the result. That model is useless in Thailand. Another coup ? That just strips away foreign confidence in LOS. Anyone got any other ideas ? Edited April 9, 2010 by spongeman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NADTATIDA1 Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Having more elections in Thailand means nothing. Either side does not respect the result.That model is useless in Thailand. Another coup ? That just strips away foreign confidence in LOS. Anyone got any other ideas ? A poll? wheres jingthing when you need him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MB1 Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 [This could mean that a crackdown is on the cards and bloodshed will happen, then Abhisit steps down.. Army has already said they will not hurt thai people, so I don't think that will happen. Only time will tell, at least Abhisit has made his point to the army by lashing out at them if the report is true. Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva yesterday lashed out at the military top brass for failing to enforce the emergency law passed on Thursday, on a day when his leadership was tested to the limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yunnie Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) "The protesters brought Buddhist monks to the front, to counter which the police regrouped by bringing female riot police to the front of their lines. The protesters retreated as Buddhist monks in the Theravada sect cannot have physical contact with females."Someone was thinking on their feet. Neat. The moment I read that I started laughing. Thats pretty kickass of the police to do that and very dumb of the Reds to use monks. <deleted>, dont use monks as a meat shield. Have more respect :| Having more elections in Thailand means nothing. Either side does not respect the result.That model is useless in Thailand. Another coup ? That just strips away foreign confidence in LOS. Anyone got any other ideas ? Become "communist" like Lao P.D.R.... You never see protest there. Or just have the military take over period and no elections... be a military Junta like Burma. Edited April 9, 2010 by Yunnie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spongeman Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Having more elections in Thailand means nothing. Either side does not respect the result.That model is useless in Thailand. Another coup ? That just strips away foreign confidence in LOS. Anyone got any other ideas ? A poll? wheres jingthing when you need him A poll from Jingthing ? Thats the nuclear option....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NADTATIDA1 Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 "Become "communist" like Lao P.D.R.... You never see protest there. Or just have the military take over period and no elections... be a military Junta like Burma. " The status quo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Publicus Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 [This could mean that a crackdown is on the cards and bloodshed will happen, then Abhisit steps down.. Army has already said they will not hurt thai people, so I don't think that will happen. Suddenly today I see pickups full of minor children wearing red shits and red headbands, kids around 10, Prathom age for sure. I think the Redshirts have brought in bin Laden as a strategic advisor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoshiwara Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Imagine if Abhisit had either:a) Held elections right when he became PM, to legitimize his mandate. -or- Accepted Thaksin's proposal to "share power", a few months ago. He would have likely been able to serve out his full term. Instead, he chose to go "all in" with his chips. Sharing power with Tekki would be pretty stupid, share power with a crook Pretty much sums up most of your line of thought Like sharing power with a python ..with rainman as Monty.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elshaheen Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 "The protesters brought Buddhist monks to the front, to counter which the police regrouped by bringing female riot police to the front of their lines. The protesters retreated as Buddhist monks in the Theravada sect cannot have physical contact with females."Someone was thinking on their feet. Neat. Yes, bitch slap them red's. Woman power rules. Let's go girls and start up your engines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiterussian Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) Here is Thailands balance sheet 2005 to 2009(q3) I suppose I should put the change (in colour) in % change, and compare to other countries... but i cant be bothered. Edited April 9, 2010 by whiterussian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grayfield18 Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 I fully support a coup that is followed by free and fair elections. That's how we got to this point in the first place. Nope. The last coup wasn't followed by free and fair elections. Well according to the international monitors for Asia, yes it was.Odd that, you have to make a choice.... Regards The election process might have been free and fair. However, the removal of the last freely elected government by a coup was not and therefore the basis of the following election could not be said to be free or fair. Thai's like most people seem to like to have a face saving compromise. The one that seems to me as a very interested outsider to hold the most water is for Abhisit to call an election in a reasonable period of time. That gives him the chance to carry on as PM for say 3 months and everyone to get themselves ready for the election. People can go home Bkk can get back to normal (or what passes for such in Bkk). I do support Thaksin but do not see his involvement as taking the Country forward now. If he gets what he wants then he should leave it be. I suspect that is a forlorn hope on my part. I don't see the point in arrest warrants and trials. It is hypocrisy on Abhisit's part as they did nothing to his supporters who closed the airport etc. Look at South Africa and Northern Ireland. Moving on is the only way forward and leaving the past behind. It is also a complete waste of money making it only for the lawyers and except in Thaksin's case is unlikely to bring a profit to the Country. If the Red's get what they want and election is called then and they take part then they have to agree to stand by the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Publicus Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 [This could mean that a crackdown is on the cards and bloodshed will happen, then Abhisit steps down.. Army has already said they will not hurt thai people, so I don't think that will happen. There will be a coup very quickly or abhisit will try to hang on and draw it out.... but will eventually be TOLD to call elections. As what he is doing now is making a mockery out of the party and the military at the same time. It is not Abhisit making a mockery, he has done what he needs to be done ... the police and army do not follow orders, the police and army looking week derilliction (sp) comes to mind The army is as hamstrung and berift of ideas as the Redshirts and the government. The courts have made clear they won't play a role either in the present Mexican standoff. Abhisit did make clear he's prepared now to get tuff and he proved it by cussing out the generals and police after the Thaicom fiasco. Abhisit is appearing to be the one guy with some clear approaches and is insistent about it - usually that's the kind of guy who carries the day. Yes, clear 'em out, gently, one pocket at a time but the real question is where do you put them? Put them on the road so they can turn around to come back again? In a fenced off concentration camp? Evict the dogs from the pound? Where to send all these nutcake people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ijustwannateach Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 I think we can safely say that Al Qaeda is way off topic for this thread. Related posts will be deleted and future posts attempting to continue in that line will earn warnings. Last chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siam Simon Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 The moment Abhisit criticised the purchase of the empty box 'bomb detector' he was toast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainman Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 (edited) The moment Abhisit criticised the purchase of the empty box 'bomb detector' he was toast. If not already then, surely when he canceled the new Zeppelin balloon toy. Edited April 9, 2010 by rainman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MellowYellow Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 [This could mean that a crackdown is on the cards and bloodshed will happen, then Abhisit steps down.. Army has already said they will not hurt thai people, so I don't think that will happen. Suddenly today I see pickups full of minor children wearing red shits and red headbands, kids around 10, Prathom age for sure. I think the Redshirts have brought in bin Laden as a strategic advisor. Maybe they have just learned from the PAD playbook. But, bringing kids into town doesn't seem nearly as bad as paying their families to use them as human shields on the front lines. From the PAD seizure of BKKs airport. Protesters in Thailand are luring children into their airport rally by paying mums and dads to give up their kids, according to an Australian trapped in the country...Families who joined the "peaceful" demonstration with babies or children were getting paid more, Ms Vennell said. "Many families are pushing their children to enter into the situation to provide more money for their families," she said. The idea is that the military or police won't use as much force because children were still there, she said. http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=676153 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parryhandy Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 To the people supporting the reds can you please answer me these questions ? I understand change is needed here but: Do you truly believe that the Thai people will have more freedom, opportunity and democracy under the stewardship of an obscenely rich Thai/Chinese oligarchy ? Do you think they will get to change their mind if they are wrong ? Look at the track record of the champion for democracy and ask yourself : When he was in power did he try to do anything that the reds are striving for ? Did he try to enhance debate and discussion ? Did he try to give everyday Thai people more power,control and democracy in their lives and stamp out corruption ? Did he listen to people ? Did he try to (item 4. on the udd principals list- the most important in my view) implement the rule of law, due process and a system of equal justice for all, free of any obstructions or double-standards.Did he try to improve the education,knowledge and skills of the people ? Or did he just use his time to obtain more wealth and power ? I honestly don't know the answer to some of these questions ? Maybe he had to be like he was so when he had achieved absolute power and wealth he could then become a benevolent dictator and that would be the only way he could change things and get things done.Finally he could work tirelessly for the Thai people ? What do you think ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xangsamhua Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Maybe they have just learned from the PAD playbook.But, bringing kids into town doesn't seem nearly as bad as paying their families to use them as human shields on the front lines. From the PAD seizure of BKKs airport. Protesters in Thailand are luring children into their airport rally by paying mums and dads to give up their kids, according to an Australian trapped in the country...Families who joined the "peaceful" demonstration with babies or children were getting paid more, Ms Vennell said. "Many families are pushing their children to enter into the situation to provide more money for their families," she said. The idea is that the military or police won't use as much force because children were still there, she said. http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=676153 MellowYellow, if posting media reports, please use ones with a bit more credibility than hearsay picked up by a young traveller with no other authentication. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
humfurry Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 I don't think so.They are suffering from a loss of nerve, but have an opportunity to recover. Abhisit just finished telling off the people who are truly in control of this country (the military). Wouldn't expect him to be in power too much longer, especially considering the military's actions today proved they're more than willing to switch sides at this point in time. That's how it should be in a free society. The military should be subordinate to civilian powers. It certainly goes against the Red's claim that Abhisit a puppet of the military. Should he retain power, my thinking is that Thailand has made a big step forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now