Fisrstly, Khall...It was more about the a certain Stoter´s assumption than the theory itself... hence assumption of the triangular.

Meatball...Do you remember your first sexual fantasy...

edit: onlykidding meat...It was meant ironically...I don´t really want to know... No! Seriously! sTOP TELLING Me....aRRRGHHHH!

Fisrstly, Khall...It was more about the a certain Stoter´s assumption than the theory itself... hence assumption of the triangular.

Meatball...Do you remember your first sexual fantasy...

edit: onlykidding meat...It was meant ironically...I don´t really want to know... No! Seriously! sTOP TELLING Me....aRRRGHHHH!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Firstly Kayo.... I'm sure you meant TOTSTER'S (as opposed to Stoter's ... don't beat me Master .... ) assumption of theory of the triangular Meatball's sexual fantasy .....

AND SECONDLY... I forget!!!!

Assumption of the triangular...

   

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Hey Tots... Can you get your head around that triangle thingy theory? Blows a fuse for me

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I've never been good at theory.... It's the practical side I excel in....

totster

Assumption of the triangular...

   

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Hey Tots... Can you get your head around that triangle thingy theory? Blows a fuse for me

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I've never been good at theory.... It's the practical side I excel in....

totster

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Well... that's all well and good Tots. But how does 4 divided by 3 fit into practice? See: Assumption of Trianglar Theory